Proprietors of Bavaria yachts CHECK your kiels

Ships_Cat

New member
Joined
7 Sep 2004
Messages
4,178
Visit site
Re: To Branko ....

I will hang this on Nigel's post, not in response to his post nor to teach him to suck eggs but because it is a convenient place and he is friendly /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif.

There seems to be alot of confusion over what the terminology relating to the classification societies means. I do not know what is on any certificate provided by Bavaria but those that have one (if they exist) may make sense using the following. I will use Lloyds as an example but the other main societies are similar (GL, DNV, etc).

First, they provide general quality certification services ie they can certify organisations as complying with the various quality and environmental standards (generally ISO or EN). This can be in any industry, not just shipbuilding and they compete in providing these services against other, but non marine, certification bodies. So, a reference to Lloyds does not need to mean that a product has been inspected by them or its design approved by them, but just that the production and control processes have been certiied as complying with a quality standard.

Second, for vessels they provide design appraisal services where they appraise and certify the design against their design rules. The vessel may then be claimed as meeting the societies design rules but it is not classified.

Thirdly, the vessel may be classified and that is where the Maltese Cross and 100A1 comes in. It is commonly thought by non professionals that the 100 and A1 have some special high ranking meaning (thinking of 100% and calling fine things "A1" I suppose) but it is in fact just general nomenclature.

The Maltese Cross means that the vessel was built under Survey ie a classification society's surveyor attends during the construction.

The 100 means that the vessel is suitable for seagoing service.

The A means that the vessel has been accepted into class and is being maintained to the class requirements.

And the 1, a surprise to many I am sure, means that the anchoring and mooring equipment complies with class requirements.

There may be other letters added to the classification, common ones for smaller vessels are "LMC" = Propelling and essential machinery built under special survey, and "SSC" = designed and built to Lloyd's (UK Lloyds that is not GL) rules for Special Service Craft.

So when a boatbuilder mentions Lloyds (or another) and says no more, it can mean many things. Often the boatbuilder has no idea of what he means either.

John
 
G

Guest

Guest
To Ships Cat ...

Thank you ... I wasn't going to go into such detail - but you have put into a nutshell ....

Not only do I have a company that is involved with Yacht survey etc. etc. and ships cargoes etc. - but my Brother is a senior Det Norske Veritas Surveyor .... (sort of Norwegian Lloyds .... for those who do not knopw DNV)

ISO 9000, ISO 14000 .... and all the rest are not what the public think they are ..... CE is a conformance not a certificate of Seaworthiness or inspection of a single boat etc. etc.

Cheers
Friendly Nige !!
 

LeonF

Active member
Joined
25 Jun 2001
Messages
1,212
Location
South London
Visit site
Re: To Ships Cat ...

Nigel I remember my first boat, a Fantasie 19 built by Robert Ives yard had Lloyds certification. I remember being most impressed at the time that a highly qualified person had come to check that this tiny boat was being built to a high standard !! Thanks for all your informative postings.
 
Joined
27 May 2002
Messages
11,172
Visit site
[ QUOTE ]
I looked at Bavarias at the boat show...

The best one I came away with was to avoid shrouds in a straight line. If the forestay or backstay goes, so does the mast.


[/ QUOTE ]
Not necessarily, I disconnected the backstay on my Bavaria Match 35 over the week-end and the mast didn’t come crashing down. I am surprised your trained engineer's eye did not spot the contribution made by swept back spreaders to mast support.

A single chain plate attachment point for cap and lower shrouds has some advantages, it allows a yacht designer to focus on creating one strong attachment point to the hull. Yacht designers have struggled with mixed success on this issue for 25 years, ask a Contessa 32 owner. I have high confidence in Bavaria's implementation on my yacht.

Anyhow this whole discussion about rig design is not specific to Bavaria. I think you really wanted to tell us about your doubled-up fore and back stays and then make ignorant comments about Bavarias.

[ QUOTE ]
Someone told me they'd seen a Bavaria capsize in harbour in a flat calm.

