lustyd
Well-known member
in the galley rack, there was a bigger rack under the saloon table
They are very far apart and (seem to) work nicely for manoevring. Personally I think they'd be better moved forward to either side of the keel as well, and we may see this in future as twin motors become common.
I thought that as well - I wonder if the drives prevent them having the very trendy twin rudders of the fat arse generation boats due to the turbulence?
I don't think the base price includes a diesel system either though so it's not 70k extra. I've not seen the price list though, anyone know where it was?I would love a system like this boat has and it's great that some are brave enough to build a boat utilising electric motors.
There are up to 80 ft motor cats with a huge amount of solar panels that can motor under solar !
70k more though is way to much . Could buy a nice diesel equiped yacht for that money.
Its not a new development. The technology has been about for years. A boat builder friend of mine looked at it in depth several years ago for a new catamaran. The conclusion was it was not cost effective and it didn't provide any benefit. In the end he opted for diesel. Its great that you are excited. I am happy for you but its a gimmick in the real world.Oh it is capable of long distance, you're just ignoring everything about how it goes about that for some reason. You can do 8.3 days of constant motoring, these can do infinite days of motoring as long as you have some sailing or sunshine between those days. Your boat has a modern late generation diesel system while this has a first generation system. Onve your diesel is gone it's gone and you're stranded until you get more, when the battery drains on this it will recharge using the magic of nature. Your 8.3 days will be utter misery with noise and vibration....but you've probably already started typing your predictable response about why one specific use case that you absolutely must have will be the downfall of this whole technology. Meanwhile the rest of us are excited to see this advancement
On the video someone makes the point that from a regeneration point of view, the screws are better off out of the turbulence from the keel. There would be no disadvantage in twin rudders with this sort of set-up, as the screws are well forward of the rudders.
One of the big downsides of twin rudders has always been the loss of manoeuvrability due to lack of prop-wash on the rudders. With a twin prop system, manoeuvrability just isn't going to be an issue.
It's certainly niche right now, but then this seems to be the first yacht designed for the task. With the increased range and simplicity I imagine it will catch on. This would certainly be a good option for my sailing around the solent and channel.
If you were living off the hook for a few weeks you will still need the Solar installation. You need some way of putting back fridge/freezer loads, lighting etc. Who in their right mind would pay an additional £70k for a system with less flexibility unless you don't really go anywhere? It would be fine for day sailing and back to the marina at night.The boat comes with a yanmar engine as standard and this is included in the base price I quoted from the linked article. The €70k for electric is an extra on top of the base price. But I guess you save 10-15 on not having a thruster and maybe 2k on not needing solar - though without this you would not be able to stay on anchor for too long.
The keel is pretty slim and there would be limited volume for batteries there and appalling access should any checking be required. Plus there is a void where the engine would otherwise go in the standard configuration. Maybe when electric propulsion becomes commonplace the keel might be used?
I also wondered if one engine (or even a Watt&Sea pod) could be used for regeneration at reduced speed, but I'm not sure a single engine would get you to sufficient speed on its own.
This is certainly not the first boat to be designed for electric propulsion but it's the first I've seen at this entry-level price point.