How Safe are Windows in the Hull

Concerto

Well-known member
Joined
16 Jul 2014
Messages
6,152
Location
Chatham Maritime Marina
Visit site
Having read the thread and links, I have some further comments to make.

I am not against hull windows. What I see as the problem, is relying on bonding alone. In my opinion mechanical fixings should be used in conjunction with bonding. The material of the windows is not a problem and is strong enough.

Comments about aircraft windows being bonded only, seems to be a false claim as in post #17 of this link https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/655290-titan-a321-loses-windows.html shows a photograph that the windows are mechanically fixed and they are multi layered, and in the incident discussed talked about the outer layers of 3 windows being lost.

Car windscreens have been bonded for some considerable number of decades, but can still fail. My own car started a leak at the top of the windscreen at about 6 years old and it had never been in any accident. Fortunately for me the glass cracked a few months later after a large stone hit the screen. Cars do flex and in my case the bonded windscreen failed due to this.

The link to Sirus yachts and their windows was interesting to read. How strong are the hull windows on a boat? They predict their yachts should last 100 to 120 years, yet they also comment that the windows may require removal and refitting from time to time. They do not mention what time scale this should be. Should it be every half century or every decade, so the comment was not that helpful for potential owners. They certainly do not guarantee the windows for the life of the yacht.

Every hull that has hull windows should be reinforced in the recess to ensure no flexing should occur. However the hull can be subjected to many forces that can cause flexing. The windows are fitted before any rig is fitted and tensioned. Heavy seas can subject them to weighty loadings. Berthing alongside a marina pontoon or wall in rought conditions can apply repeated loadings that will cause localised loadings. A hard grounding like hitting a rock can flex the hull. Even once lifted out of the water a hull will change shape as it is no longer supported in the same way when resting on its keel and chocks. All of these situations will cause some flexing of the hull, and could start the breakdown of the bonding. Most of these problems I have experienced on different boats.
 

Baggywrinkle

Well-known member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
10,001
Location
Ammersee, Bavaria / Adriatic & Free to roam Europe
Visit site
Every fixing method for dissimilar materials has pros and cons.

Metal frames or mechanical fixings create localised stress points where bolts are fixed, these can cause localised fractures, they can also corrode and sieze. They are more complex to seal, and for anyone who has removed and resealed this type of window, they are more time consuming to remove, properly clean, and re-seal than adhesive only.

Adhesive only must create a flexible bond to allow both materials to flex or move within their design parameters but the nature of adhesives is that they degrade and lose their elasticity over time, resulting in eventual failure. If the adhesive layer is too thin, then early failure is assured.

My personal take on this is that as soon as signs of crazing or leaks appear, then remove and replace or re-seal with a modern adhesive specified for the job.

The bigger problem with modern windows in general are the ones that have complex shapes that are difficult to reproduce without the original moulds. When they start to craze or crack, and the manufacturers replacement parts are no longer available, then the boat owner really has a problem. Anything without a complex shape can be reproduced by most replacement window supply companies.
 

Mister E

Well-known member
Joined
16 Nov 2015
Messages
4,459
Location
here
Visit site
The thing to be learnt from the program is to inspect this type of window attachment, it is not a fit and forget item.
Much the same as on any boat.
 

ylop

Well-known member
Joined
10 Oct 2016
Messages
2,386
Visit site
The thing to be learnt from the program is to inspect this type of window attachment, it is not a fit and forget item.
Much the same as on any boat.
The thing to be learnt from the program is that if you have a crisis and call mayday - don’t agree to the footage being used on tv as some smart arse will be along to question every aspect of your story!
 

Baggywrinkle

Well-known member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
10,001
Location
Ammersee, Bavaria / Adriatic & Free to roam Europe
Visit site
Yacht designers should consult YBW before considering hull windows. Who would have thought that hulls flex, penetrations need reinforcing and adhesives deteriorate. Bread and butter for the MAB owner.
Nooooooo!!!! I really hope yacht designers don't consult YBW forums.

... if they did listen to this forum, we'd have dingy little floating caves with lots of dark wood and little daylight, cramped cockpits, and no swim platforms - and probably a return to canoe sterns or something equally as awkward to travese. There would be narrow berths with lee-cloths and an abundance of handholds to prevent doddering octogenarians from smacking their heads off the narrow coach-roofs. There wouldn't be enough room for modern electronics at the helm or the chart table as we all prefer paper charts and pencils ... none of this modern elecktrickery that will fail at the drop of a hat. Bowthrusters are for pussies as anyone who can handle a boat properly doesn't need one, and we'd be back to one wheel, or maybe a tiller because no-one needs wheels really. There would be no room for a decent amount of unshaded solar, and boats would be built much heavier to go through waves rather than over them - making for a very wet ride. Roller furling mains would also be out.

