Tell me where the other 2 boxes are , I get so many enquiries for parts and boxes my spares are almost run out from the boxes beyond resurrection I’ve kept over the years .After a few years lurking unused in a garage ( quite common in the effette South, we dont keep coal in the bath either ) the little baby gearbox made from cast iron and other non ferrous materials , the word 'ferrous' comes from the Latin word 'ferrum,' which means 'iron, was sold to a buyer who popped over from Germany to collect , the handover took place in lonely deserted wind swept car park at Dover Docks.
The transfer of a rather heavy box from the back of an Audi to a Mercedes went unobserved by the security camera and/or it was to cold for them the come outside, we both bought some henchmen along for security purposes due to the value of the transaction.
Between OGs appalling German and the buyers little group we mustered enough understanding to complete the exchange and to explain where the nearest chip shop was.
Bring English , one is very reluctant to discuss matters of personal finance but can say the box was sold for an amount sufficient to fill a 1000L fuel tank to be found on the perfectly average type of vessel commonly found down here in the prosperous South.
Am aware of the location of two other "spare" gearboxes and of a third which could possibly be resurrected, howeve,r am sworn to silence unless being greeted with a very special handshake.
Some of this account may be entirely fictional or may have elements of truth.
A Merry Winterval to All.Even to those in the wastelands beyond the M25.
Nope. The Rodman 41 was originally a shaft drive boat. They did indeed develop a new hull to go with the IPS installations, but the boat and the layout had been in production as a shaft drive boat for some years, so your wide ranging survey of one single boat to 'prove' that IPS is no more space efficient than shafts is somewhat flawed I'm afraid. It's not going to be if the boat was originally shaft drive in the first place, is it?Can only comment regards the Rodman 41, one of the very first builders to design a hull specifically to take advantage of all those earth shattering revolutionary benefits of IPS.
Rodman 41. Shaft or IPS. Same length of boat with identical interior layout . Both feature that 3rd cabin in exactly the same location within the hull.Nope. The Rodman 41 was originally a shaft drive boat. They did indeed develop a new hull to go with the IPS installations, but the boat and the layout had been in production as a shaft drive boat for some years, so your wide ranging survey of one single boat to 'prove' that IPS is no more space efficient than shafts is somewhat flawed I'm afraid. It's not going to be if the boat was originally shaft drive in the first place, is it?
Your claims about outdrives being no more efficient than shafts unless at WOT are equally wide of the mark.
To save time, lets all agree that the best (and only) boat for anyone to buy has to be one with shaft drives. The engines must be diesel and the boat itself must be a flybridge. Anything other than that will melt, catch fire, sink, explode, break down, cost a fortune, cause premature baldness and have too much canvas and too many poppers for anyone to use more than once. The above is true irrespective of where the boat will be kept, what use the boat will be put to, what budget the purchaser has and last but not least, what boats are on the market when and where the buyer is looking.Rodman 41. Shaft or IPS. Same length of boat with identical interior layout . Both feature that 3rd cabin in exactly the same location within the hull.
The lazerette and engine compartment have just swapped places.
Outdrive economy over shafts ?
Princess 33 2 x 125hp outdrives
Transocean 37 (Broom 37 hull ) 2 x 130 Hp Shaft
Fuel logs indicate more or less same fuel consumption from both boats, around 1000 hours on each boat
Yes exactly!! So your point 'I've been on one IPS boat and it was no bigger in terms of interior volume than a shaft drive boat' is indeed correct, but also irrelevant. Since that boat started life as a shaft drive boat the interior volume IS of a shaft drive boat, that didn't change when they starting fitting IPS drives.Rodman 41. Shaft or IPS. Same length of boat with identical interior layout . Both feature that 3rd cabin in exactly the same location within the hull.
The lazerette and engine compartment have just swapped places.
Outdrive economy over shafts ?
Princess 33 2 x 125hp outdrives
Transocean 37 (Broom 37 hull ) 2 x 130 Hp Shaft
Fuel logs indicate more or less same fuel consumption from both boats, around 1000 hours on each boat
Exactly so!To save time, lets all agree that the best (and only) boat for anyone to buy has to be one with shaft drives. The engines must be diesel and the boat itself must be a flybridge. Anything other than that will melt, catch fire, sink, explode, break down, cost a fortune, cause premature baldness and have too much canvas and too many poppers for anyone to use more than once. The above is true irrespective of where the boat will be kept, what use the boat will be put to, what budget the purchaser has and last but not least, what boats are on the market when and where the buyer is looking.
I'll ask the mods to make this a sticky.
Yes exactly!! So your point 'I've been on one IPS boat and it was no bigger in terms of interior volume than a shaft drive boat' is indeed correct, but also irrelevant. Since that boat started life as a shaft drive boat the interior volume IS of a shaft drive boat, that didn't change when they starting fitting IPS drives.
Princess 33 with a pair of 125hp outdrives will obviously be poor on fuel as it is woefully underpowered as a planing boat. But (surely!) you know that... Try comparing apples with Apples.
33 and 37 nearly identical?Planing boats ?
Both semi displacement hulls around 16/17 knots max on both.
Both around same length and weight and vintage
Both with 6 cylinder similar HP engines .
One with outdrives and one with shafts.
Similar hours run and virtually identical fuel consumption.
Apples with Apples ?
Weight of the underpowered Princess 33 5500 kilos with total of 250 hp
Weight of the Broom 37 . 8000 kilos with total of 260 hp
Similar hours run and virtually identical fuel consumption......QED.![]()