geem
Well-known member
Not in so many words but chalk n cheese springs to mindDid anybody suggest that it was?
Not in so many words but chalk n cheese springs to mindDid anybody suggest that it was?
You see, You are making it all up. You will be applying for a job with the Daily Mail next.Not in so many words but chalk n cheese springs to mind
Na, jobs are over rated. Been retired for the last 8 yearsYou see, You are making it all up. You will be applying for a job with the Daily Mail next.
So you are to blame for the government's complaint about the loss of mature labour force not working.Na, jobs are over rated. Been retired for the last 8 years
I suppose I should accept some blame as well, although I did work until I was seventy, but I felt the it time for the younger staff to take over, this combined with the rapid onslaught of digital technology in my field of expertise photo-chemical imaging it seemed a good time to go sailing instead.So you are to blame for the government's complaint about the loss of mature labour force not working.
I went on to 72 (but only in the winter months) I was asked to go back last year for 4 weeks (75) to review some past projects, but the wife put her foot down, so that was the end of it. But I do still keep my professional qualifications going- Just in case.I suppose I should accept some blame as well, although I did work until I was seventy, but I felt the it time for the younger staff to take over, this combined with the rapid onslaught of digital technology in my field of expertise photo-chemical imaging it seemed a good time to go sailing instead.
yawnSo you are to blame for the government's complaint about the loss of mature labour force
Does anyone know of any research or figures (or even anecdotal experience) on the amount of extra drive added by the overlapping section of a big genoa? In other words, the last 40% of a 140% sale or whatever.
As I understand it, the masthead / huge Genoa rig emerged from rating rules that measured the fore triangle not the foresail area, so that the overlap was in effect 'free' in rating terms; intuitively I wouldn't expect it to add drive in proportion to its area, given that it's at the back end of the curve of the sail so it runs almost parallel to the centreline.
I suppose I'm wondering, is it possible to quantify the loss of power from using a 100% foresail on a masthead rig that could take a 140%?
Gaffers used to run something in between a code 0 and an asymmetric. A blooper.
I gave up at 51Bloody hell you guys, we gave up that work malarkey at 55, my wife was 51 when she retired. I cannot imagine working at a job now. Far too busy with the house(huge refurbishment) and sailing.
To quote a well known seaside character. ‘That’s the way to do it!’I gave up at 51
To quote a well known seaside character. ‘That’s the way to do it!’
Agreed, The aim is active years in retirement, age is just a number. My wife retired early as she has rheumatoid arthritis.But not everyone who would like to can retire early. Maybe less so going forward. The 50 and 55 year old retirees will be statistical outliers.
For the majority of us, retiring older, what is far more important than early retirement for enjoyment of our sailing, is health and fitness. It is never too late to improve health and fitness through lifestyle choices. The human body responds favourably to good health and fitness choices at any age.