ean_p
Well-Known Member
Whats the state of play in Belfast, either Main or Belfast Docks?My lot are almost exactly the same size, and I keep a note of dry docks that will take one, just in case. But we seem to manage with two tugs, not a flotilla.
Whats the state of play in Belfast, either Main or Belfast Docks?My lot are almost exactly the same size, and I keep a note of dry docks that will take one, just in case. But we seem to manage with two tugs, not a flotilla.
So...a simple question...those that kept extolling the short comings of the ship, both in design and construction...are you satisfied now that it was an accident (whether human error or not)? Or do you still blame the ship?
Fair commentsAs Zhou Enlai said, when asked if the French Revolution had been a success, “It’s too early to tell.”
We will have to wait until she’s dry docked, and then interpret the wall of lies from the MOD.
The only thing she could have hit, given where she was when the damage was reported, would be a submarine. She might have clouted something on the way out of Pompey.
Otherwise, it’s a build fault or a design fault.
These ships were put together by people with no experience of big ship construction. No ships of this (actually quite modest) size had been built in the UK for twenty years. And we know there was a shaft alignment issue (covered up) on the sister. So I don’t rule out a design or construction fault. The people who threw these ships together gave us the Type 45s, remember?
Whats the state of play in Belfast, either Main or Belfast Docks?
The boat can't help that it wasn't constructed on Tyneside and is therefore an inferior boat.
If we ask that Mr Macron nicely I reckon Dunkerque could sort it out. Much closer than the others so less to go wrong en route.
It would be a perfect opportunity for her to discover if M Macron is friend or foe…….Docks 2 and 3 at Brest are ULCC size, currently available, and nearer. Or would that be too much for the Daily Mail and the Prime Minister in waiting?
Physically yes but politically?Dock 6 can take her.
Could the folk at the BBC not find a picture of her "setting off"? Next they'll be saying she limped into port...
View attachment 141918
HMS Prince of Wales may miss US jet trials after breakdown
Yes, it was built (Thrown together) at Rosyth, due back there in 4 months for 'refit' - after 5 years in service????? Talk of bringing it forward.Does England not have a dry dock big enough?![]()
Or the Engineering Officer????I wonder which of the Officers is feeling a right charlie...
- Navigator
- Officer of the Watch
- Captain
- Medical Officer
One wonders who "Had the Ship".![]()
When did Rosyth migrate to England?Yes, it was built (Thrown together) at Rosyth, due back there in 4 months for 'refit' - after 5 years in service????? Talk of bringing it forward.
Not ironic, lucky; if she hadn't run aground she'd probably be on the bottom with them, a dozen or so Hurricanes would not have held off 90 bombers.Slightly ironic that the previous HMS Prince of Wales and HMS Repulse were lost off Malaya in Dec 1941 for lack of air cover.
HMS Indomitable, the aircraft carrier assigned to group G had had to dry dock after running aground in Jamaica…..
There are DDs which could be made fit for the carriers but that isn't a priority for MoD(a mistake IMO); KGV in Southampton, Inchgreen in Greenock, No5 dock at Cammell Laird will all fit the hull, but may need changes to accommodate the sponsons etc. There is the big dock in H&W, but IIRC the RN haven't liked sending things to Belfast since an RFA refit went a bit wrong. The industrial strategy still has holes in, Rosyth is not and should never have been considered viable for emergency docking, Between tides and sniffing either the bottom or dock walls it's too hard to get the carriers in and out.I can answer that, I think: no.
CarefullyWonder how and where you draw the prop shaft on an ACC
Perhaps that’s why you need a dry dock twice as long as the carrierWonder how and where you draw the prop shaft on an ACC