Tranona
Well-known member
Exactly the point I was making. Many older boats had large overlapping sails because of the influence of IOR where the extra sail area was "free" and could be used to advantage. However it does not necessarily make a good cruising rg when, unlike hot shoe racers you don't have a range of headsails to work through as the wind increases. So you are stuck with one big sail that when reefed down is poor and when fully out is only of value in very light airs and well trimmed. some cruising boats from that era, like mine were designed with a "working" as the primary sail and a genoa for light airs, mainly offwind. The advent of furlers led many to have an overlapping genoa as the primary sail in the belief it would improve performance. In reality you quickly discover that it does not make much difference , particularly going to wind where it has a tendency to increase weather helm and is a PITA when tacking. Now with the developments in easily handled light airs off wind sails there is a lot to be said for reducing overlap from 135% to 115% for a "working" sail.If you race, you’re going to trim the sail, and reef it much later. Cruisers just don’t tend to set their overlappers well, and whatever the cut, and foam luff or not, they just don’t have the shape when heavily reefed. A 100% blade jib on the same furler can still be flat when half rolled. So you’re both right, IMHO. Racers just want the max area, but cruisers are often better off compromising.