I would appreciate the picture, thanks a lot!My anchor roller is on a stainless assembly which has a hole drilled in the side of the “trough “ in which the chain runs out. I have a quick release sail coupling attached through this hole and use it to secure the foot of my cruising chute. The coupling is kept out of the way of the anchor and chain by the spinnaker halyard.
I use a 1m length of rope at the foot of the spinnaker to keep its foot above the pulpit.
I will be at the boat next week and can send a picture if you want
Cheers. It looks really strong. I tried kicking/pushing and jumping on it in different ways and it is not moving at all. I will try it out on our next crossing.That is easily strong enough. Ours is on the end of a 45mm carbon pole with a bobstay to the U bolt on the stem, and side stays to the ama tips. It’s 80sq m, I daresay your anchor fitting is stronger than that.
But it is - an existing structure, the bow roller is retained like this to support a 25kg Rocna Vulcan without hitting the hull. And it is a new thread asking if this could also work as a gennaker attachment pointIt all looks over engineered to me,
Why not use the existing structure as the support for a dedicated prodder for a gennaker, but retaining the existing bow roller for, dedicated, anchoring.
If you want ideas how to make better use of what you have - establish a new thread (that's what PBO is for).
Jonathan![]()
There are stainless steel backing plates for both the plates on the top and the angled-plate that the pipe is welded to.A Gennaker can exert a lot of vertical stress on a fitting and I like to see a vertical tang or internal brace to counter it.
I look at the photo and - yes its definitely grossly overengineered - BUT for anchoring. Any load UP will be using the lengthy of the fitting as a lever multiplier.
Therefore my question is : Apart from the external pipe and the welding to the stemhead plate. What vertical form is there to counter the load the Gennaker will put on it internally ?
To be honest - I would be looking to use the forestay point instead as that should have internal stiffening to counter vertical loads.