Ian_Rob
Well-known member
That’s just the thing it does seem good on the surface but real science suggests it’s not. Eelgrass does capture carbon but the full lifecycle sees this turned into methane which is orders of magnitude worse for the environment. If global warming is what we’re fixing then actually removing eelgrass and rainforests is a better way to go. Of course that causes other issues in other systems so we shouldn’t do that. The only real conclusion I can draw is we should do nothing other than reduce population size. At the very least we should stop paying people to have kids.
As eelgrass is susceptible to disease that can kill it off - as it was in the 1930’s - it would be ludicrous to rely on it for permanent CO2 capture anyway.
Last edited: