Portofino
Well-Known Member
What I see at anchorages and suspect everyone else .Aaaaargh, noooo!
Between two hulls of identical size, if one needs more powerful stabilizers it's because its inherent stability is HIGHER, not lower!
Is this so hard to understand?
Surely bigger size exerts more force , otherwise why not fit a 4or 5 assuming 6 is the medium, middle ground .
@ H , it’s a complementary twist the 9 comment and good of Princess esp if Mapish M is right .
@ Mapish top heavy boats rock and pitch more .Wether that extra roll is comfortable or dismissed as longer / shorter or what ever roll period they still keep going after a passing wake noticeably longer than a ahem more lower centred of G boat like mine .
Seen it with my own eyes .
Indeed a masted yacht despite a keel advantage carry’s on rocking too and throw even longer .Pendulum effect I guess ?
Comparable lengths of vessels for valid comparisons .
Using the mk1 eye ball they ( top heavy boats + masted yachts ) carry on moving longer time wise and further in terms of distance or put another way stuff slides about off tables , the folks reach for handles and grab table contents etc .
If it’s being specced anyhow and works then great .
Just curious why the difference between close rivals .It stands out and i was interested in the rationale .
I suspect two overlaying things going off added together which need to be separated .
1- the straight 24K Kgs dry or 30 K kg operational mass which seakeeper crunch into there size calc algorithm
2- the pendulum effect ……how much % of that 24-30 K kgs is higher above the CoG / center of buoyancy or what ever .
You can’t just coin the phase continue to build Manhattan like boats on water , aim skywards without unwanted consequences or claim they are “ more stable “
If seakeepers facilities matching the product line ups to boat makers like this , so be it .