E39mad
Well-known member
MG C27 is 29' overall - transom hung rudder, self taker and can be had with a lifting keel or...
...if you have deep pockets a Pogo 30
...if you have deep pockets a Pogo 30
That was one of my suggestions
Not twin outboards but twin cylinder - which is sort of irrelevant as all outboards big enough for a 30' boat will be twins.None of the suggestions meet the twin outboard requirement and I can't think of anything in original state that would and can't think why the OP would want such a set up either.
And generally much inferior to an inboard diesel on a boat of that size and weight (tri's excepted)Not twin outboards but twin cylinder - which is sort of irrelevant as all outboards big enough for a 30' boat will be twins.
Someone - I think it was Dick Newick - said that if sailing boats had never been invented and you came up with the idea now and designed one from first principles, bearing in mind modern materials, it would come out as a trimaran.Obviously, opinion here is mostly in line with the NYYC, that’s not a yacht. Oddly my father said the same thing, that it’s not a yacht, it’s a sailing machine. He meant it admiringly though.
He would say that, of course. So would most multihull designers. And owners. We’ve never owned a monohull cruiser, our wooden classic dayboat is basically on the principle of ‘when in Rome…’ we never cruise her, she is solely a race boat. We’ve been multi sailors since 1989. Multis are logical, cats are theoretically the purest form, but other considerations make tris the better sailing boat, especially in smaller cruiser sizes. The folding tri for us is ideal. Power, performance and seakindliness, and still fits in with the modern sailboat parking facilities. It would otherwise be nuts to own a boat with a 24ft beam. The drawback is cost, but then, as someone pointed out, it’s not so far adrift from the cost of a really high performance mono, yet a DF920 will give a Pogo 30 a good spanking. The no.1 reason we’re not swamped with folding trimarans is conservatism in the market. A majority of our fellow club members seem to think of us as exceptionally brave lunatics risking our lives on every sail. Most would not even stand on our boat. Clearly the OP is a traditionalist and will not be giving the Dragonfly the slightest consideration even though it is the closest to his spec that he could buy, new or used. I see it as my mission to open peoples eyes to what the boat is, and what it can do.Someone - I think it was Dick Newick - said that if sailing boats had never been invented and you came up with the idea now and designed one from first principles, bearing in mind modern materials, it would come out as a trimaran.
Black mark (for my usage) if, in reality, that cockpit layout isn’t as single- handed friendly as it first looks. Which you mentioned up thread, with regard to jib sheet winch positioning. Presumably it’s the traveller which stops you being able to steer, with the tiller between your legs, and reach forward to handle the sheets?The 28 looks very similar to that. They do look a little gawky with the tent up. Still a very worthwhile extra though, whether the problem is sun or rain. We have one, I would always have one on a Dragonfly. The 28 is the ‘new’ replacement for the 920. The newer boats, with the plumb or reverse bows, are stiffer, more voluminous and fold more easily and smoothly than ours, which went out of production in 2007. They are not really noticeably quicker, and it’s still possible to win a race on MOCRA handicap in an older boat, though clearly most of the best racers have newer boats. The fit and finish is well up to the standard you’d hope for on a boat of this price, and only high quality chandlery is used at the factory. Every single block on ours is a Fredriksson ball race, batten cars the same. We have Andsersen winches, and some impressive stainless in house engineering for the folding mechanism.
We’ve convinced ourselves that we prefer the look of our boat over the plumb bow newer ones, but we all do that don’t we?
It’s just the distance. The 28 and 32 don’t have travellers, and have slightly shorter cockpits. The 920 is by no means impossible, I know Angus had one for nearly 20 years I think, and single handed it. But it does have a traveller, and it’s over 5ft from the end of the tiller to the jib winches. You’d need a bit of technique to dodge the mainsheet it's true,, because of the traveller. But growing longer arms is harder. I have never tried ours single handed except when Mrs C is using the head. And we’d probably avoid that ‘just about to tack’ moment.Black mark (for my usage) if, in reality, that cockpit layout isn’t as single- handed friendly as it first looks. Which you mentioned up thread, with regard to jib sheet winch positioning. Presumably it’s the traveller which stops you being able to steer, with the tiller between your legs, and reach forward to handle the sheets?
(Apologies to OP from thread hijack!)
Maybe she used the last two for the veto if the performance seemed a bit much. Really, they’re a pussy cat. At 10kn it’s serene, ok 15 is quite exciting I will admit that more, for a sustained period of time, requires a certain firmness of attitude and is really for racing only. Ours is definitely verging on scary at 19 knots on the odd occasion we’ve seen it. The noise and spray are intimidating too. But not at ordinary Dragonfly speeds. 8-9kn hard on the wind you get used to very quickly, which is the sort of wind you’ll reach at 15. You can still put the kettle on at 15kn, and apart from looking ahead, the boat will not demand all of your attention. A test sail would sort her out. Though you might also like to try anchoring for lunch on a swimming day. I know of no boat that can do that better.Sigh. I wanted to buy a Dragonfly 28. Sadly, it got vetoed by the missus. Too sporty, too cramped, too expensive was her view.
Maybe I should have taken her to see a 920 instead.
Don’t get me wrong, I love my boat, but I still feel wistful whenever I see a dragonfly.