Seadog 30 vs Pentland

Bodach na mara

Well-known member
Joined
21 Aug 2002
Messages
2,667
Location
Western Scotland
Visit site
As Steve said in post #20. I can't say anything about the Seadog although I wanted one, but as they were like hen's teeth I looked at Westerlies and settled on the fin keel version of the 31 footers, the Renown. This is the same as the Pentland apart from the keel and I had one for 19 years. It sailed well, motored well and was comfortable to cruise aboard and we loved it. In fact we often wish that we still had it.
 

ashtead

Well-known member
Joined
17 Jun 2008
Messages
6,372
Location
Surrey and Gosport UK
Visit site
The 1970s westerly version at26 and 31 ft all motored well and while the sailing wasn’t on the edge you always arrived safely - I think of a passage through the Owers in a Force 6 in a centaur -rather time consuming but we reached Brighton I recall eventually .
 

onesea

Well-known member
Joined
28 Oct 2011
Messages
3,828
Location
Solent based..
Visit site
Your brain should say
Pentland: good accommodation, known brand, holds value should be afew around so you might get choice.

Your heart might say
Seadog:
Looks just that little bit special, a sailers choice, like some one who buys a Saab or Alfa Romeo. They like to be out of the box.

I would follow your heart.
 

onesea

Well-known member
Joined
28 Oct 2011
Messages
3,828
Location
Solent based..
Visit site
Absolutely. Do your due diligence with your head to make sure the boat's sound, but one day, a boat will just wink at you and say, Buy me.
That was with the assumption of all other things being equal.

Which in the boating word rarely is so he's just as likely to end up with a Moody. As in the rational boating manner when choosing between a westerly or a seadog all other parts being equal will make you choose a Southerly 115.
 

Graham376

Well-known member
Joined
15 Apr 2018
Messages
7,766
Location
Boat on Mooring off Faro, Home near Abergele
Visit site
As Steve said in post #20. I can't say anything about the Seadog although I wanted one, but as they were like hen's teeth I looked at Westerlies and settled on the fin keel version of the 31 footers, the Renown. This is the same as the Pentland apart from the keel and I had one for 19 years. It sailed well, motored well and was comfortable to cruise aboard and we loved it. In fact we often wish that we still had it.

We also had another variant of the Westerly 31 foot hull, a Berwick, twin keels like the Pentland but aft cockpit. Took good care of us bashing around the Irish Sea for several years, only sold because we wanted larger boat.
 

bitbaltic

Well-known member
Joined
21 Nov 2011
Messages
2,681
Location
Boat in Milford Haven
sailingkarisma.wordpress.com
That was with the assumption of all other things being equal.

Which in the boating word rarely is so he's just as likely to end up with a Moody. As in the rational boating manner when choosing between a westerly or a seadog all other parts being equal will make you choose a Southerly 115.
Your brain should say
Pentland: good accommodation, known brand, holds value should be afew around so you might get choice.

Your heart might say
Seadog:
Looks just that little bit special, a sailers choice, like some one who buys a Saab or Alfa Romeo. They like to be out of the box.

I would follow your heart.
I have a small fast cruiser that is absolutely nothing like a seadog or a pentland or whatever.

However I drove an old Saab for 20 years and would have one again if it was a practical daily driver.

A couple of years ago I was on Dale pontoon next to a proper old salt who had a tough, traditional, budget boat and was sailing around the U.K. and absolutely loving it. I thought the boat looked fantastic for those purposes and asked what it was. It was a sea dog.

I’d unhesitatingly buy one.

All the usual caveats about age, engines, sails, but that is a ******* fantastic boat.
 

oldharry

Well-known member
Joined
30 May 2001
Messages
9,942
Location
North from the Nab about 10 miles
Visit site
Ketch or Bermudan rig? Hasnt been discussed here. Ketch is more verasatile in that you can douse the main altogether and keep going in almost anything with just a small jib and the manageably sized mizzen. On the other hand it is a lot more work than the standard bermudan rig.

I knew a man with a Seadog who did RTW in his own time quite comfortably in it. Bitbaltic sums it up well as a tough, traditional budget boat. Not by any means the fastest, but pretty well guaranteed to look after you when the going gets tough. Westerley? I dont know them personally, but again a tough well built boat witha good pedigree, and from what I gather a better turn of speed.

If a Lady is involved in this project, listen to what she says about the accomodation. The classic feminist joke 'this boats no good, the mirror is in the wrong place' actually reveals an instinctive 'feel' sailing ladies have about a particular vessel you are viewing!
 

