JorgeinLondon
New member
I agree entirely and have raised this at at many TNUF meetings. Just one highly visible instance of apparent inaction does indeed create a perception that the EA are not applying enforcement activity without fear or favour and is not the message we wish to see going out to river users.
What would you suggest we do about it? I and others have continued to raise the whole issue of unregistered craft at every TNUF meeting in recent years. The response is always the same - only so much money available to do everything required of them and it costs money to pursue delinquents. Removing a boat from the river has to be paid for and no guarantees that costs will be recovered. I know of cases where local authority and EA are each waiting and hoping that the other will decide to proceed first.
This is an interesting site:
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/abandoned-vehicles-council-responsibilities
This is obviously applicable to cars, but why can't it work with boats? The council picks them up after warning the registered owner, then they can dispose of it by selling it. Surely this will help pay for the admin and activities and the whole thing may break even?
Could keep a lot of older men happy in sheds for years with all those restoration jobs.
:encouragement: