Danny Jo
Well-Known Member
This strategm, recommended by a number of posters on this forum, is a source of continuing fascination to me. I won't say more, other than to wonder how many subscribe to it.
Last edited:
Exactly what I was thinking.Those that do clearly don't sail in congested waters - they would never get out of harbour.![]()
There are many cruising areas where ships are rare. There is a TSS near Hollyhead, but the most common ships seen are the Irish Ferries. In general I make sure I don't get in their way, pass astern & make it ckear with an early course change if one is required.
Clearly it is a different matter in narrow channels, but it isn't any problem for me to sail outside the channel - I only draw 3'10" ish. For other leisure craft, I also tend to "avoid being a nuisance" if I can.
In general, if you are not close, there is no collision risk & Colregs have little relevance. QED
Far more worrying are the fast 'reefers' and Handymax bulkers(
RTIR capability
Give us a clue, something about Infra Red? or something organised by ISC? I googled it but I'm still none the wiser.
jonjo;2265523). AIS showed the thundering beast heading towards me at 35 knots and a CPA fluctuating under 0.2 NM. So for the first time in my sailing career I called up another ship and asked the ferry on VHF if he had me on radar. Two or 3 minutes later the Condor thundered out of the mist at a 1/2 a mile CPA.[/QUOTE said:As a matter of interest did you get a reply on VHF?
.... I cannot disagree more than politely say "Rubbish" !Those that do clearly don't sail in congested waters - they would never get out of harbour.
Give us a clue, something about Infra Red? or something organised by ISC? I googled it but I'm still none the wiser.
As I agreed his post and he is not around right now, let me explain.To L'Escargot about ... .... I cannot disagree more than politely say "Rubbish"
A pretty comprehensive response. I would just add that at no time have I suggested applying "steam gives way to sail" to large vessels. But I would say that anyone who subscribes to a practice that includes "...never mind the IRPCS..." is a fool.As I agreed his post and he is not around right now, let me explain.
The original title of the thread is "When you see a ship, never mind the IRPCS, just get out of the way" Of course common sense says you don't use the "power gives way to sail" motto all the time, esp crossing the channel as Bilbo says. Conversely it is not always necessary to alter course just because a ship is in sight. This in itself can cause further problems, such as getting into the path of another vessel.
The Snails point is that sailors in busy waters such as the Solent, Thames estuary, etc are bound to encounter ships in close quarters, and one has to act accordingly.
Thinking things through and making decisions to stand on or alter course, rather than just turn and running, is good skippering IMVHO.
My point ref. the 'snails' reply - is based on both sides being daft !
Not only the 'get out of the way at all times' but also the implied 'IRPCS at all times' of 'snails' post.
I appreciate the intent was probably not to give that impression, but 'snails' post certainly gave me that impression.
I agree that in most circumstances that following the sensible IRPCS is the way, but there are times that prudent seamanship of bold and visible action on part of yachtie is preferred option.
It's like the example I gave many moons ago when asked by DTI examiner for one of my Merch Tickets ....
You are steaming along in clear waters, you observe a tug and tow approaching at distance port to stbd ... he is not showing any special signals to indicate difficulty to manoeuvre etc. What do you do ?
I answered that I would take compass bearings and determine if risk of collision exists. I would monitor the situation closely.
Given that he is not showing restricted ability signals, it is his to alter course and pass down my port side. But in respect of prudent seamanship, it is far easier for me to alter and not impede a tug and tow - by bold and obvious action to allow him to continue on. Making appropriate sound signal also.
the examiner praised me for giving up my position of stand-on vessel to allow the tug and tow to proceed.
But of course on these forums - I would have been failed.... despite fact that DTI granted my ticket and were very hapy with the answer.