Neeves
Well-known member
I suspect that most people who have bike accidents don't hit their head - but the ones that do will surely be grateful they wore a helmet.But you are taking my comment about helmets being commonplace in junior kids sailing out of context - this was in reply to a post suggesting “it’s surprising that sailing has never had a similar focus”.
As has already been stated earlier, there are helmets designed and used at the top end of the racing - eg Sail GP - designed for maximum protection. If a helmet can now avoid most head injuries in F1 crashes, there is no doubt that a well designed helmet could hugely increase likelihood of a safe outcome even in the 40 foot boat example you quote. Like bike and motorcycle helmets, they may not give 100% prevention of fatalities, but could reduce by 80% or so.
The issue with helmets for sail racing - or more positively the good thing - is that whilst tragic these accidents are still quite rare in terms of participants and miles sailed, hence many might choose not to wear them.
For cruising sailors, one important starting point is choosing a boat where the mainsheet is ahead of the hatchway, avoiding the mainsheet issue which seems to account for a substantial proportion of the fatalities.
Surely on a cruising boat helmets would be treated similarly to LJs and harnesses mandated when the skipper thinks they become necessary and enough carried to protect the crew. Most of the cases of heads suffering damage due to booms probably go unreported, because no-one dies. But the reason helmets are mandated for many sports is simply the long term effects of injuries, boxing, contact sports, etc in schools. All the arborists I know of, who go up the tree, all wear helmets, similarly many, but not all, on the ground.
It would be interesting to know what motivated the need for helmets for Sail GP, I'm not aware that anyone died, I don't recall reports of 'accidents'. Its a fast moving sport and I can see the need - but I similarly see the need for sailing though more so in rough weather and mark rounding during a race.
I am conscious that helmets should be mandated for anyone up a mast at sea, then you focus more on getting a job done quickly and not quite so worried about turning your brain to porridge. Similarly they should be mandated if anyone needs to go overboard to help an incapacitated MOB - being hit on the head by a plunging hull is not much fun. We all do MOB drills - how many boats carry a helmet.
Helmets should not only be worn to minimise death but to reduce concussion - as the latter is long term and insidious.
The second death, the first was from being hit on the head by the boom, was caused by the individual being thrown and hitting his head on a winch (and winches have dangerous 'edges., the top of the winch). Its not only a mainsheet, or boom, that can throw a crew member off balance - but its really only the skull, or head, that is vulnerable.
If you read the report of the MOB on the Hobart race the individual was conscious and was able to turn his body such that his back was toward the seas - but he still swallowed seawater and threw it up when he was rescued. If he had hit his head before going overboard - and was unconscious - he would probably have drowned - another reason to wear a helmet.
The good result from the Hobart race - if you can call it good - is that there should be enquiries as to what went wrong and what went right - maybe attitudes will change.
But helmets are for wimps - it will take decades for there to be changes. Who wants to be a pansy and wear a helmet on a yacht.
Jonathan
Last edited: