Studland Anchoring

Ian_Rob

Well-known member
Joined
31 Jan 2008
Messages
1,161
Visit site
That’s just the thing it does seem good on the surface but real science suggests it’s not. Eelgrass does capture carbon but the full lifecycle sees this turned into methane which is orders of magnitude worse for the environment. If global warming is what we’re fixing then actually removing eelgrass and rainforests is a better way to go. Of course that causes other issues in other systems so we shouldn’t do that. The only real conclusion I can draw is we should do nothing other than reduce population size. At the very least we should stop paying people to have kids.

As eelgrass is susceptible to disease that can kill it off - as it was in the 1930’s - it would be ludicrous to rely on it for permanent CO2 capture anyway.
 
Last edited:

st599

Well-known member
Joined
9 Jan 2006
Messages
7,570
Visit site
Just noticed, on my iPhone, Navionics plasters the words ‘Marine Conservation Zone’ over the whole of Studland Bay- but there’s no zone or areas marked. Jennycliffe and Cawsand have nothing marked.

Have I not got the correct settings?

The entire bay is a Marine Conservation Zone.

Just ignore it, nearly everyone else seems to be when I have been out.

Then it will go from Voluntary to Mandatory.
 

Chris CJ

Active member
Joined
30 Nov 2020
Messages
120
Visit site
An interesting article published this morning on Swanage News : Southampton uni , National trust , RYA and Studland Parish council , planet swanage , have sponsored a robotic study of the sea grass to start this month to gain greater understanding of growth of sea grasses to enable how sea grasses can thrive and mooring can accommodate.
it’s a step in the right direction , providing when the results are available NE acknowledge and accept the findings , hopefully conceding with this new data there might be a better solution to the one embarked on
 

oldharry

Well-known member
Joined
30 May 2001
Messages
9,956
Location
North from the Nab about 10 miles
Visit site
Thanks Tranona for your succinct summary of the issues. Spot on specially the 'new religion' aspect, of which NE are the great High Priests, endowed with total infallibility! Anyone who dares disagree is automatically 'cast into outer darkness' and ignored.

Hedgehog 2,: Navionics is correct. The WHOLE bay is an MCZ. The VNAZ applies only to a defined area of the MCZ in which the FOCI. (features of conservation interest) are focussed. Just be glad it doesn't extend across the entirety of Poole Bay as originally planned!
 

doug748

Well-known member
Joined
1 Oct 2002
Messages
13,356
Location
UK. South West.
Visit site
An interesting article published this morning on Swanage News : Southampton uni , National trust , RYA and Studland Parish council , planet swanage , have sponsored a robotic study of the sea grass to start this month to gain greater understanding of growth of sea grasses to enable how sea grasses can thrive and mooring can accommodate.
it’s a step in the right direction , providing when the results are available NE acknowledge and accept the findings , hopefully conceding with this new data there might be a better solution to the one embarked on



The robots were also out in Cawsand Bay Plymouth last week.

Seagrass beds that have been classified as healthy on two previous occasions. It will be interesting to see what the now technology reveals to us. .?


.
 
Top