mrangry
Well-Known Member
I think you are confusing building standards with fire risk assessmentOr you could just let developers do whatever they want.
Just don't complain about it when they cut corners and we have more Grenfell fires.
I think you are confusing building standards with fire risk assessmentOr you could just let developers do whatever they want.
Just don't complain about it when they cut corners and we have more Grenfell fires.
I think you are confusing building standards with fire risk assessment
Any scheme would have to be workable. How can you regulate for portable heaters or generators?Fair enough but a small inboard diesel engine or even gen set can produce many times more CO than a diesel heater yet they would be exempt for regulation?
It's all regulations though which you seem to think are a waste of time.Indeed he is
It's all regulations though which you seem to think are a waste of time.
Doesn't alter my core argument though.
For the boat, I've got perhaps 10 years of service history filed away plus insurance docs, registration docs, etc. all filed.Here is a simple question for you. With regard to your boat and Home have you got all the paperwork neatly filed away.
For the boat, I've got perhaps 10 years of service history filed away plus insurance docs, registration docs, etc. all filed.
For the house, I have building regs docs, doors and window guarantees, electrical certificates, etc all filed. Mainly because not having them would add cost and delay when the time comes to sell the house.
Might be easy to achieve using the small ships register and extending the inland scheme. There'd be great resistance, but everyone would learn of it. History shows it often takes a tragedy (or brown envelopes) for MP's to gain the political will to put something sensible into law.It also occurs to me that some people who predominantly boat on inland waterways in the UK are not aware that Boat Safety Certificates do not apply generally to boats on Coastal Waters. So adding heater installs into the Scheme would not achieve much.
This is where I am a little lost , as to introduce legislation I would have expected there to have been a large number of incidents and failures relating to this and we simply haven't seen this. Effort into legislating and regulating is usually borne from experience of failures and risk. All I can see this doing is introducing needless cost for boat/camper van owners and completely unenforceable.Might be easy to achieve using the small ships register and extending the inland scheme. There'd be great resistance, but everyone would learn of it. History shows it often takes a tragedy (or brown envelopes) for MP's to gain the political will to put something sensible into law.
I don't keep a record or anything but there's a steady turnover of preventable deaths due to CO. How many is too many?This is where I am a little lost , as to introduce legislation I would have expected there to have been a large number of incidents and failures relating to this and we simply haven't seen this. Effort into legislating and regulating is usually borne from experience of failures and risk. All I can see this doing is introducing needless cost for boat/camper van owners and completely unenforceable.
Ah okay, I just assumed that given that you advocate regulation in this area you may have empirical knowledge of such statistics. As tragic as any preventable death is, our lives will always encounter an element of risk that cannot be totally eliminated and any such regulation would normally be risk driven.I don't keep a record or anything but there's a steady turnover of preventable deaths due to CO.
How many electrocutions? Who knows do they ever make headlines nowadays?
Safety warning about carbon monoxide poisoning after the loss of 2 lives on the motor cruiser Diversion
Fair enough but a small inboard diesel engine or even gen set can produce many times more CO than a diesel heater yet they would be exempt for regulation?
A good example of poor regulationHGV refridgerated trailer gensets are exempt from latest emission regs, so you get a Euro6 truck pulling a trailer that can be chucking out way more emissions than the truck itself running around in a LEZ or ULEZ.
In fact the genset engines are such an old design I would guess they are Euro3 at best, on cars that would be pre 2006 spec.
This is where I am a little lost , as to introduce legislation I would have expected there to have been a large number of incidents and failures relating to this and we simply haven't seen this. Effort into legislating and regulating is usually borne from experience of failures and risk. All I can see this doing is introducing needless cost for boat/camper van owners and completely unenforceable.
No, it isn't that FB page so don't assume...........the clue is not.....oh jeez, here we go again!Ah I see.... so you refer to a group called "Chinese diesel vehicle air heaters - troubleshooting", of which I am a member. I would suggest that the clue for you is in the name of the group. It is hardly going to attract people looking to praise their installations is it?
If you care to take some time to look online you will also find many critical of the branded heaters which also suffer from the same issues, the only difference being is that the cost of parts for these branded units is prohibitive.