tcm
...
However, he does fill the yawning gap where Gordon Brown was in the list of people you would least like to meet in a pub.
Harsh, but fair...
However, he does fill the yawning gap where Gordon Brown was in the list of people you would least like to meet in a pub.
why would anyone sail across the channel without at least a SSR.
The more people are aware of the law and can stand up to someone trying to con them, the less twisted people will try their tricks on british yachties.
And then there are the stories of flares
Jesus, as one urban myth dies another raises its ugly head.
![]()
Originally Posted by Tranona
However, he does fill the yawning gap where Gordon Brown was in the list of people you would least like to meet in a pub.
What nonsense, not fair at all. He is entertaining and literate. Who else could keep this thread bouncing along in such an obsessive way, it is my morning's delight to read the inevitable next set of postings. You lot too seem to be caught up in it all so if you feel like that just don't click on this thread.Harsh, but fair...
I was fined FF 100 in Carteret on Friday July 19 1991, reduced to an administrative charge of FF10, when I produced the SSR at the Douaniers' 35' later.
As I'm not as obsessional as Toad, the receipt has long since gone into the wastebasket.
One has to admire anyone so entrenched in his own misbegotten opinion as to be able to
ignore others' commonplace experiences.
I'll find you the original French legislation which you can download and translate at your leisure.
I was fined FF 100 in Carteret on Friday July 19 1991, reduced to an administrative charge of FF10, when I produced the SSR at the Douaniers' 35' later.
As I'm not as obsessional as Toad, the receipt has long since gone into the wastebasket.
One has to admire anyone so entrenched in his own misbegotten opinion as to be able to ignore others' commonplace experiences.
Answers to your questions, Toad:-My spider sense is telling me there's no point in asking you what offence resulted in this £9 fine with £1 admin charge.
Are Cherbourg Police entrenched in their own misbegotten opinion as well? (Incidentally, I'm totally open minded. If you post verifiable facts I'll check them.)
Is it really a case of me ignoring them or is it more the case that not one contains the slightest detail that would allow anyone to find out any information whatsoever about this offence? These "commonplace experiences" haven't lead you to any tangible information about this offence, why should they have lead me to anything?
Edit:
Hang on. I thought I recognized the name. A few days ago you made this offer:
Why are you accusing me of ignoring "commonplace experiences" when you yourself are ignoring the actual legislation which would clear this up once and for all?
Many thanks for the offer - the incident occurred in the early days of my travels away from the Channel Islands and the Norman coast.Hi Charles Reed,
next time you have a problem like this (or any other reason) in Carteret, call me... I live five minutes away from the Harbour and I will be glad to help... €1,35 is too much to pay to a "joker" officer. I know that nowadays it is the price to pay for a coffe at "La Cale a Kiki" on the quay but it is a question of principle. Fair winds.
PS, anybody on this forum who has a translation problem and cruising the Cotentin peninsula is welcome to get in touch, I will be glad to help as I spend most of my time in France those days. Regards, Al
charles_reed said:I'll find you the original French legislation which you can download and translate at your leisure.
I did try to show my papers in Cherbourg but they weren't interested at all, so didn't bother after that. In some places where there was a tourist tax they were interested in how many of us there were, but otherwise no interest. We were boarded in Port Medoc and found the officers to be polite freindly and not without a sense of humour. They checked everything apart from the dog passport.It has been quite an interesting thread ....
Conclusion I have come to is that whilst it (on balance of probability) isn't a legal requirement for a british flagged vessel to carry or produce original registration papers to the French whilst in their waters, it is a lot easier to produce them and not try to argue your way out of a fine.
Each of my visits to a French port has resulted in the production of my passport and SSR to the marina office - even then they weren't that bothered - I have yet to have the privilige of a boarding ... but when it does happen, my papers are in order and they will be welcomed aboard with a smile.
It would be interesting, because it would ultimately end up going to court -- which would, at least determine whether the law actually exists. But that does seem a rather self-defeating way of finding out whether the law exists -- I don't suppose you would suggest killing someone to find out whether there is a law against killing people!I would enjoy watching you trying to argue the case with a Douanes officer, in the manner you've adopted on this thread. Your fate would be rapid and, probably, a salutary experience for you.
no-one has yet produced any actual legislation to support their argument. Paraphrases, yes. General advice, yes. But no actual law.
So far, despite lots of people insisting that it does, and some saying how easy it is to find it, no-one has yet produced any actual legislation to support their argument. Paraphrases, yes. General advice, yes. But no actual law.