That's where the Skoda management went then.

[/ QUOTE ]
Where did British Leyland management go? Westerly?

Now please tell me, why are Rovers and Westerlys no longer in production?
 

Birdseye

Well-known member
Joined
9 Mar 2003
Messages
28,322
Location
s e wales
Visit site
" Now please tell me, why are Rovers and Westerlys no longer in production? " The answer is straight forward - we Brits are not prepared to support British industry in the way the French do (subsidies to Renault, Ben/Bav etc), the Germans do (subsidies to Hanse), the Italians do and even the Americans do (Harley anyone?). If a British company struggles - and what company doesnt struggle at some point - we pull the rug.

Westerly is a good example. They were solidly made boats, arguably as good as the Swedes at that time. But we always seem to assume, foreign is best. Or cheaper.
 

Chris_Robb

Well-known member
Joined
15 Jun 2001
Messages
8,060
Location
Haslemere/ Leros
Visit site
>Westerly is a good example. They were solidly made boats, arguably as good as the Swedes at that time. But we always seem to assume, foreign is best. Or cheaper<

The first Westerly committed suicide - it was a very profitable company - then decisions unrelated to boats - buying property - killed it in 6 months flat. If they had not made that stupid move then - they would be here today - and could be as large as Beneteau.
 

jasu74

New member
Joined
21 May 2004
Messages
29
Visit site
"we Brits are not prepared to support British industry in the way the French do (subsidies to Renault, Ben/Bav etc), the Germans do (subsidies to Hanse), the Italians do and even the Americans do (Harley anyone?)."

I'm sorry if I sound rude (but I am just curious), but how is Beneteau Group (listed in paris stock exchange) subsidised? or Bavaria Yachtbau (by the way it's german), or Hanse or even Harley Davidson (stock exchange listed). I thought that it is not wery easy to subsidies a privat company anymore in EU region. Not even if you are a ship building company (finnish masayards lost some deals to norvay because goverment could not subsidies the company. nowadays it is kvaerner-masayards /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif ).
 
G

Guest

Guest
Off whole thread poiint - but ... here goes !

How does a subsidy get given to private ?? Ask French farmers ?? Ask German Republic who pays for re-unification etc.

Basically so you cannot directly sub a private company .... ok - so give 'em tax breaks and rent-free locations etc. etc. There are a thousand ways to do it ......... and IMHO if a Brit govt. tried to help a Brit co. same way as some EU others do eg. France would be first to scream to EU commission .....

Anyway let's look at Rover .... sorry to original poster about this - but I didn't divert the thread .... Various companies wanted 4x4 technology that was off the shelf, wanted to remove direct competitor, wanted some slices and lose the rest .... witness Honda with Legend, CRV ..... then BMW with X5, X3 and also the look-alike models ..... BMW had a direct rival in Rover .... how do you remove a rival and grab the market - buy it out and then fold it - keeping the good bits ....

I firmly believe that BMW 'legally' stripped Rover to the core .... then discarded it. Funny thing is I am NOT a Rover fan ... but I am appalled at another Brit Household name falling by wayside .... Whats left ... Rolls / Bentley - German ..... boat industry wrecked ..... what's next ?>?

Can we get back to Bav and keels ... ??
 

sailorman

Well-known member
Joined
21 May 2003
Messages
78,873
Location
Here or thertemp ashore
Visit site
Re: Off whole thread poiint - but ... here goes !

[I firmly believe that BMW 'legally' stripped Rover to the core .... then discarded it. Funny thing is I am NOT a Rover fan ... but I am appalled at another Brit Household name falling by wayside .... Whats left ... Rolls / Bentley - German ..... boat industry wrecked ..... what's next ?>?
]
how about HMs government /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif
 

ParaHandy

Active member
Joined
18 Nov 2001
Messages
5,210
Visit site
Re: Off whole thread poiint - but ... here goes !

subsidy or no, the one indisputable measure of a cpy's eg Beneteau's manufacturing ability is the turnover per employee which (in 2001) was >£100,000 per head. That would rank it as a world class cpy particularly in a business which is not easy to automate ... jist a thocht ...
 
