Neeves
Well-known member
Is the Spade anchor patent still valid? Came out 20ish years ago.
Or Fortress, even older.
My interpretation is that manufacturers of anchors have already found 'ways' to design, manufacture and sell products that take advantage of some of the characteristics from both Spade (for example Rocna, Vulcan, Ultra Homepage | Ultra Marine Anchors and Epsilon) and Fortress (Manson's Racer and Lewmar's demountable aluminium anchor LFX LFX Anchor | Lewmar. Whatever patents were in force (if any) have not stopped advantage being taken of those 2 products. I don't know when Fortress was first introduced, it could have been as early as the late 1980s but certainly in the early 1990s and Spade I think early 1990s. Rocna was introduced in 2006, maybe 2005 and Manson's Racer (Racer Anchor - Manson Anchors NZ ) about 10 years ago.
The big disincentive to copying a Fortress are the cost of the dies for the aluminium extrusions and only a company like Lewmar has the combination of financial muscle and breadth of marketing to take advantage of the opportunity. Spade is horrendously expensive to make 'as is' and Rocna is a fair attempt at cutting those costs with Vulcan Vulcan - Rocna Anchors a much better interpretation (though I have never used a Vulcan - so I'm guessing ). Peter Smith's use of casting using the lost wax process and cheaper Chinese costs has changed the parameters for anchor production but unit costs are only competitive if you have large production runs. Making the moulds for casting, like the dies for aluminium extrusions, is expensive - which is a big deterrent for the gifted amateur. Most anchor developments have commonly been a 'sideline' or hobby, think CQR, Fortress, SARCA, Spade, Knox, Bruce.
Jonathan
Last edited: