KevinV
Well-Known Member
The problem with the Internet is that there is no landlord to tell you it's time to go home when you're getting repetitive

You can lead a horse to water but a pencil must be lead.300 series stainless steel, which includes 302, 304, 316 and anything else that starts 3xx, is austenitic. The difference between them is compositional. It makes no difference, they cannot be strengthened by heat treatment. In every alloy I can think of, annealing results in the weakest form.
My anchor matches my bow roller perfectly well thank you. In fact I had the whole stem head fitting off last year and had strengthening bits welded in plus a bit added to hold the Spade anchor in place. I even took the Spade anchor into the stainless fabrication shop to model how I wanted it to fit. I also had new bow rollers port and starboard turned up in a suitable composite plastic while I was at it.I wonder why there are many technical documents that refer to annealing of stainless steel, although in the UK they seem to call it heat treating:
Some documents say 316S can't be annealed but only heat treated, BUT very few of the far Eastern stainless steels are 316S, most just say that in the paperwork and labels, they are often 302 or 304, and they are very bad news when not treated. Worse still the copies are often recycled stainless that does not even reach the 302 standard, although that steel does tarnish making it easy to figure out it's not a good stainless. I've got some in my garden that is almost starting to rust, and it's also more susceptible to crevice corrosion. There is a lot of confusion in the documents I've seen about how stainless can be treated, as some call it annealing, others say heat treated and even hot work hardening. It's probably best to just call it treated stainless, as I probably should not have used the term annealing as there are a whole bunch of different types of processes and treatments, this is the one used for some rigging terminals:
Furnace process. HARD-INOX. (gerster.ch)
OK so your anchor does not match the bow roller set up. It often makes sense to sort that issue out, rather than introduce a weak link. The issue is not your particular swivel as it's probably a genuine one, but many boaters get conned by copies that look real good, and that is one of the dangers of using stainless, you can't tell good from bad. I've seen a lot of failures of rigging in particular that was traced to bad copies. If you get a bad copy of a steel part, the main issue is the increased rust.
I've checked the tests, but no real independent results for fatigue life.
The CQR is very much a born again new generation anchor, particularly as regards the Lewmar stainless version. The Spade is much better on a short scope, but most boaters don't like rusty anchors that are fairly easily bent, although tougher than many other new generation anchors. They need to produce a Mk 2 with a thicker shank, Zinc layer and no daft yellow paint to chip off.
Anyone seen a Herreshof fishermans, as that's one anchor I woulde lke to find, although it would need to be a used one ??
Also curios about the blue paint, (Might be a label), on the Lewmar PGX Danforth, so if anyone is using one, it would be good to know how it wears ??
(in adenoidal voice) "Actually, I think you will find that a pencil has to be graphite"You can lead a horse to water but a pencil must be lead.
Ok smarty pants. I’m just not sure who’s got lead in their pencil now.(in adenoidal voice) "Actually, I think you will find that a pencil has to be graphite"
Graphite “composite” is a great material for making anchors and chain! (But only if you add a lot of iron!)Ok smarty pants. I’m just not sure who’s got lead in their pencil now.
(And yes I know it’s a composite graphite in pencils really…)
WhooshGraphite “composite” is a great material for making anchors and chain! (But only if you add a lot of iron!)
CQR anchors are beloved by people who can’t or won’t realise that anchors have moved on for the better. A bit like people who say that the boat to cross an ocean in must have a long keel. Anything else is a death trap. I used to swear by my CQR. Then I realised how short sighted I was and what a fool I’d been.
(in adenoidal voice) "Actually, I think you will find that a pencil has to be graphite"
The problem with the Internet is that there is no landlord to tell you it's time to go home when you're getting repetitive![]()
![]()
I don’t have any slots in our anchor rollers. The main rode ends at the swivel and then there’s three or four links from swivel to shackle to anchor. (To prevent the swivel getting jammed at an unnatural angle. ) The swivel is only there to allow whoever is in the bow to poke the anchor the right way round if it’s backwards…. A boomerang would do it equally well or better and I might change to one.You are far too hard on yourself. You got to where you are physically located now - because you came to the correct conclusions in the end.
Your choice of Spade was actually quite revolutionary - very few (other than the French) have adopted it. (There is a lot of nationalistic focus in anchor choice). Spade has spawned many of the new designs, specifically Rocna, Supreme, Ultra and Vulcan - and I see shades of Spade in the latest iteration, Epsilon. What Spade needed, at the time, was better marketing and distribution - a bit late now (design and fabrication has moved on).
I was not questioning your use of the Kong swivel, (perfectly safe and proven so) but it can need manual intervention (and the swivel makes this easier). There are other options, that self right the anchor automatically and the savings, financial, would buy you a decent malt whisky. But note that if you have slotted roller the Boomerang will not work (but jamb in the slot) you would need to look at NormanS iteration.
Take care, stay safe
Jonathan
Hi,
I am doing some reconnaissance regarding circumnavigating the UK. It would be spring probably, so we would be in Scotland in late April I guess. There is plenty of anchorages there but with possible storms, I need proper setup. I am thinking about 10 kg Delta anchor and chain... I know for the size of boat, 6 mm would be sufficient, but maybe 7 or 8 mm? But 6 mm is much lighter, with 8 mm chain I would have to have less (20, 25, 30? meters). I would like to pick brain of people who did that.
Does your boat have room for a second chain rode ?? Also are you thinking of using only one anchor ?? If not which type of secondary are you going to use ?? It's very important to select a good secondary, because unless you fancy diving on your anchor to see how it has set, using a single anchor is never going to result in a reliable result if you get unlucky and foul it with debris like tin cans on the points, plastic bags and even discarded fishing gear. 7mm is not a common size for chain, so it might be best to go for 8mm.
You might need to think about divinding the anchor locker into 2 sections., as trying to store 2 rodes in 1 locker can result in a tangle.
Read post 1 on anchor bottle opener testing. I promise it is worth the time.Some of the comment in this thread has me thinking again about my array of anchors 'for all conditions'.
I've acquired these for round-the-cans racing, where weight-saving is wanted....
![]()
What d'you think?
![]()
Read post 1 on anchor bottle opener testing. I promise it is worth the time.
Mantus anchor bottle opener testing