G

Guest

Guest
I don\'t argue Nett numbers ... I have my own co\'s etc / Barracuda keel

Ben or Jen took over the other as I remember .... for what ever reason ... they are still going strong .... good for them.

But subsidies in what ever form affect final balance sheet and are not normally known by likes of me or you ..... so income per employee may be 100K p/a ..... fantastic ... but do you have the full spreadsheet - not just the edited 'highlights' placed on public record ?

Sorry to be an a...e about this - but my public accounts are not same as sits in my account managers files .... NOT that I am dishonest - its just that not all items are singular declared or public. That's the system.

Now back to wayward keels ...

How many remember the original Barracuda losing its keel of Princess Shoals ?? In fact as I remember she did it more than once ..... what's happened to her now ??? Last I saw was she up for sale in Port Solent - but that was a few years ago ....
 
B

bob_tyler

Guest
Re: Barracuda keel

That was Bob Fisher's work. I think it became rather a habit of his, as did hitting the wreck off the Needles /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif

Barracuda was originally built for the "Howards Way" series, the Director of which, Gerry Glaister, passed away earlier this year at the ripe old age of 89.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Re: Barracuda keel

I think it was Howards Way took advantage of the design available to bring into the show .... I believe ... having been friendly with various Westerly people - living as I did close to Waterlooville ... Barracuda was not designed FOR Howards Way ... nor was the little 25ft'r that came out of Northshore either ....

But they gave a good story line for HW to develop ..... pity that it developed into a Fashion Clothes serial instead of keeping on the boats ... ok we had Sunseekers etc. but so few real boating scenes that it became a joke ...

Somewhere I have a picture of Barracuda 1 surfing on her way to the Scottish series .....

For those interested ........ a Model Airplane Club I belonged to had complaints from BBC about noise ... as we had a field site near Hamble that we used to fly at some weekends and evenings .... they said that our high-pitched engines were interfering with their sound recordings while shooting episodes of Howards Way ......
/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif
 

joja

New member
Joined
5 Jun 2005
Messages
3
Visit site
Re: Barracuda keel

Hi,
As for Your information I have seen capsized Bay 42 match in Croatia and the hull thickness araund keel area is 15mm and rest of the hull 10mm as far as I know it should be 18-20mm and rest of the hull 12mmand more, also the keel was suported by only one backing plate . ecc. There is clear manufacturer problem.Maybe the Germans are not so german any more.
 

joja

New member
Joined
5 Jun 2005
Messages
3
Visit site
Hi,
As for Your information I have seen capsized Bay 42 match in Croatia and the hull thickness araund keel area is 15mm and rest of the hull 10mm as far as I know it should be 18-20mm and rest of the hull 12mmand more, also the keel was suported by only one backing plate . ecc. There is clear manufacturer problem.Maybe the Germans are not so german any more. Is this maybe reason for IMCI to cancel EC certificate for all bavaria or else.There are reports from Norway ,Britan ecc. about the same problem and reports that bavaria has this problem on the prototipe too.Who is than responsible. Bavaria ,IMCI or maybe race organizer.Weather report is 22-27knots of wind and see 2-3 at that time. This is not so bad. Why is nobody trying to find the keel. Many quetistions and there we have Bavaria statement talking about the fishing net. /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif /forums/images/graemlins/shocked.gif
 

joja

New member
Joined
5 Jun 2005
Messages
3
Visit site
Re: Proprietors of Bavaria yachts CHECK your kiels !!!!!!!!!!

Dear sailers check the web site www.adriatic challenge.com and there You can see photos of Bavaria 42 match underwater.Very shocking.

Regards
 

Vara

Active member
Joined
20 Feb 2004
Messages
7,015
Location
Canterbury/Dover
Visit site
Re: Proprietors of Bavaria yachts CHECK your kiels !!!!!!!!!!

