awol
Well-Known Member
Lots of bridges on the M25
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-47679224
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-47679224
How do your propose they deal with them?What a gross over-reaction by plod.
What a gross over-reaction by plod.
How do your propose they deal with them?
How do your propose they deal with them?
How would you risk assess a flare from an unknown source having been kept outdoors for a indeterminate length of time being stable when moved?By assessing the risk and reacting proportionately, as I did as a firefighter when I came across hazardous items, such as acetylene cylinders which are far more hazardous than a flare. What conceivable risk to motorway traffic, above the risk posed everyday by flares in various locations, was posed by a flare next to a canal?
What a gross over-reaction by plod.
It wasn't identified as a flare until after the response had started. So the response was for an unidentified suspicious device.
Exactly - and "flares" can be a lot bigger than the hand-held variety.
How would you risk assess a flare from an unknown source having been kept outdoors for a indeterminate length of time being stable when moved?
Personally, I'd get the people with the knowledge and skills to handle that; it's a bit late when a chemical reaction starts when you lifting it off the ground or above the fuel tank in the back of the panda car. Our risk tolerance is a personal thing. I'd rather stick around for a few more years rather than be maimed or killed because some eejit could not be bothered to dispose a flare properly.
I'd be interested to know who takes the decision. Is it Plod, before someone who knows what he's doing arrives, or is it the bloke who's going to deal with it? In either case, how much latitude do they have? Do they decide, or are there regulations they have to follow even though they're inappropriate for the particular situation?