bluedragon
Active member
It's anode time again :-((
Well, for most of you it's no problem - seawater / zinc is a proven combination. But for those of us berthed in fresh water behind a barrage and sea lock (Cardiff Bay) it's a nightmare. Magnesium for freshwater, that's clear advice from Mg Duff and others, but go out to sea for even 2 weeks and it's mostly gone. 4-5 weeks, all gone in my case and it leaves a hard mineral deposit all over the metalwork it's protecting. There is also some evidence on my saildrive that over-protection is occurring (bubbles in the drive paint). I'm nervous now about using Mg anodes again.
Changing the anode to Zinc before leaving for summer cruise (and then back again) is the "advised" solution, but to avoid the hassle and cost a lot of boaters here seem to think Aluminium alloy anodes are the magic answer for fresh water as they are suitable for "brackish" water. However, this is not always confirmed by some of the reading I've done. The problem with Zn is that supposedly the surface becomes "passive" after a week or so in fresh water, and then it doesn't work at all. But how do the Al alloy anodes perform in this respect? Is it immune to the pacified effect in fresh water? Or is it just a slower process, allowing for more time in fresh water before going into salt? This is not clear to me from literature sources (opposing views) and local anecdotal advice / evidence is also confusing.
Do we have any real experts here on the forum who can help?
Thanks.
PS - before somebody suggest it, the idea of using hanging anodes connected to internal bonding won't work with a saildrive will it? The leg is electrically isolated from the engine I believe.
Well, for most of you it's no problem - seawater / zinc is a proven combination. But for those of us berthed in fresh water behind a barrage and sea lock (Cardiff Bay) it's a nightmare. Magnesium for freshwater, that's clear advice from Mg Duff and others, but go out to sea for even 2 weeks and it's mostly gone. 4-5 weeks, all gone in my case and it leaves a hard mineral deposit all over the metalwork it's protecting. There is also some evidence on my saildrive that over-protection is occurring (bubbles in the drive paint). I'm nervous now about using Mg anodes again.
Changing the anode to Zinc before leaving for summer cruise (and then back again) is the "advised" solution, but to avoid the hassle and cost a lot of boaters here seem to think Aluminium alloy anodes are the magic answer for fresh water as they are suitable for "brackish" water. However, this is not always confirmed by some of the reading I've done. The problem with Zn is that supposedly the surface becomes "passive" after a week or so in fresh water, and then it doesn't work at all. But how do the Al alloy anodes perform in this respect? Is it immune to the pacified effect in fresh water? Or is it just a slower process, allowing for more time in fresh water before going into salt? This is not clear to me from literature sources (opposing views) and local anecdotal advice / evidence is also confusing.
Do we have any real experts here on the forum who can help?
Thanks.
PS - before somebody suggest it, the idea of using hanging anodes connected to internal bonding won't work with a saildrive will it? The leg is electrically isolated from the engine I believe.
Last edited: