Atalanta of Chester/Hanne Knutsen trial

DJE

Well-known member
Joined
21 Jun 2004
Messages
7,660
Location
Fareham
www.casl.uk.com
Anyone provide a linky to the legal consequences of entering the exclusion zone?

Byelaws here:-

http://www.southamptonvts.co.uk/admin/content/files/PDF_Downloads/Soton Byelaws.pdf

Penalties on page 18:

fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale

Which seems to be £1,000 here:-

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1982/48/part/III/crossheading/introduction-of-standard-scale-of-fines

Fairly light penalties might explain why these charges were not brought?
 
Last edited:

toad_oftoadhall

New member
Joined
28 Jun 2007
Messages
3,910
Location
Med/Scotland/South Coast
Visit site
Last edited:

bozlite

Member
Joined
17 Sep 2011
Messages
136
Location
Nottingham
Visit site
Strict Liability Contempt under the Contempt of Court Act 1981
The strict liability rule may render the publication a contempt regardless of any intent to interfere with the course of justice in the proceedings. Refer to The Law, earlier in this guidance, applies:

to publications (including broadcasts , websites and other online or text-based communication) addressed to the public at large or any section of the public;

(From the CPS website)

And the next paragraph begins:

"which create a serious risk that the course of public justice will be seriously impeded or prejudiced"

It's very unlikely to apply when a case is being heard by a judge (without a jury) because the assumption is that judges are perfectly capable of not being swayed by anything that is not presented as evidence to them in the court.
 

l'escargot

New member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
19,777
Location
Isle of Wight / Jersey
Visit site
I thought that entering the exclusion zone was an offence in itself. If so I don't see why they didn't charge him with that? Or is 'impeding' what you do if you enter the exclusion zone? [1] If so is the ship required to hold a steady speed and course as required by Rule 17? Or is there some doubt if the exclusion zone applied or not?

Anyone provide a linky to the legal consequences of entering the exclusion zone?

[1] Impede sounds a bit IRPCS to me, rather than local by laws.

Or perhaps he didn't enter the exclusion zone by his action or inaction, the ship turning back placed him in the exclusion zone?
 

Vara

Active member
Joined
20 Feb 2004
Messages
7,015
Location
Canterbury/Dover
Visit site
Strict Liability Contempt under the Contempt of Court Act 1981
The strict liability rule may render the publication a contempt regardless of any intent to interfere with the course of justice in the proceedings. Refer to The Law, earlier in this guidance, applies:

to publications (including broadcasts , websites and other online or text-based communication) addressed to the public at large or any section of the public;

(From the CPS website)

Wise words but apparently wasted. :)

Discussing an ongoing trial on a forum is the height of folly.
 

DJE

Well-known member
Joined
21 Jun 2004
Messages
7,660
Location
Fareham
www.casl.uk.com
Wise words but apparently wasted. :)

Discussing an ongoing trial on a forum is the height of folly.

http://www.yourrights.org.uk/yourrights/right-of-free-expression/contempt-of-court/about-contempt-of-court.html

Two important limitations on the impact of the strict liability rule are:

It applies only to a publication which creates a substantial risk that the course of justice in the proceedings will be seriously impeded or prejudiced.
It applies to a publication only if the proceedings are active.


So you think that there is a substantial risk that a judge will be seriously prejudiced by this forum. I can't really see how.
 

toad_oftoadhall

New member
Joined
28 Jun 2007
Messages
3,910
Location
Med/Scotland/South Coast
Visit site
Or perhaps he didn't enter the exclusion zone by his action or inaction, the ship turning back placed him in the exclusion zone?

My faith in British Justice is (just about) strong enough to discount the possibility that the MCA would decline to prosecute for the exclusion offence because the ship was behaving unpredictable and shifting the zone, but then prosecute for impeding this weaving ship.

Nonsense. Anyone not involved in the trial is free to talk about it as much as they want.

+1
 

Vara

Active member
Joined
20 Feb 2004
Messages
7,015
Location
Canterbury/Dover
Visit site
Nonsense. Anyone not involved in the trial is free to talk about it as much as they want.

Talking about and publishing matter of fact or opinion are entirely different, it's why reporters only quote verbatim from court proceedings and why the media don't comment on cases until the verdict is in.

On twitter when ever there is a high profile case often the legal eagles will caution people to be aware of contempt of court.
 

l'escargot

New member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
19,777
Location
Isle of Wight / Jersey
Visit site
Talking about and publishing matter of fact or opinion are entirely different, it's why reporters only quote verbatim from court proceedings and why the media don't comment on cases until the verdict is in.

On twitter when ever there is a high profile case often the legal eagles will caution people to be aware of contempt of court.

