chriss999
Well-Known Member
Seems a great boat. Why not keep it and use it when you’ve recovered from the op. Something nice to look forward to.
And often are pointing out things which you might not care about but future buyers might - and so affect your ability to sell quickly for maximum price.Getting a survey on a boat is a bit like having a survey when you buy a house. It may not tell you much that you don't already know (although in this case it would), but is there to satisfy your lender that the house is sound and value greater than the loan. So if you want to insure your £25k you may have no alternative but the spend the £500 and get a survey.
But I’m sure that part of your original complaint was that there were a lot of defects which you had to spend time and money on sorting?Why criticise? I have no issue with the vessel itself. I was aware of its condition before doing the deal, it is only the date of manufacture which is the fly in the ointment.
The only issue with the age really is that you need a hull survey you were not expecting to have
Yes, I think that is just another of the OP's misunderstandings due to lack of experience (a case of Rumsfeld's "unknown unknowns" springs to mind).But does he really need to have a hull survey? Or is it just the particular policy he chose that would require one? Other policies are available. Not all will need a hull survey.
Gosh...I am very au fait with Small Claims litigation so will need no advice with that. ;-) I have a dozen or so cases under my belt and won every one, including taking on the NatWest who tried to financially destroy me after the 2008 crash.
All the best with the operation, hope everything goes brilliantly with thatI don't want it to turn into a legal fight, it should not be necessary; just a 'bullet in reserve'. Besides that, I am waiting to go into hospital for open heart surgery and don't want the stress of having to brush up on my knowledge, my last case was a few years ago (invoices owed by a Housing Association).
All of the undeclared faults point to is being deliberately mis-described but I'll keep my powder dry for now. It may all be able to be resolved amicably, or the broker might get far more than I expect on its sale.
Gosh...
I have managed to luck through life without ever having to take out small claims litigation. Must be the odd one out.
Going to court under the law of contract, common law against a private individual or even consumer legislation against a trader are in a different league from the sort of things you mention. Like you I have had success in the small claims court on 2 occasions, and both were settled without a hearing simply because the other parties knew they would lose and filing a claim was just a tactic to get them to recognise the claim was valid under the legislation. Still took a lot of pressure to get them to actually pay up.Have you been a car restorer, contractor and retailer for the last 45 years? Tragically litigation is sometimes necessary as a last resort, when all other methods have failed. Examples include unpaid invoices, tenant arrears / damage, eviction and defending myself against the Natwest who tried to financially destroy me in 2011. That one cost them £24k plus all costs. Which was nice but a very stressful two years. That was when I became skilled in the art of litigation in person. Now? I would definitely need to brush up. ;-)