Bodach na mara

Well-known member
Joined
21 Aug 2002
Messages
2,667
Location
Western Scotland
Visit site
You missed the best bit about ketch versus Bermudan oldharry. On a ketch it is impossible to fall overboard from the cockpit. There is so much rigging that any bird larger than a budgie finds it impossible to escape.
 

jwilson

Well-known member
Joined
22 Jul 2006
Messages
6,107
Visit site
Most owners of ketches like the Seadog regard dropping the main entirely as the first reef, and there is lot to be said for that. Seadog very deep cockpit with a windscreen, and really strongly built. Westerlys a bit more modern and lighter (not that Westerlys are remotely flimsy!).
 

steve yates

Well-known member
Joined
16 Oct 2014
Messages
3,860
Location
Benfleet, Essex/Keswick, Cumbria
Visit site
Get the best pf both worlds, find a westerly pembroke/longbow/renown/berwick ( same boat basically, different configs) in a ketch version :)
But actually, I looked at a seadog with my mate, ( he bought a twister in the end) and Iwould have bought that one happily if I hadnt already had a westerly ketch.
just get the best fettled and eqipped of whatever of the marques you can find. Then go sailing :)
 

dancrane

Well-known member
Joined
29 Dec 2010
Messages
10,288
Visit site
Seadog 30 or westerly Pentland? I’m 30, presently own a macwester 26...a great little boat however after more than a few experiences in some serious weather I’ve came to the conclusion I would like a heavily built centre cockpit “brick outhouse!”.
Interesting question, which prompts queries in reply.

What are you wanting from your preferred vessel, relative to those you owned before? The 'brick outhouse' preference suggests solidity commonly associated with heavy motorsailer styles, which do feature on your list. Those also offer a helm with full protection from the weather (but aren't the only designs that do). Conversely, there are open-cockpit 'brick outhouse' yachts which don't offer much (if any) weather protection.

Important to be realistic about exactly what you (and whoever you hope will come with you) will be happy to endure.

How limiting is the cost factor? I noticed you included the Konsort Duo. It's costlier than most others you listed, but the only one designed mainly to make just a couple comfortable, and thereby (very unusually) manages to be a sub-30ft yacht that is always nice - almost luxurious - to be aboard.

For 20 years after it ceased production, I was dismissive of the not-pretty Konsort Duo. Finally I realised how adroit its design is for thousands of UK sailors, who don't even recognise the fact, or choose not to. Most skippers usually sail only with their spouse, and motor a high proportion of their passages in grotty weather. For them, open-cockpit boats with berths for six are comfortless and their layouts irrelevant.

53431376278_99a901bbcb_c.jpg


I assume the Konsort Duo's superstructure discouraged more orders than it attracted, but the traditional motorboat visibility from inside allows a quite different approach to yachting, combining best of sailing in fine weather (because it's not based on a heavy trawler-style) but letting all miserable weather and contrary winds be treated as motoring days - get to a windward destination under power in a fraction the time, without even going outside.

I quite like the the Seadog, but it seems to go most of the way to being a motorsailer without offering a weatherproof helm. It also seems to be acknowledged by owners as dreadfully slow. Cute original design and layout though (pics from Yachtsnet).

53431351439_9488fefde0_z.jpg


The Pentland ketch is appealing, but its narrow B-layout-Centaur-style saloon (galley forward, starboard side) removes the snug port-and-starboard forward sitting space that Westerly themselves replaced it with, in the Griffin. I couldn't own a boat whose saloon feels like a corridor.

53431374519_77a2777b6e_z.jpg


Personally, I wouldn't bother with the Seadog or Pentland, for the following inescapable reason.

Our unreliable climate ensures our being frequently rained on, wind-blown and routinely chilled to the bone, often in months when it isn't expected. You're still young enough to stay free of (or you may already be ingrained by) the commonplace view here - that sailing isn't really sailing unless you happily (or just doggedly) endure dismal weather that you would never have set off in.

If your choice is inspired by brochure photos of yachts in ideal conditions, try to get wise to that illusion - it rarely applies, especially if you're of working age and busy when the weather's at its best. But...if you buy a boat that you can steer on deck when the weather's fine, and can retreat to helm indoors when it's not fine, the boat will get more (and much happier) use across the seasons, giving better value for the cost of ownership. (y)
.
 
Last edited:

Stemar

Well-known member
Joined
12 Sep 2001
Messages
23,682
Location
Home - Southampton, Boat - Gosport
Visit site
dancrane's got it right about the Konsort Duo. For a couple who don't race and don't mind using the engine when conditions aren't right for sailing, I don't think you could do better. I had a nose around one once and thought that if the budget allowed, I'd buy one tomorrow. Actually, I reckon it would sail better than you might expect. It's only got a tiny bit less sail area than the Konsort, which doesn't do badly at all. Cruiser rather than racer, but still a sailing boat and I'd be surprised if it didn't sail rings round the Seadog.
 

oldmanofthehills

Well-known member
Joined
13 Aug 2010
Messages
5,099
Location
Bristol / Cornwall
Visit site
Interesting question, which prompts queries in reply.

