Bowman 48 keel problem

Looking at the location of the limber holes I suspect the timber has suffered form moisture entry. But it couls also be that the timber used had a high oil content and the timber fibreglass has de laminated from the timber, not an uncommon failure.

Builders avoid the use of timber these days and use foam as a shape former only and apply a lot more glass, this results on more strength and reliability with less height, however it ia also more expensive.

You could drill some 6 mm holes and check the condition of the timber by checking the material that is driven out for moisture and condition, also take note of the pressure on the drill and any variation in speed of depth that might indicate softer areas.

If no problems, fill the holes with thickened epoxy resin.

You should be able to remove them one at a time and replace them with smaller fillers and more glass, eliminating any replete or this problem.

If you decide to replace them, use short sections of tube like conduit to form your limber holes and reduce the chanses of moisture contamination in the future.

I hope this helps.

Let us know what your findings are.

Avagoodweekend......

.
 
Last edited:
I have a Bowman 48 1993. In 2008 prior to crossing the atlantic I found a crack on the bottom of the forward partition just behind the mast. There were no others. In 2009 in Antigua I found all the floors over the keel had developed cracks where they join the hull. A photo is attached of one but all have.The actual keelbolts are all right as far as can be seen.In a seaway I can feel slight opening and closing of the crracks. Why has this happened ? is it serious ? . I have presumed it relates to sailing in waves although there was a minor bump before we left.

It looks like the "Matrix" strengthening the hull where the keel is attached has become un-bonded from the hull.
you need to get a surveyor urgently & get haul-out
 
Thanks. I have a surveyor and the boat is now out the water in Antigua but not much wiser. There is no obvious cracking on the outside. It is clear that the frames are seperating from the hull and at the moment we are grinding them back and reglassing. Re the wood do you think there is wood under the keel bolt nuts or do you mean the wood that the frames are made of. The question is whether more needs done and how one would know. Re the keel matrix seperating there is no obvious cracking along the sides - only where the frames are
Malc

the hull above the keel will almost certainly be 100% GRP.
was the cracking more apparent when she was hanging in the slings prior to standing her on the keel & with no support by the water.
ie all the keel weight pulling / hanging against the matrix
 
What does your surveyor say?

Seems that the floors are failing by the grp bond with the hull failing. The wood inside may be rotten from water ingress but you wont know until you grind off the glass.

If you can feel movement then the hull is flexing and the floors are there to stop the flexing so they need to be rebuilt. Only a qualified person on the spot can determine how much needs to be done and I guess oldsaltz suggestion of removing the wooden floors completely and replacing with foam cored ones with proper limber holes is a good long term solution, but I guess it depends very much on the depth of your pockets and how permanent you want the solution to be.
 
The cracks definitely became less when we sat the boat on the keel - no doubt and the rigging tensed up I think - keel stepped mast.
Surveyor advised basically grinding off glass on each side of frame where cracked , removing the keel bolt nutts and adding glass or rather a matt stuff and resin 3 layers over whole flat bit bolts go through and running up the sides of the frames and sides of boat. This is ongoing but still I dont really understand what has happened or really whether this is enough or not.
Malc

any re-glassing need to be done with epoxy as polyester resin doesnt stick well to old post cured GRP
 
So why not be truthfull

Yes it is fixed - or we have papered over the cracks depending on what one feels is wrong. Will of course go for short voyage first but essentially next voyage is about 3,500 miles and very keen not to find out a further problem after first 1500 !. Would be very interested if any other similar boats had developed the same problem and what they did about it.
And how it worked!
Malc

to start with instead of "Drip Feeding" Clues
Toungethingy.gif
 
As you say, keel problems are not unknown, nor are failures of bonds of strengthening ribs such as the floors in your boat. Chuck Paine will have done his sums when he specified the layups, but there is no guarantee that either they were followed or that the quality of the original moulding was of the standard you would expect. It is only after time that you discover that many of the well established methods of the past have problems.

Only today I was discussing with the owner the rudder of a very well respected ocean going yacht of similar pedigree to yours. He had built a new rudder himself after the original failed. His description of how the original was built made my hair stand on end. Mild steel tangs on stainless stock was the least of the problem - mild steel bolts with nuts on set in resin to hold the two halves together before the foam was injected. Unsurprisingly after a few years rust spots appeared and the two halves split!

BTW agree it is unlikely to be grounding unless the boat was dropped onto its keel. Normally damage on grounding is hitting rock with the forward part of the keel. Damage is usually cracks at the front where the keel is in tension and a depression at the rear from compression. The fact that all the floors have damage suggest they were either not adequately bonded or are of inadequate scantlings to take the loads.
 
Think you are taking the sensible approach. You can only deal with what you have. My only reservation might be if you beef up the floors you might create stress points, but running the additional laminations over the hull should avoid that.

Hope it all goes well.
 
