walkthrough of the Sealine SC47

[jtilly]

have a look...

http://www.sealine.com/SC47/SC47.aspx

 

[Whitelighter]

A Shame there is no three cabin option on the boat - be good for families if there were.

 

[jimmy_the_builder]

Jez! I thought you'd gone a bit quiet. What the latest with your W34? (Apologies for the fred rift).

Cheers
Jimmy

 

[[2068]]

Speaking personally, no immediate plans to have four children, hence no requirement for tri-cab. It's meant to be a pleasure boat (think big beds), not a ferry /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif

dv.

 

[Whitelighter]

I did say option of three cabins

 

[[2068]]

Twist the Bonsai tree in the saloon, and the sofa converts into another bed. Alternatively, if they've been bad, a sleeping bag in the engine compartment normally prevents repeat offences.

dv.

 

[Whitelighter]

[ QUOTE ]
Alternatively, if they've been bad, a sleeping bag in the engine compartment normally prevents repeat offences.

[/ QUOTE ]

I have so much to learn master...

 

[gimmesunshine]

looks much same as s41-3

 

[Hurricane]

The whole thing just makes me embarrassed that I once was a Sealine owner.

Call me old fashioned but I like the look of wood. Can you imagine sleeping in that?

 

[scubaman]

My feelings exactly (apart from the Sealine owner -part /forums/images/graemlins/cool.gif)

I've often looked at the ultra contemporary interior designs of new boats and thought that they look too much ikea and not enough boat.

I'd like the boat interior to look like, well, boat interior and not a design office. Even the odd squeak of teak under the foot would reinforce the feeling of being on a boat. All down to personal taste, ofcourse, but that's how i see it.

Ok, there are some squeaks on a Sealine /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif

 

[scubaman]

A bit of an extreme example but plenty of wood and IMHO definitely has a boaty feeling to it.

 

[Kipper]

It doesnt look very comfy does it. I know its only an artists impression but its all hard edges and thin cusshions to me.

Gary

 

[Deleted User YDKXO]

Agree with you entirely. This is a stupid design for a 47 footer which really should have a 3rd cabin at least as an option, especially since I guess this is an IPS boat and therefore should have space for it. But the other stupid thing is that the guest cabin has a double berth. How many kids above, say, 7 yrs old are happy to share a bed with each other and it's going to be a bit tricky to go away for a boys weekend on the boat when you tell them 2 have got to share a berth. So, basically this is a boat for a couple without kids who only have cohabiting friends. That limits it's market somewhat. Doubly irritating because I said exactly the same thing to their market research people

 

[[2068]]

The "three singles" layout of the mid cabin on the SC35 / SC38 makes a lot more sense for families...

dv.

 

[Wiggo]

[ QUOTE ]

Speaking personally, no immediate plans to have four children, hence no requirement for tri-cab. It's meant to be a pleasure boat (think big beds), not a ferry /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif

dv.

[/ QUOTE ]
There speaks the voice of a man who has clearly never tried to explain to a teenage girl that she's expected to share a double bed with her teenage brother...

 

[Garryt]

I imagine if this is a walk through, there will be other options to consider. I dare say that the option of twin beds for the fwd cabin wouldn't be too difficult to offer.

I suppose until there's a definitive release spec, none of us really know!

 

[Nick_H]

i'd be surprised if the front cabin doesn't have splitting beds by the time the boat reaches production

 

[[2068]]

I can see that wouldn't work too well /forums/images/graemlins/blush.gif

Only have one pup so far, aged four, so more portable in some respects.

 

[Wiggo]

My lad has now decided he prefers 'camping' on the flybridge at night with the tonneau up, so that's won us one berth...