Why Are People So Down On Gel Batteries?

Conachair

Guest
Joined
24 Jan 2004
Messages
5,162
Location
London
Visit site
300 amps to charge batteries?? I think not my little demon friend!! Not unless you are towing a barge with your 3000 AH battery bank in it!

I did have to look this one up, being ever curious..

http://www.windsun.com/Batteries/Battery_FAQ.htm#AGM, or Absorbed Glass Mat Batteries


And, since the internal resistance is extremely low, there is almost no heating of the battery even under heavy charge and discharge currents. The Concorde (and most AGM) batteries have no charge or discharge current limits.

C/10 doesn't apply to agm. It seems.
 

oze

New member
Joined
27 Dec 2011
Messages
3
Location
Sydney
Visit site
If you are going to charge or trickle charge a 12V gel battery, it requires no more than 13.8 volts at full charge, and 13.2 volts at “maintenance/trickle” charge. Make sure that your charger either analyses, or can be set on, the lower voltage. Standard charging at 14.8 volts (or more) will cause the gel to dry and reduce life and cranking capacity. Charging at no more than 2 amps is also suggested.
 

Plevier

Active member
Joined
22 Aug 2008
Messages
3,594
Location
Brighton
Visit site
- For AGMs to be effective they need to be charged hard. Most liveaboard boats do not produce the optimum 300 or so amps required to charge them correctly.

I don't go with that.
An advantage of AGMs is that they will take high charge rates but it's not essential. Those sort of charge rates will only occur if you have taken the state of charge lower than you should anyway.
Having said that you don't want to charge too slowly, I would suggest having at least 20% (i.e. 20A per 100Ah) available.
Anyway that's incidental. FWIW I would have made the same choice as you have. I wondered if you'd got off the fence yet!
 

demonboy

Active member
Joined
11 Oct 2004
Messages
2,234
Location
Indonesia
www.youtube.com
Yes, I'm off the fence and sitting firmly in one camp now, Troubadour! Still waiting for the delivery of said batteries, mind, so I'm not a 6 volter just yet but the important step forward is me changing my mind about wets.
 

Embla

New member
Joined
23 Mar 2007
Messages
4
Visit site
Can anyone comment on the suitability of wet cell lead acid batteries when they are located underneath sleeping accommodation? I don't have any issue with maintenance regime, but what about danger from gas emissions? My last set of AGM's (4 * 100amp hr) lasted only 2 years, so assuming there is no health issues, I will revert to wet cell type. Also need to replace bow thruster / windlass battery bank (currently 5 yr old Optima RedTop) but I wonder if wet cell batteries will cope with the pounding as they are situated in the bow.
 

Richard10002

Well-known member
Joined
17 Mar 2006
Messages
18,979
Location
Manchester
Visit site
Can anyone comment on the suitability of wet cell lead acid batteries when they are located underneath sleeping accommodation? I don't have any issue with maintenance regime, but what about danger from gas emissions? My last set of AGM's (4 * 100amp hr) lasted only 2 years, so assuming there is no health issues, I will revert to wet cell type. Also need to replace bow thruster / windlass battery bank (currently 5 yr old Optima RedTop) but I wonder if wet cell batteries will cope with the pounding as they are situated in the bow.

I lived with 3 under the bed on a Moody 44 for the best part of 3 years without issue, and one in the bow for the bow thruster.

Having said that, my alternator only charged at 13.6v, so gassing was probably an impossibility, so perhaps my experience wasn't valid.
 

michael_w

Well-known member
Joined
8 Oct 2005
Messages
5,793
Visit site
I've got three flooded batteries under my berth. Only caused a problem when the old shore power charger went berserk and boiled everything dry.
 
Joined
24 Jan 2005
Messages
956
Location
Greece
Visit site
.......Also need to replace bow thruster / windlass battery bank (currently 5 yr old Optima RedTop) but I wonder if wet cell batteries will cope with the pounding as they are situated in the bow.
Batteries can be either starter or deep cycle that can deliver high cold cranking amps, but they must be chosen carefully. Starter batteries are designed to deliver high current for a few seconds, maybe only using 2-3 Ah, but bowthrusters may need high current for a minute or more. If 50 Ah are taken out then very large starter batteries will be needed to avoid a high depth of discharge which will kill a starter battery. This is a heavy load up in the bows, so a much better option would be much smaller and much lighter AGM batteries. Another point to consider is that starter batteries gas and must be vented to the outside – AGMs are safe anywhere.

Not all AGMs are the same - check they are made for deep cycle use.
 

Mistroma

Well-known member
Joined
22 Feb 2009
Messages
4,933
Location
Greece briefly then Scotland for rest of summer
www.mistroma.com
I've just replaced my batteries and purchased 4 Trojan T105s and one Optima Red top 4.2.

Everyone will have different usage patterns and life requirements vs. cost. All I can say is that I'm happy to maintain batteries and the cost was acceptable. I downloaded a spreadsheet that allows comparison of battery types. After entering my own power usage data it appeared to support purchase of AGMs. However, when I updated the actual UK purchase costs for AGM & T105s the picture changed completely.

So I decided to stick with flooded lead acid deep cycle batteries on a cost basis despite other disadvantages. However, I was worried about the lack of ventilation in the battery compartment. The original batteries were in an unvented locker underneath the berth in the aft cabin. I haven't had any problems but was surprised that the builder didn't think it was dangerous. I suspect that the charging regime is conservative but still noticed discolouration of the locker lid.

I'm currently installing a brushless vent fan with ducting to the stern.

So my opinion is that flooded batteries underneath a berth will work. However, if you want to charge more rapidly a ventilation system rapidly becomes a neccessity to keep Hydrogen concentration well below 4%. I'm aiming for <0.5% at point when gassing will be greatest.
 

AngusMcDoon

Well-known member
Joined
20 Oct 2004
Messages
8,830
Location
Up some Hebridean loch
Visit site
If you tried using you mobile phone battery from 10 years ago to run your mobile phone today, it'd last perhaps an hour.

Sony Ericsson P800, 2002 vintage, standard battery BST-15, 3.6V, Li-Po, 1000mAh.

Samsung Galaxy S2, 2012 vintage, standard battery 3.6V, Li-ion, 1000mAh.

Absolutely no difference. Methinks you know not what about you talk.
 
Joined
24 Jan 2005
Messages
956
Location
Greece
Visit site
.... I downloaded a spreadsheet that allows comparison of battery types. After entering my own power usage data it appeared to support purchase of AGMs. However, when I updated the actual UK purchase costs for AGM & T105s the picture changed completely.

To make the real comparison of AGMs versus flooded you must include the costs savings from the reduced engine or generator running costs. See pages 4-6 here:

http://www.vonwentzel.net/Battery/04.Costs/index.html

Lifeline AGMs come out as cheapest, but the I suppose you can prove anything with figures if you want to.
 

Mistroma

Well-known member
Joined
22 Feb 2009
Messages
4,933
Location
Greece briefly then Scotland for rest of summer
www.mistroma.com
To make the real comparison of AGMs versus flooded you must include the costs savings from the reduced engine or generator running costs. See pages 4-6 here:

http://www.vonwentzel.net/Battery/04.Costs/index.html

Lifeline AGMs come out as cheapest, but the I suppose you can prove anything with figures if you want to.

Graphs on link look exactly like ones on the spreadsheet I downloaded. Key point for me was that the costs were miles out for UK prices I could get. I entered data for power usage, battery prices and all other relevant data. The result persuaded me to go for T105s.

I did say that everyone had different usage patterns and mine probably suit T105s. I have records of engine hours, wind-gen output etc. for last few years. I would need to check but am pretty certain that I only ran the engine for 2-3 hours just for charging in 2011. I didn't count the cost of running the engine when actually travelling. I assumed that any difference in fuel cost was minimal when using the engine for propulsion. i.e. Fuel usage to charge AGM or flooded aren't significant when motoring at 7 knots. Could be wrong of course.

I suspect that many people use this spreadsheet without updating all the relevant data (including battery prices).
 

bjvarley

New member
Joined
22 May 2010
Messages
57
Location
On Alixora wherever we are (now Turkey))
alixora.posterous.com
The battery question is difficult but we have used standard (so called sealed) lead acid batteries for two years now .. deep cycled often.. if you take the plastic label off the top you will probably find regular filling plugs underneath . Ours needed about 1.5 Ltrs of distilled water after a year of use (not exactly maintenance free !)
 

canalcruiser

New member
Joined
15 Jun 2007
Messages
66
Location
At anchor mostly
Visit site
I bought two gel batteries in 2005,second hand,from an electric car.One lasted a few months and died.The other is still in perfect condition,not just consinged to running the bilge pump but for the last two years its a lighting and bilge dedicated battery charged with an 18w solar panel

12.92v as of this moment
 
Top