Anchoring problem in Brighton

Gary Fox

N/A
Joined
31 Oct 2020
Messages
2,027
Visit site
In days gone past, we used to mine the coasts to deter enemy vessels.
With today's hi-tech ordnance, it would be straightforward to record the acoustic signature of each supertrawler, and programme the mines accordingly.
 

Mark-1

Well-known member
Joined
22 Sep 2008
Messages
4,396
Visit site
Greenpeace expands boulder barrier in marine protected area as government fails to strengthen safeguards | Greenpeace UK

"Greenpeace UK notified all the relevant marine authorities immediately upon deploying each boulder to ensure safety for all mariners operating in the area."

The fact they did it for each boulder suggests positions are known. In which case I can't see how it stops trawling.

Also no mention of Greenpeace recovering them. Which makes me think that's not true.

PS, this is 45km offshore, not really my definition of 'off Brighton'.
 
Last edited:

Mark-1

Well-known member
Joined
22 Sep 2008
Messages
4,396
Visit site
In days gone past, we used to mine the coasts to deter enemy vessels.
With today's hi-tech ordnance, it would be straightforward to record the acoustic signature of each supertrawler, and programme the mines accordingly.

Can we not blow up the Russian ones please? (I've seen "Enemy at the Gates", I really don't want WW3.)
 

Stemar

Well-known member
Joined
12 Sep 2001
Messages
23,967
Location
Home - Southampton, Boat - Gosport
Visit site
I don't think you can compare trawling to any kind of farming. Fishing is industrial-strength hunting/gathering.
And totally non-selective. If the money boys were on board, I'd vote for torpedoing them, but a good proportion of the crews are likely to fit the definition of modern slavery, and they don't deserve that.
 

WoodyP

Well-known member
Joined
18 Aug 2004
Messages
5,144
Location
West Wales
Visit site
I have been out on a shrimp trawler. The amount of by catch of juvenile bass and other fish was astonishing. Our fishing industry is not interested in the long term good of the environment. The small value of the shellfish industry is not going to persuade me that the damage that they wreak is worthwhile.
 

Pete7

Well-known member
Joined
11 Aug 2004
Messages
4,085
Location
Gosport
Visit site
A new reef, when it's established will be great for divers.
Create a few homes for sea creatures too in what looks like a fairly flat bottom and a feature for fish to hide behind out of the tide. Why are they pissing around with small rocks? there is 70ft of concrete sitting on the bottom of Brixham harbour at the moment which needs shifting.
 

Ravi

Active member
Joined
18 Jun 2013
Messages
780
Location
NorthEast England ... Greece (Kalamata)
Visit site
I suppose it helps to publicise the gov's general weakness on dealing with our coastal waters, from foreign supertrawlers ruining the seabed, to the illegal immigrants using UKBF as a taxi service to a life of benefits.
I don't think the trawlers will be bothered though...
It's almost a pity they did it near Brighton, which has, or had, a Green Party MP and is a laughing-stock for that reason.

yes, it is the FOREIGN supertrawlers. note that they are FOREIGN. They have no UK ownership, crew or contractual dealings. it is the nasty FOREIGN supertrawlers. There are no bad BRITISH supertrawlers. All BRITISH supertrawlers are good and super.

And, as you point out, anything that is not the fault of FOREIGN supertrawlers is undoubtedly the fault of FOREIGN "illegal immigrants".

You are also completely right that it is all the fault of the city of Brighton who have had the temerity to continue to vote - for decades in a row - for Green party politicians. How dare they exercise their democratic right to vote for who they want. Outrageous! To do something like that, they must surely be foreign!
 

Gary Fox

N/A
Joined
31 Oct 2020
Messages
2,027
Visit site
By what practical and legal methods can this industrial-scale over-fishing be controlled?
We can't use legal action or force in other countries' waters.
Our own supine namby-pamby government won't do anything.
Greenpeace have raised a bit of awareness with the boulder stunt, whatever, but nothing will change without determined legal action, physically enforced by armed vessels.
 

Pete7

Well-known member
Joined
11 Aug 2004
Messages
4,085
Location
Gosport
Visit site
By what practical and legal methods can this industrial-scale over-fishing be controlled?
We can't use legal action or force in other countries' waters.
Our own supine namby-pamby government won't do anything.
Greenpeace have raised a bit of awareness with the boulder stunt, whatever, but nothing will change without determined legal action, physically enforced by armed vessels.

We can't control other countries waters, well not any more though we might have done in the days of the Empire.

However, we do attempt to control our own waters:

Overseas Patrol Squadron | Royal Navy
 

Adios

...
Joined
20 Sep 2020
Messages
2,390
Visit site
I don't think I appreciated how big these super trawlers are until this picture. I'm with the environment to a point, need to eat but need to do it with minimal damage so preserving the environment the food develops in, obviously you'd think. Do we in the UK even eat what they trawl for?

1615334325077.png
 

Rappey

Well-known member
Joined
13 Dec 2019
Messages
4,564
Visit site
I believe the fisheries protection vessel that does or did operate out of portsmouth was quite active as used to hear fisherman moaning about being bored and checked.
 
Top