mjcoon
Well-known member
The subject of the 1st of a 2 part series that is tonight at 21:00 -22:00 on Channel 5. Part 2 is tomorrow night. Probably mostly about the passengers rather than about the boat handling...
Having chartered a boat in the bay of Naples one August, and witnessed the denizens of that fine city out and about in their mobos, it came as no surprise to me to discover that the Captain of the Costa Concordia was a Neapolitan…….The subject of the 1st of a 2 part series that is tonight at 21:00 -22:00 on Channel 5. Part 2 is tomorrow night. Probably mostly about the passengers rather than about the boat handling...
Not doing a flyby close to shore to impress your mistress on the bridge would have significantly decreased the number of casualties.As far as I can recall the AIS track of the incident showed the vessel approach the shore very closely then head out to deeper water before returning to shore before beaching. This suggests to me that someone on the bridge made a good decision.
Sinking in deeper water would have greatly increased the number of casualties.
When a well equipped ship hits well-charted rocks in good conditions, there are really only two possible explanations, mechanical failure (but why were you that close unless entering or leaving harbour?) or a criminal level of negligence.Sheer incompetence on the bridge.
As far as I can recall the AIS track of the incident showed the vessel approach the shore very closely then head out to deeper water before returning to shore before beaching. This suggests to me that someone on the bridge made a good decision.
Sinking in deeper water would have greatly increased the number of casualties.
The chief engineer coming out of the engine room with his clothes soaked from his neck down would indicate they lost motive power, the slow drift to the shore was the wind
Talk about making a very sharp analysis in great detail. Not.Stetttino is maggot, pure and simple. A cowardly, unprofessional maggot.
I no longer wonder whether all those jokes about Italian tanks having 4 reverse gears were so silly after all.
Since you are now shifting the debate to semantic, you also said (twice) that he's a maggot.All I said was that he is an unprofessional and a shameful coward.
Is up to me? Are you for real? Should I quote (again!) your own previous post?Any accusations you wish to scatter elsewhere - be they on the Company, Southampton (?), bureaucrats in general, PR officers or even the President and population of Italy is up to you - some of it may even be valid, but none of that is actually relevant as a response to what I wrote.