It can only be contempt of court if an order has been issued banning reporting and that order is ignored. The presumption must be that orders cannot be issued routinely as it counters freedom of speech and orders are only issued in very specific circumstances. No order restricting reporting has been issued in this case unless you know otherwise?
 

rotrax

Well-known member
Joined
17 Dec 2010
Messages
15,777
Location
South Oxon and Littlehampton.
Visit site
I have given my view before about Yacht Clubs putting racing courses across heavily used navigation channels. Chichester springs to mind.
Coming, as I do from a heavily regulated-and quite right too-Motor Sport background it is akin to me putting a rally stage or a sprint course on a public road.
It is not too difficult to find out what shipping movements will happen in the Solent.
This is a potential cause for fresh legislation surely.
 

bozlite

Member
Joined
17 Sep 2011
Messages
136
Location
Nottingham
Visit site
Talking about and publishing matter of fact or opinion are entirely different, it's why reporters only quote verbatim from court proceedings and why the media don't comment on cases until the verdict is in.

On twitter when ever there is a high profile case often the legal eagles will caution people to be aware of contempt of court.

My understanding is that the case is being held in front of a district judge without a jury. The chances of judge being influenced by the views expressed on a discussion forum are considered to be non-existent. It is unthinkable that any discussion here could be seen as contempt.
 

flaming

Well-known member
Joined
24 Mar 2004
Messages
15,773
Visit site
I have given my view before about Yacht Clubs putting racing courses across heavily used navigation channels. Chichester springs to mind.
Coming, as I do from a heavily regulated-and quite right too-Motor Sport background it is akin to me putting a rally stage or a sprint course on a public road.
It is not too difficult to find out what shipping movements will happen in the Solent.
This is a potential cause for fresh legislation surely.

Cowes week racing from the squadron line dates back to the 1800s. Tanker traffic into and out of Fawley doesn't.

If there's a problem with the two meeting why should it be the tankers that have priority? After all Cowes week racing is planned years in advance and only lasts from circa 1000 until circa 1600. Even during Cowes week there are 18 other hours of the day when there is no racing.
 

A1Sailor

...
Joined
4 Jul 2004
Messages
32,006
Location
Banned from Rockall
Visit site
It can only be contempt of court if an order has been issued banning reporting and that order is ignored. The presumption must be that orders cannot be issued routinely as it counters freedom of speech and orders are only issued in very specific circumstances. No order restricting reporting has been issued in this case unless you know otherwise?

The only thing known is that yesterday the Daily Echo was reporting proceedings, court was due to sit at 10am today and no proceedings have been reported today.
Maybe the reporter has a broken finger. Maybe the court has restricted reporting. Which seems more likely?
 

fireball

New member
Joined
15 Nov 2004
Messages
19,453
Visit site
I have given my view before about Yacht Clubs putting racing courses across heavily used navigation channels. Chichester springs to mind.
Coming, as I do from a heavily regulated-and quite right too-Motor Sport background it is akin to me putting a rally stage or a sprint course on a public road.
It is not too difficult to find out what shipping movements will happen in the Solent.
This is a potential cause for fresh legislation surely.
Not a significant amount of commercial traffic in Chichester ... and all traffic - racing or not - should abide by colregs & bylaws ... racing rules only apply between racing vessels.
 

DJE

Well-known member
Joined
21 Jun 2004
Messages
7,660
Location
Fareham
www.casl.uk.com
Cowes week racing from the squadron line dates back to the 1800s. Tanker traffic into and out of Fawley doesn't.

If there's a problem with the two meeting why should it be the tankers that have priority? After all Cowes week racing is planned years in advance and only lasts from circa 1000 until circa 1600. Even during Cowes week there are 18 other hours of the day when there is no racing.

Since that incident ABP have a pilot working with the race committee at the Squadron during Cowes week and he is in contact with the pilots on the ships.
 

DAKA

Well-known member
Joined
7 Jan 2005
Messages
9,229
Location
Nomadic
Visit site
Cowes week racing from the squadron line dates back to the 1800s. Tanker traffic into and out of Fawley doesn't.

If there's a problem with the two meeting why should it be the tankers that have priority? .

IRPCS ?

I suspect Atalanta shares your view that sail still has sole right of use of the solent .
 

flaming

Well-known member
Joined
24 Mar 2004
Messages
15,773
Visit site
IRPCS ?

I suspect Atalanta shares your view that sail still has sole right of use of the solent .

You misunderstand - not priority under COLREGS - obviously they have that inside the Solent. But if it's deemed too unsafe for tankers to enter and exit the Solent whilst racing is taking place (I don't think it is btw), or conversely too unsafe for racing to take place from the squadron line whilst tankers are entering and exiting then why is it assumed that this should mean racing would stop?
 
Top