t21
Well-Known Member
.
At a conservative estimate, 'letting it rip' and 'taking it on the chin' would have resulted in half a million deaths in the UK.
This is more than lost their lives in the whole of WW2
If you think it is fine then I hope you are prepared to take one for the team.
- W
Doesn’t sound a conservative estimate? And you’ve gone all personal again in a vain attempt to press your (very flawed) point.
Uk Deaths in WW2 were of course highest amongst the young, under 30’s, the survival-of-the-species critical group as they reproduce. This is not the group that suffers in a flu epidemic.
Even on the Diamond Princess cruise ship, the youngest victim was aged 36.
Grim but true, an epidemic that attacks the “at risk anyway” would positively help the rest of the population. Lower property costs, lower healthcare bills, earlier inheritance!
I believe that they’ll back-peddle on this, and maybe sooner than any two weeks. US families are often quoted as being two pay checks from living on the streets. Were the elderly and infirm gonna vote anyway? Or maybe they were gonna do as you’re doing - cluttering up the Internet with yet more badly-thought-out scaremongering.