What are you wanting from your preferred vessel, relative to those you owned before? The 'brick outhouse' preference suggests solidity commonly associated with heavy motorsailer styles, which do feature on your list. Those also offer a helm with full protection from the weather (but aren't the only designs that do). Conversely, there are open-cockpit 'brick outhouse' yachts which don't offer much (if any) weather protection.

Important to be realistic about exactly what you (and whoever you hope will come with you) will be happy to endure.

How limiting is the cost factor? I noticed you included the Konsort Duo. It's costlier than most others you listed, but the only one designed mainly to make just a couple comfortable, and thereby (very unusually) manages to be a sub-30ft yacht that is always nice - almost luxurious - to be aboard.

For 20 years after it ceased production, I was dismissive of the not-pretty Konsort Duo. Finally I realised how adroit its design is for thousands of UK sailors, who don't even recognise the fact, or choose not to. Most skippers usually sail only with their spouse, and motor a high proportion of their passages in grotty weather. For them, open-cockpit boats with berths for six are comfortless and their layouts irrelevant.

53431376278_99a901bbcb_c.jpg


I assume the Konsort Duo's superstructure discouraged more orders than it attracted, but the traditional motorboat visibility from inside allows a quite different approach to yachting, combining best of sailing in fine weather (because it's not based on a heavy trawler-style) but letting all miserable weather and contrary winds be treated as motoring days - get to a windward destination under power in a fraction the time, without even going outside.

I quite like the the Seadog, but it seems to go most of the way to being a motorsailer without offering a weatherproof helm. It also seems to be acknowledged by owners as dreadfully slow. Cute original design and layout though (pics from Yachtsnet).

53431351439_9488fefde0_z.jpg


The Pentland ketch is appealing, but its narrow B-layout-Centaur-style saloon (galley forward, starboard side) removes the snug port-and-starboard forward sitting space that Westerly themselves replaced it with, in the Griffin. I couldn't own a boat whose saloon feels like a corridor.

53431374519_77a2777b6e_z.jpg


Personally, I wouldn't bother with the Seadog or Pentland, for the following inescapable reason.

Our unreliable climate ensures our being frequently rained on, wind-blown and routinely chilled to the bone, often in months when it isn't expected. You're still young enough to stay free of (or you may already be ingrained by) the commonplace view here - that sailing isn't really sailing unless you happily (or just doggedly) endure dismal weather that you would never have set off in.

If your choice is inspired by brochure photos of yachts in ideal conditions, try to get wise to that illusion - it rarely applies, especially if you're of working age and busy when the weather's at its best. But...if you buy a boat that you can steer on deck when the weather's fine, and can retreat to helm indoors when it's not fine, the boat will get more (and much happier) use across the seasons, giving better value for the cost of ownership. (y)
.

Interesting question, which prompts queries in reply.

What are you wanting from your preferred vessel, relative to those you owned before? The 'brick outhouse' preference suggests solidity commonly associated with heavy motorsailer styles, which do feature on your list. Those also offer a helm with full protection from the weather (but aren't the only designs that do). Conversely, there are open-cockpit 'brick outhouse' yachts which don't offer much (if any) weather protection.

Important to be realistic about exactly what you (and whoever you hope will come with you) will be happy to endure.

How limiting is the cost factor? I noticed you included the Konsort Duo. It's costlier than most others you listed, but the only one designed mainly to make just a couple comfortable, and thereby (very unusually) manages to be a sub-30ft yacht that is always nice - almost luxurious - to be aboard.

For 20 years after it ceased production, I was dismissive of the not-pretty Konsort Duo. Finally I realised how adroit its design is for thousands of UK sailors, who don't even recognise the fact, or choose not to. Most skippers usually sail only with their spouse, and motor a high proportion of their passages in grotty weather. For them, open-cockpit boats with berths for six are comfortless and their layouts irrelevant.

53431376278_99a901bbcb_c.jpg


I assume the Konsort Duo's superstructure discouraged more orders than it attracted, but the traditional motorboat visibility from inside allows a quite different approach to yachting, combining best of sailing in fine weather (because it's not based on a heavy trawler-style) but letting all miserable weather and contrary winds be treated as motoring days - get to a windward destination under power in a fraction the time, without even going outside.

I quite like the the Seadog, but it seems to go most of the way to being a motorsailer without offering a weatherproof helm. It also seems to be acknowledged by owners as dreadfully slow. Cute original design and layout though (pics from Yachtsnet).

53431351439_9488fefde0_z.jpg


The Pentland ketch is appealing, but its narrow B-layout-Centaur-style saloon (galley forward, starboard side) removes the snug port-and-starboard forward sitting space that Westerly themselves replaced it with, in the Griffin. I couldn't own a boat whose saloon feels like a corridor.