MORE DIRECT LINK Click on pictures Bavaria 42 match(1 down right hand side)

It would appear to my untutored eye that all of the boats pictured have at some time been severely grounded,what do the more learned panel think?
 
G

Guest

Guest
Re: Proprietors of Bavaria yachts CHECK your kiels !!!!!!!!!!

To my eye these look like the kind of superficial scrapes that you might get from going into a typical Mediterranean harbour and nuzzling against a rock close in to the harbour wall. They don't look like anything has hit a rock hard.

I hit a (uncharted!) rock last summer at 2 knots which was quite a hard bang - the damage to my keel was happily not great - it was localised to the point of impact, but it definitely looked like something had HIT the keel ie. a localised chip 2 or 3 cm wide out of the gelcoat, with fracturing. The impact did not touch the surrounding anti-fouling at all (which is soft (Micron Optima) and wipes off at the slightest touch). What I see in these pictures of the bottoms of the keels is something very different: the keel rather scraping along something - normal wear and tear rather than impact damage.

The images of the cracking around the keel roots are extraordinary!

Personally in any case I would regard the occasional 'grounding' as part of the normal wear and tear of sailing, and would not expect the keel to drop off! Hitting a rock at 5 or 6 knots might be expected to cause some strain, but these pics do not IMHO look like anything like that has happened.
 
G

Guest

Guest
The photo gallery ..... interesting and open to debate.

Just looking at the photos and not actually being at the boats to check a few other points / indicators ---- the comment here is subject to opinion based on the photos only.

All seem to show signs of movement of the keels splitting the coating .... generally appeared to have moved aft .... looking at the coating cracks ... the shape and style are similar edges etc. why ? Were the keels flexing at all during use ? Are the mountings sufficiently flexible to allow the keels to move ? Are the keel-bolts insufficiently tightened up ? Are the keel-bolts passing through a sika-flex or similar impact absorbing fitting ?

One or two keels do show signs of objects striking them - but that would be expected from debris / items in water not necessarily rocks etc. But generally they are scraped or grazed.

Another interesting point is the angle of sail-drive in some cases where it appears not to be square to hull .....

For such a craft - I am extremely concerned about the keel plates and apparently lack of serious area distribution .... 42ft race boat takes a hard life and strain on its keels / mast etc. In comparison with such as a Ridas etc. -which is a serious race boat with a 'frame' to support the keel ... this small plate affair is not IMHO supportive enough ....

Interestingly - there does not seem to be any photo with a serious 'strike' .... but then again I have seen a keel after hitting an obstruction at estimated 7 kts .... all it had apart from its displacement 1 deg aft angle and 1/2 degree to starboard was a chip out of the lead leading edge about 2-3cms across and about 1cm deep.

Finally having seen a Bav lifted from shore stands and keel actually having been displaced by the boats weight .... this showed small hair cracks in the anti-foul around the keel joint .... where keel flexed in its mount. BUT this is not to say we have same here ...

Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm interesting and hopefully all will be revealed at some time ....
 

tcm

...
Joined
11 Jan 2002
Messages
23,958
Location
Caribbean at the moment
Visit site
\"plus a bit on the safe side\"

um, it can't be that woolly. There should be a standard and if bav have got lloyds sticker innem - they meet those standards, no?

Purely on a personal basis, looking at the pix, it seems a bit crummy with just a little backing plate here and there - but there again modern car bumpers are made of plastic and foam, not big lumps of steel as in days gone by. I suppose the actual size of the backing plate must surely be critical and yep, i'd like one that was much bigger please, and of course it COULD be made stronger, as i spose any boat cd be made stronger, really.

Courtcasewise - i wd imagine bav have done enuf, unless some glaring issue is found whereby summink isnt to promised spec. Actual strengthwise, ralph nader might spring to mind. It's not hard to find boat bits that are made poxily. Note than an engineer who was really fab would probably build cars and get paid a lot more.
 
Top