petem
Well-Known Member
I blame ITV for cancelling Bullseye.
Agreed 100%True on paper, but that's a reasoning which I already heard at least a couple of decades ago.
In spite of that, the boating industry didn't do much since then - aside from building on top of planing hulls some trawler resembling superstructures (mostly meant to appeal a greenish fashion than anything else).
Imho, the simple truth can be summarized in two points:
1) Mobos (ANY of them!) are a silly way to travel, and they are much better exploited as floating caravans, to really enjoy the sea rather than "fighting" it in long passages which inevitably include night cruising, the odd bad weather, etc.
I accept that some folks like that instead, but they are the exception that proves the rule.
2) When mobos are used as floating caravans, fuel is an almost trivial component, in the big scheme of boat ownership costs.
Sure, the overall running costs of 2 x 15 liters engines are higher compared to 1 x 6 liter (which is the ballpark difference for a P vs. D 50 footer), but for anyone who care to do a bit of proper math, the difference is nowhere near enough to become a critical factor in the decision.
Nigel I don't get the regenerative part, and it's a major point in this context. Regeneration is huge in cars but non existent in planes and boats. Unless you mean wind generation, in which case you might as well just sailI’d love it if one of the UK manafactures really went for it in terms of a long legged, regenerative, hybrid motor cat or even monohull....
Nigel I don't get the regenerative part, and it's a major point in this context. Regeneration is huge in cars but non existent in planes and boats. Unless you mean wind generation, in which case you might as well just sail
Agreed 100%
I'm not as negative as Deleted User on the future of diesel/oil fuel. Electricity has a huge future in things like cars where you're in dense cities and where otherwise wasted braking energy is recovered, but in situations where there is nothing to recover and you need enormous joules per kilo or per litre (namely planes and boats) oil has imho a longer future than Deleted User predicts.
I don't disagree your general thrust here Nigel but you have to be mindful of quantities using current solar power and battery tech. Your 4x140w might on a good day make 6.7kwh (I've assumed they run at that output 12 hours, which is generous). That's about 20 megajoules. Diesel contains is 3.5 MJ per litre, so your panels make the same energy quantity as say 10 litres of diesel (allowing for inefficient burn), which is a side show rounding difference in the context of the boating market/industry imho.House ac/dc John, just a little effort in wind/hydro and solar would be a selling point.
With 4 x 140w panels I can sit at anchor for 24 hours, (in PT), and break even. Hot water needs to be made and that’s an opportunity also, considering the solar panel and tank I have on the roof in the the house here keeps us going all day.
So I think that the perception of boondocking for weeks at an anchorage with no need to wind up the gen set and a deisel electric power train for long legged globe trotting is a thing that will happen.
What about a solar motor sail, great to lean into the heel and making some juice in the way?
Of course, without huge advances in battery tech - we’re a ways off from a Tesla of the oceans but then again, the deisel electric submarines that I served on in the 80’s could run silent for several days at a time.
But my point is more that there’s not one U.K. builder making a motor boat for a for a full time couple, like Ann and I, not one building wonderlust Catamarans and no one is pushing the envelope in terms of carbon low habitation.
Of course, there are sail boats but I can’t help thinking that MY builders are not trying hard enough.
Yep, and I'm not massively arguing with you. But if fuel became 3x today's price due to tax hikes would it really stop everyone boating? When I started out with a fairline 42 in 1999 fuel was 20p. Now is is 6x or more. I would have bought that boat then if fuel were 120p then. A big fuel rise will imho impact behaviours but not the very existence of boating per se. Man has always pleasure boated.I hope youre right given the fact that our son is currently doing a Masters degree in Petroleum Geoscience. IMHO the future use of oil for powering pleasure boats is not about availability or alternative technologies but about politics. As I said, in a world where road vehicle buyers are going to be coerced to go electric and with revenue from fuel duty decreasing as a result, its a pretty good bet that govts are going to ramp up taxes on fossil fuels massively, except obviously for essential industries where there is no alternative. Then it is also a good bet that the environmental lobby are going to be more successful at persuading govts to ban fossil fuelled craft from some areas which are deemed environmentally sensitive, or at least fossil fuelled pleasure craft. I'm not saying this is going to happen this year, next year or anytime soon but maybe in a 20-40yr time scale. There is also a huge marketing opportunity here. Any boat builder that introduces new technology to the market that is going to allow motorboats to be significantly more fuel efficient than current gas guzzling gin palaces is going to clean up. Btw by that I dont mean a hybrid boat that can power a boat at 5kts for 5 miles but a boat that can cruise for say 100 miles at 20kts
Well, myself and swmbo will be 78-98 yo by then.maybe in a 20-40yr time scale
That’s interesting because where we are in Spain they have cleared out half of the sub 20ft spaces and put in 40 ft plus boats sideways on. I’ve been in the marina for 10 years and at 37ft used to feel that I had a large boat, now I’m feeling quite average......this is where you go ahhhhhh!From a non-representative observation of just one marina, the occupancy is "up" compared to 5 years ago.
But the average size of boat has shrunk: there are plenty of smaller, newer boats with outboards, Merry Fishers and so on.
There are fewer 30-45ft boats from what I can see.
I don't disagree your general thrust here Nigel but you have to be mindful of quantities using current solar power and battery tech. Your 4x140w might on a good day make 6.7kwh (I've assumed they run at that output 12 hours, which is generous). That's about 20 megajoules. Diesel contains is 3.5 MJ per litre, so your panels make the same energy quantity as say 10 litres of diesel (allowing for inefficient burn), which is a side show rounding difference in the context of the boating market/industry imho.
alternators on trim tabs, wind resistance turbines
But my point is more that there’s not one U.K. builder making a motor boat for a for a full time couple, like Ann and I, not one building wonderlust Catamarans and no one is pushing the envelope in terms of carbon low habitation.
Of course, there are sail boats but I can’t help thinking that MY builders are not trying hard enough.
My maths is ok BB.Maths gone a bit awry there as diesel engines are what? 30% efficient?
Yup exactly. There is nothing free about energy from alternators on trim tabs, on a mobo.Wouldn't both of those cause greater fuel burn?
I’m going to ask, regardless of the fear of coming across as a numpty...but if say I dragged two canes along the ground, one in each hand; one had a blunt base and the other a wheel, would the one with the wheel be needing less or more energy than the one being dragged - if there’s force going over the trim tab that’s effectively being burned, couldn’t it be captured?Yup exactly. There is nothing free about energy from alternators on trim tabs, on a mobo.
Yup exactly. There is nothing free about energy from alternators on trim tabs, on a mobo.
It ain't "burned", if by that you mean wasted - it's converted into additional hull lift.if there’s force going over the trim tab that’s effectively being burned, couldn’t it be captured?
True, this is indeed a possible "free" source of energy.If moored in tidal stream, you could enjoy some "free" energy for 99% the lifetime of most boats