The first crack was certainly at the forward partition between the saloon and forecabin behind the mast step .At that time there were no cracks in any of the other floors but at some time thereafter over a period of 10 months atlantic sailing they developed but not sure when as there are tanks between the floors and it wasnt till the back one developed that we could see it and then found the rest when we removed the tanks. In that 6 months really can only attribute to sailing in big seas as no groundings but as the first crack was already there it is an extension of a problem that had already started.
The big question is whether now we have attached the floors back that solves the problem or whether there is a bigger problem with the whole keel.
Externally the yacht is antifouled and I intend to blast that off and look carefully for cracks externally in the gel goat at the top of the fibreglass keel former where it flanges out to the hull but other than doing that dont know what else can do.
Will also see what happens when relaunch and will bounce it around a bit to see if the cracks return. I have looked carefully externally at the back of the keel and see no problem but cant see the back internally clearly as there is a deep sump - nothing obvious though. The front of the keel at the root had been superficially repaired before by someone - I ground the repair out but no evidence of deeper damage and have just reglassed it over.
I think I think that the floors have just not been well attached in the first place and that we have cured it but not quite certain particularly as this has developed 15yrs after built but it is difficult to know what else to do.
Malc

If you have simply re glassed the area between the timbers and the hull without checking the internal condition of the timber you have possibly wasted a lot of time and money.

Drilling a few holes to check as posted above will be simple and tiake little time or effort.

The fact that the cracks open and close depending on the weight of the keel is a very good indication that the beams are not doing their job.

You must establish the reason for this, adding a bit more glass is not the answer, if the timbers are rotting they will continue to rot making things worse.

You must find and fix the cause of the problem before going back or it might be your last voyage. It's your decision, I know I would not be happy till had found and fixed the fault.

Good luck.
 
I had this problem on my Hummingbird when I bought her and on the advice of a Surveyor and great advice from Oldsaltoz sorted the problem by cutting out the saloon sole, completly removing the old rotton cross floors, cleaning the whole area of hull down to bare grp, adding several layers of 600grm biaxial cloth with epoxy, making new 35mm thick cross floors and completly encasing them in with the same cloth, woven roven and epoxy.
A long drawn out, dirty backing job, but one that was very successful and worth it.
Apic of some of the new floors in place, the green is dye from a marker pen used to mark the cloth for cutting.
The mast compression post was also removed and as OZ says the drain tubes in each cross floor was epoxied in to prevent water soaking into the ply.
This repair left the hull very rigid and strong.
Incidently you are not likely to find any cracks on the hull itself as it will flex a lot before cracking until the point of sudden failure.
I increased the bilge stub thickness by aprox 15mm feathering out towards the sides of the hull.
C_W

Img_0584-1.jpg

Img_0458450x600.jpg

Img_0382.jpg

IMG_0552-1.jpg
 
Last edited:
That looks a really good sound job Clyde Wanderer. I bet that puts a lot of keel reinforcement jobs to shame! I hope Malcom3 ponders this and the fact that you have done this on a 30 footer with a 3 ton keel? No idea what the keel weighs on a bowman 48!
 
Malc3 I think your taking a bit of a risk there, especially if your next cruise is 3.5k miles.
Seems to me that your repairs, all be it with good intention, are a short term repair job. A cover up rather than pay out the expense of a proper repair ?
I dont see how you could have confidence and sleep in peace a thousand miles from land in the knowledge your keel could fail.

One thought occurred to me............have you considered having it x-rayed.......might be expensive but could be worth it. I know its possible as my boats previous owner has it done having made alterations to the keel.
Might not be possible where you are but just a thought.

Good luck.
 
Thanks for replys . Have drilled one hole and it seemed OK will do a couple more but wood appears sound. Applied 3 x FIB-948 24oz fiberglass woven roving with West system epoxy in centre line overlapping 6” outward and over to each application end and throughout bilges and around studs. Also additional strengthening of 3x overlapping
3/4oz e-glass biaxial with west system epoxy to corners, facings, and longitudinal cross beam to hull bond. Certainly the floors are closer on Clyde Wanderer and as you say this keel is heavier. Have attatched photos of what is being done currently. Clyde wanderer when you say you increased the bilge stub was that done on the inside or outside?
 
That looks a really good sound job Clyde Wanderer. I bet that puts a lot of keel reinforcement jobs to shame! I hope Malcom3 ponders this and the fact that you have done this on a 30 footer with a 3 ton keel? No idea what the keel weighs on a bowman 48!

Actually the keel weighs 3600lbs.
 
Thanks for replys . Have drilled one hole and it seemed OK will do a couple more but wood appears sound. Applied 3 x FIB-948 24oz fiberglass woven roving with West system epoxy in centre line overlapping 6” outward and over to each application end and throughout bilges and around studs. Also additional strengthening of 3x overlapping
3/4oz e-glass biaxial with west system epoxy to corners, facings, and longitudinal cross beam to hull bond. Certainly the floors are closer on Clyde Wanderer and as you say this keel is heavier. Have attatched photos of what is being done currently. Clyde wanderer when you say you increased the bilge stub was that done on the inside or outside?

It seems to me that there are not enough floors.I would have fitted extra floors between the keelbolts .On my Fulmar I fitted an extra floor between the ones already there.The lay up on keel stubs is usually quite substantial and they are inherently stiff because of their shape but making them stronger is always a good thing.
 
Thanks for replys . Have drilled one hole and it seemed OK will do a couple more but wood appears sound. Applied 3 x FIB-948 24oz fiberglass woven roving with West system epoxy in centre line overlapping 6” outward and over to each application end and throughout bilges and around studs. Also additional strengthening of 3x overlapping
3/4oz e-glass biaxial with west system epoxy to corners, facings, and longitudinal cross beam to hull bond. Certainly the floors are closer on Clyde Wanderer and as you say this keel is heavier. Have attatched photos of what is being done currently. Clyde wanderer when you say you increased the bilge stub was that done on the inside or outside?

The bilge stub ( area of hull where top of keel mates to) was glassed on inside, no glassing was done on outside of hull.
How thick are the cross floors in these pics?
C_W
 
Top