What happened to the youngster?

NPMR

Well-known member
Joined
14 Feb 2006
Messages
2,271
Location
Cornwall
Visit site
I managed not to see one England Match but did they use the youngster they took with them?

If not why not? If yes, was he any good?

Woke up in the middle of the night worrying about it - why?
 

jhr

Well-known member
Joined
26 Nov 2002
Messages
20,258
Location
Royston Vasey
jamesrichardsonconsultants.co.uk
No, they didn't use Theo Walcott. I've no idea why, but the Guardian was suggesting that, having been talked into taking him by Arsene Wenger, Sven wasn't too impressed with him in practice matches, so didn't play him.

I saw him play at St Mary's a couple of times, when he was with Saints, and he was electrifying - the whole place came alive when he went on. However, Saints are (temporarily /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif) playing Championship football, and whether he will look as good against Premiership and International players is a question I don't have an answer to. But he was pretty good; I reckon that if he'd remained with Saints last season, rather than moving to the Arsenal Subs' bench, we would have made it to the playoffs /forums/images/graemlins/frown.gif.
 

bbg

Active member
Joined
2 May 2005
Messages
6,780
Visit site
I also reckon that, despite all the criticism, it was not a bad move to name him. If he is as good as he is supposed to be, he will be named again in the future, and teh experience of accompanying the squad this time, even if he didn't play, will be a huge bonus next time.
 
Top