Silicone antifouling ..... good or useless ?

clyst

Well-known member
Joined
18 Aug 2002
Messages
3,233
Visit site
Iv never met anyone who has used it but pontoon stories have conflicting beliefs even down to some marinas won't lift boats with it because of its slippy nature. Anyone used it ? Regards . .
 

lusitano

Active member
Joined
7 Jun 2011
Messages
360
Visit site
Problem is that if you use it once, you are kinda tied into using it permanently.
Removing it is a nightmare as it very mucky to wet sand, and clogs dry sandpaper almost instantly.
Not sure a barrier/primer coating would work on it either.
 

Neeves

Well-known member
Joined
20 Nov 2011
Messages
13,369
Location
Sydney, Australia.
Visit site
Problem is that if you use it once, you are kinda tied into using it permanently.
Removing it is a nightmare as it very mucky to wet sand, and clogs dry sandpaper almost instantly.
Not sure a barrier/primer coating would work on it either.

This is a major issue. There is not much 'independent' comment. Application is not difficult but laborious. Fine if it works - but nothing sticks to the surface subsequently (except foulings). Some commercial ships used it and have reverted to conventional paints. Like other AF it still relies on vessel movement - but if you have a build up of slime the fouling stick to the slime and ignore the silicone.

Many people who have tried or used it are supported by the manufacturer.

The technology and trials have been run for over 10 years - acceptance is low. If it was a resounding success you would not need to ask the question.

Jonathan
 

greeny

Well-known member
Joined
15 Jun 2004
Messages
2,466
Location
Portugal
Visit site
I saw a large-ish commercial fishing boat, probably 80 or 90 ft lifted out at Portimao last week. It came out absolutely clean of anything on the hull except the large cooling plates and some other metal bits were covered in mussel like clams. The hull that had the silicone a/foul on was prestine condition. Obviously a fishing boat is probably in constant use so a perfect situation for this type of a/foul.
 

Hot Property

Well-known member
Joined
11 Aug 2015
Messages
2,136
Location
Hamble
Visit site
I've now used Silicone on my new RIB to great effect. Previous boat gained 1.5 knots as a result of using it.

First application is a bit long winded but in years 2 and 3 I just touched up areas where there was physical abrasions. It would have lasted another year but I sold the boat. Year 5 would just be 1 full coat required.

Really good on semi and full planing boats.

For yachts it will acquire slime but easy to wash off.

No connection with Hempel!
 

Chiara’s slave

Well-known member
Joined
14 Apr 2022
Messages
8,050
Location
Western Solent
Visit site
A condensed chapter and verse ....
Worked in the first season, mostly, with weekly dive and spongeing. Second season, went backwards through the fleet, from second generally to second from last. Spores had remained in the coating, sprouted when she hit the water. No scrubbing could remove it. Eventually we hand scraped, then sanded to bare wood, re epoxied, primed, conventional antifoul, won first race back in the water. The stripping was truly horrendous. Threw away a Bosch sander afterwards, full of silicone dust.
I have photos, I’ll have a dig later
 

Chiara’s slave

Well-known member
Joined
14 Apr 2022
Messages
8,050
Location
Western Solent
Visit site
Last time I removed ' ordinary ' AF it wasn't an easy job!
No it‘s not. We stripped 20 years worth off our Dragonfly last year. But that’s 3 x 30ft. An XOD is a compact 20 footer, it takes about 6 hours to strip conventional AF on that, on your own, a regular job on a race boat. That 3 days is just to strip. Surface prep was on top, plus the new coatings. Never again, is where I stand on it.
 

Chiara’s slave

Well-known member
Joined
14 Apr 2022
Messages
8,050
Location
Western Solent
Visit site
got a bit random in order there but you’ll get the idea
 

Attachments

  • E7EE12A6-954C-4A97-B223-2A7724080F45.jpeg
    E7EE12A6-954C-4A97-B223-2A7724080F45.jpeg
    136.7 KB · Views: 50
  • 12F7BFF5-938F-4358-A3F8-1AE2377CAC61.jpeg
    12F7BFF5-938F-4358-A3F8-1AE2377CAC61.jpeg
    96.5 KB · Views: 49
  • 909924A5-3C56-410F-BE4D-714CA07A840F.jpeg
    909924A5-3C56-410F-BE4D-714CA07A840F.jpeg
    126.7 KB · Views: 48
  • 1B989734-CFC3-438C-8E3B-D10D9D27E013.jpeg
    1B989734-CFC3-438C-8E3B-D10D9D27E013.jpeg
    91.7 KB · Views: 49

AntarcticPilot

Well-known member
Joined
4 May 2007
Messages
10,720
Location
Cambridge, UK
www.cooperandyau.co.uk
Bottom line is that it only works for a vessel in almost constant motion at a speed of around 8 knots or higher. It won't work for a boat that spends most of its time stationary or moving at speeds below that.
 

Chiara’s slave

Well-known member
Joined
14 Apr 2022
Messages
8,050
Location
Western Solent
Visit site
Bottom line is that it only works for a vessel in almost constant motion at a speed of around 8 knots or higher. It won't work for a boat that spends most of its time stationary or moving at speeds below that.
Absolutely. We bought our X with the silicone on. And when it’s new it is very slippery. I would never have put it on, myself.
 
Top