Jamesuk
Well-Known Member
If Hallberg Rassy did an 885 Wow, I would buy one of them
Something with hydrofoils: http://www.wingo.com/dakh/williwaw.html & video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cYXxZiL4B8
Enough engine grunt to foil under engine.
I guess carbon fibre hull?
Latest junk rig sails
Positive buoyancy built in.
Self righting if Trimaran.
Silent solar-electric auxiliary engine system for just pottering around.
employing discreet modern tricks for furling...not exactly in-yard forecourse reefing, but no need to go aloft when it's getting hairy, either.
That would need too many crew. It would take ages to get all the sails up to get going. In practical for pottering along the coast and anchoring on a whim in a bay with an interesting restaurant on the beach.......
If we won a significant amount on the next lottery, we would keep the boat we've got, and buy two more of them - one to moor in NW Spain and one in the Med. Save all that boring slog from place to place and just nip over for a long weekend sailing.
Why not pay the paid hands to do the boring bits? (Or just get a delivery company to move the boat around).
They can get lost for the weekend when you are there.
For long distance cruising
One of these
View attachment 32784
With one of these on board
View attachment 32785
Best of both worlds, each perfect for the job.
You're planning to ship a focsle full of lithe young paid hands...
I had meant not to have roller-blind furling...I was thinking of lines running through eyelets up the sail, at points a few feet apart, which allow it to be 'flaked' upward, below the yard, from a safely remote spot. Can't remember what that's called.
Buntlines. They're standard on any square sail since (at a guess) the early 1700s.
Ah! I don't hold with these newfangled ideas.
Isn't it enough just to reduce the exposed surface of the sail to a flaked foot or eighteen inches of depth along the yard?
Isn't it enough just to reduce the exposed surface of the sail to a flaked foot or eighteen inches of depth along the yard?