maxi
Well-Known Member
Replaced my Volvo with a Beta & have just clocked up 1000 hours. Absolutely no regrets, cheaper to run, more robust & good product support.
Reading previous threads would suggest that Beta/Nanni are well thought of.
Very few of the Beta engine threads are anything to do with something that has actually 'broken'. Most heat exchanger threads are to do with the rate at which anodes decompose and the difficulty in removing the heat exchanger stack when it hasn't been touched for a few years.The impression I have got is that Beta are OK, but pretty cheaply done. There always seem to be threads about problems with heat exchangers, for example.
Very few of the Beta engine threads are anything to do with something that has actually 'broken'. ...).
My Nanni does not have anodes in the H /E but the replacement aluminium exhaust elbow does, the previous cast iron one didntVery few of the Beta engine threads are anything to do with something that has actually 'broken'. Most heat exchanger threads are to do with the rate at which anodes decompose and the difficulty in removing the heat exchanger stack when it hasn't been touched for a few years.
I remove and clean the heat exchanger stack every year and, to be honest, the only thing I usually find are bits of grass that have managed to get through both of my raw water strainers. I suspect if anyone bothered to look inside a Nanni exchanger stack they would find it very similar. It's just that Nanni don't suggest looking at it (I presume?).
Thought they all had the same basic hull.
The reality is that Beta is a tiny company, selling relatively few engines, so logically there will be far fewer threads on forums like this about Beta problems. This thread is titled "Volvo vs Beta", so it's worth looking at comparisons. Volvo Penta sales are about £600 million a year; Beta sales are about £8 million. Volvo Penta has 1400 employees; Beta has 38. That's how Volvo Penta can provide unrivalled aftersales support, and hence why so many boat manufacturers specify VP engines.
How about comparing like with like? Volvo as compared to Kubota is like comparing Beta to Volvo. Beta are simply licenced marinising agents just the same as Nanni.Kubota are the biggest diesel engine manufacturers in the world, hardly a two bit operation even if the successful Gloucester company are tiny compared to Volvo.
Yes, but you're not buying from Kubota, you're buying from Beta. And it's usually the marinising bits which give problems.
Agree on the first part ,but I have to say I am on my third Beta engine boat (two of which I fitted new, and the third which came with the boat)and have genuinely never had to do anything bar routine oil/filter/anode/belt type service.
Yes, but you're not buying from Kubota, you're buying from Beta. And it's usually the marinising bits which give problems.
The reality is that Beta is a tiny company, selling relatively few engines, so logically there will be far fewer threads on forums like this about Beta problems. This thread is titled "Volvo vs Beta", so it's worth looking at comparisons. Volvo Penta sales are about £600 million a year; Beta sales are about £8 million. Volvo Penta has 1400 employees; Beta has 38. That's how Volvo Penta can provide unrivalled aftersales support, and hence why so many boat manufacturers specify VP engines.
So how come their spares are so expensive? They should be able to get a lot of economies of scale.
I didn't have a problem with debris as such other than from the anode decaying, I had a proper strainer and nothing other than the general marine growth/slime that you'd expect on the salt water side of the stack. If the thing wasn't spotless then it'd overheat if pushed hard. It didn't do it at cruising revs (2500) but I like to be able to have full power available as when you need it there's going to be an important reason for it.
I actaully acid dipped the stack one year, made a very big difference and came out like new.