53431374519_77a2777b6e_z.jpg


Personally, I wouldn't bother with the Seadog or Pentland, for the following inescapable reason.

Our unreliable climate ensures our being frequently rained on, wind-blown and routinely chilled to the bone, often in months when it isn't expected. You're still young enough to stay free of (or you may already be ingrained by) the commonplace view here - that sailing isn't really sailing unless you happily (or just doggedly) endure dismal weather that you would never have set off in.

If your choice is inspired by brochure photos of yachts in ideal conditions, try to get wise to that illusion - it rarely applies, especially if you're of working age and busy when the weather's at its best. But...if you buy a boat that you can steer on deck when the weather's fine, and can retreat to helm indoors when it's not fine, the boat will get more (and much happier) use across the seasons, giving better value for the cost of ownership. (y)
.


A pentland for rough weather and here is our old pentland in turbulent water off Ilfracombe in a fading F6 with big rollers (taken by Coral B who followed us out to Lundy as storm faded. I love the comfort of our present LM27 but she is not as sea worthy as the pentland. Badly drained cockpit and non-locking cockpit engine hatches plus big voids from cockpit to bilge. I never feared being pooped in pentland but look at breaking following seas with concern on LM. Of course if you can afford an LM30 or LM32 Scanyacht 290 they had sorted all that and doesnt roll as much.

I was tempted by Seadog 30 and would have completed encolosure of cockpit but Navigator thought LM27 prettier inside and out which it is
 

Attachments

  • Coral B 182 slightly rough leaving ilfracombe-900k.jpg
    Coral B 182 slightly rough leaving ilfracombe-900k.jpg
    836.1 KB · Views: 28

oldmanofthehills

Well-known member
Joined
13 Aug 2010
Messages
5,099
Location
Bristol / Cornwall
Visit site
And I miss our ketch rig. Saw a single hander win race against faster fully crewed boats by not reefing but dumping as it gusted F7 off Brightlingsea. By the time the others had reefed he was 1/4 mile ahead.

Damn nearly as fast under genny and mizzen alone, and no nasty deckwork if it worsens just the genny furling lines. Heres us in F7 with wave protection from sandbanks
 

Attachments

  • sb3 off nash passage.jpg
    sb3 off nash passage.jpg
    18.5 KB · Views: 26

Supertramp

Well-known member
Joined
18 Jul 2020
Messages
1,022
Location
Halifax
Visit site
And I miss our ketch rig. Saw a single hander win race against faster fully crewed boats by not reefing but dumping as it gusted F7 off Brightlingsea. By the time the others had reefed he was 1/4 mile ahead.

Damn nearly as fast under genny and mizzen alone, and no nasty deckwork if it worsens just the genny furling lines. Heres us in F7 with wave protection from sandbanks
Great pictures. It's hard to explain to non ketch sailors the comfort of a reduced jib and mizzen on a decent displacement hull.
 

Tranona

Well-known member
Joined
10 Nov 2007
Messages
42,330
Visit site
Interesting question, which prompts queries in reply.



How limiting is the cost factor? I noticed you included the Konsort Duo. It's costlier than most others you listed, but the only one designed mainly to make just a couple comfortable, and thereby (very unusually) manages to be a sub-30ft yacht that is always nice - almost luxurious - to be aboard.

For 20 years after it ceased production, I was dismissive of the not-pretty Konsort Duo. Finally I realised how adroit its design is for thousands of UK sailors, who don't even recognise the fact, or choose not to. Most skippers usually sail only with their spouse, and motor a high proportion of their passages in grotty weather. For them, open-cockpit boats with berths for six are comfortless and their layouts irrelevant.

53431376278_99a901bbcb_c.jpg


I assume the Konsort Duo's superstructure discouraged more orders than it attracted, but the traditional motorboat visibility from inside allows a quite different approach to yachting, combining best of sailing in fine weather (because it's not based on a heavy trawler-style) but letting all miserable weather and contrary winds be treated as motoring days - get to a windward destination under power in a fraction the time, without even going outside.
This has been discussed at length many times, and despite your claim that thousands of British yachtsmen are in need of such boats every time mass producers have taken the plunge they have failed to attract buyers. The Konsort Duo, and Moody Eclipse are two shining examples. Heaped with praise, initial rush and within 3 years or so the tiny market has bought one and demand disappeared.

I think your argument falls apart with your statement that a high proportion of passages (for husband and wife teams) are in grotty weather. They are not because sailing is for pleasure for most people and while they may tolerate the odd bad weather they plan passages for good weather. Of course you could argue if they had a boat like this grotty weather would be less of a pain - but there is still plenty of good sailing without planning to go out in bad weather.
 
Top