.... did I forget anything?
 

RivalRedwing

Well-known member
Joined
9 Nov 2004
Messages
3,641
Location
Rochester, UK, boat in SYH
Visit site
This has the makings of an issue similar to that of (brass) seacocks which complied with the relevant ISO standard for boat manufacture, but that in turn only specified a service life of 7 years (as I recall), even some top end builders were highlighted as using it as a vehicle for cost saving.... Quite a bit about that one in YM a few years ago.
 

Mister E

Well-known member
Joined
16 Nov 2015
Messages
4,459
Location
here
Visit site
The thing to be learnt from the program is that if you have a crisis and call mayday - don’t agree to the footage being used on tv as some smart arse will be along to question every aspect of your story!
Fortunately for us they did and hopefully the sensible people will take note and check.
As for the rest they are just flapping their chops.
 

lustyd

Well-known member
Joined
27 Jul 2010
Messages
12,311
Visit site
Fortunately for us they did and hopefully the sensible people will take note and check.
As for the rest they are just flapping their chops.
The "sensible people" didn't need a video to know they had to check things that wear on boats. Others will eventually star in their own video because some widget or other wasn't explicitly pointed out to them as needing maintenance.
 

lustyd

Well-known member
Joined
27 Jul 2010
Messages
12,311
Visit site
I forgot the perfect people who never make a mistake.
Silly me
We all make mistakes, and we're all a bit more lazy than we like to admit. Being surprised that adhesive sealant degrades over decades is very different. My point was that if that's a surprise to anyone then what else might they be overlooking that's just as obvious? individually calling out items for inspection isn't sustainable and as a boat owner it's better to learn general competence.
 

Supertramp

Well-known member
Joined
18 Jul 2020
Messages
1,013
Location
Halifax
Visit site
We all make mistakes, and we're all a bit more lazy than we like to admit. Being surprised that adhesive sealant degrades over decades is very different. My point was that if that's a surprise to anyone then what else might they be overlooking that's just as obvious? individually calling out items for inspection isn't sustainable and as a boat owner it's better to learn general competence.
Agree with this and the rigorous owner needs to check and make judgements. I don't see hull windows being very different from perspex glazed hatches which I'm sure most of us replace every 20 years (?).

The real question is the designer's choice of size and location in areas where failure is likely to cause significant water ingress. I accept they are probably well made and will last many decades.

Should all boats should be capable of use in all weather and conditions? When do you decide its too rough to pound on? Boat design (and age) should factor in the skipper's judgement.
 

boomerangben

Well-known member
Joined
24 Jul 2003
Messages
1,209
Location
Isle of Lewis
Visit site
I think those of us taught to sail and keep a boat by parents/friends etc will know a bit about what it takes to maintain a boat. But if we are truthful, how good are we at preventive maintenance. How many reseal a window BEFORE it or one of its colleagues starts leaking? And how many would be able to look at the adhesive/sealant on one of these windows and say, that won’t last next season, or rather there’s a greater than xx% chance that the window will fail next season? And then how many owners will think to even check?
 

Laser310

Well-known member
Joined
15 Sep 2014
Messages
1,344
Visit site
I had a look at a Salona 41 a few years ago, I think the same model as had the failure: twin helms and fairly contemporary.

I liked the boat, and though that the build quality was pretty good - far better than the nearly identical Dehler I saw earlier in the day.

I liked the galvanized keel grid just like those on many X-Yachts. Finish level everywhere was also pretty good.

From the article linked in the beginning of the thread, it sounds like the windows are glued on from the inside; they describe the window popping into the forepeak. I'd like to see a discussion of the pro's and con's of inside vs outside by a builder or NA, but outside seems better to me.

In any case, this has been educational; I've sailed quite a bit on various boats with windows that go underwater when the boat is heeled - Oysters, X-yachts etc., and while at first I thought it was a bit sketchy, I long ago got to the point where I don't give them a thought.

Also, I'm boat shopping. Most of the boats I am thinking about have these windows. There are hardly any boats built in the last say 15 years without them. I guess I should ask if the windows have been re-bedded.., but i'm sure the answer will always be; no. I've never seen it in a list of items addressed during a refit.
 

justanothersailboat

Well-known member
Joined
2 Aug 2021
Messages
487
Visit site
To be fair Baggywrinkle, that would be a lovely boat if properly looked after :-(

Boomerangben... anyone who can know that sealant/adhesive that they can't see is about to fail isn't just great at boat maintenance. They're also psychic. I would be very interested to know their lottery number picks.
 
Top