volvopaul
Well-known member
Oh yes .Does someone have her direct email address.
Glad to see the initiative to resolve this outside the domain of Volvo Penta however. Think I wil be sticking with my Cummins though.
Oh yes .Does someone have her direct email address.
Glad to see the initiative to resolve this outside the domain of Volvo Penta however. Think I wil be sticking with my Cummins though.
I think that's the third time you've made a that point in this thread alone.....Think I wil be sticking with my Cummins though.
True maybe they are gonna pull a blinder very soon and blitz’s the market with ( smaller which is where they are ) hybrid propulsion.So no consciousness about trying to quietly drop support old polluting yesterdays engines .Maybe Greta has got to them and they will quietly back out of the diesel burning market
But I think the thread is missing an obvious point, these ECU's are crap and fail regularly costing 000's to replace, do we really want Volvo to produce more of the same?
Hopefully they will look on here and see that over 15k people have looked at this thread.......but then again, maybe they simply do not give a fig, after all customer service is only an imagined reality I suspect
Perhaps if every single interested party wrote to her, she would get the message.
Is there any way to bring this to wider media attention by writing letters to be published in all the boating journals ?
I do hope that what Petem has found can be engineered for use on our boats - it would be 1-0 victory to the small man against the corporation.
He dosnt know weather he is Cumins or going.I think that's the third time you've made a that point in this thread alone.....
Your wife.Who told you I was a 'small man' !
Anyhow, we're on it now. Watch this space.
Moderator! Another week off for that oneYour wife.
Has the same ecu so yes .A friend of mine is looking at a boat with TAMD 72 EDC’s. Are these subject to similar issues or are they mechanical engines?
Don't tell me, you'll stick with your Cummins!Deleted - can't be bothered.
Most of your posts here seem quite reasonable, but now a second thread response by you attempting to bully me on a public forum - WTF did I do ?Don't tell me, you'll stick with your Cummins!
Seriously, I am under no illusions about Volvo engines being perfect but the oily bits of the KAD and TAMD engine do seem to be durable and fit for purpose. Yeah, the ancillaries (turbos, coolers, etc) are a bit crap but there are now lots of pattern parts meaning that you're not totally reliant on VP for replacements. And the great thing about owning a green engine is that there are literally 10's of thousands of people with the same engines meaning there is a viable and profitable after market for parts.
Regarding the mechanical versus electronic engine debate, I would certainly not be critical of any purely mechanical engine. But electronic engines do have some benefits, fly by wire throttles, better fuel economy and performance, diagnostics, and monitoring that will stop the engine if it's overheating, etc.
Back to ECU's, the more I look into this, the more I think that it is a simple job to get a third party ECU working. And a non VP ECU could actually be far more superior to the Volvo OEM part. Adding the following features would be relatively straightforward:
1) Support for OBD2
2) Out of the box NMEA 2000 interface to chart plotters
3) Additional inputs (e.g. EGT)
Not to mention that they could be sold much cheaper than OEM parts and could be repairable (no horrible potting). Plus they could be mounted on a bulkhead (and not be shaken to death on the engine).
Seriously, anyone who thinks that a quarter of a £billion plus worth of engines will be written off because VP can't be arsed to supply ECU's needs their head examined.