Oddly, there don't seem to be any rules specifically about several thousands tons of marine hardware on a cricket pitch. However, Law 10.2(b), which deals with pitch sweeping, requires that the pitch shall be cleared of any debris at all intervals for meals, between innings and at the beginning of each day, not earlier than 30 minutes nor later than 10 minutes before the time scheduled or rescheduled for play to begin.
One hopes the salvage crew are acquainted with this provision. And have rather large brooms.
So, if a pilot was on board, and bearing in mind the AIS track, then mechanical failure could well be the cause.
I would say so. Came to port round the buoy and either they didnt come back to mid-ships or the rudder stuck at port.
Steering Gear Failure. Steering Gear Failure. Emergency tiller flat party close up at the rush
Ah thank you, looks like a job for 'new brooms' then
Oh justa thought, are wellingtons and thigh waders allowed on the pitch, might damage the surface?
Not sure what you are just saying, but there was a report that there was pilot on board at the time.
Me not knowing cricketing rules, what are the rules about a ship on the pitch then ?
You could treat it as an obstruction in the field (such as the tree was at Canterbury) which would require local rules to qualify what happens when the ball hits it.
I was unaware that there was a report that there was a pilot on board. At one stage last night the reports suggested crews of 17 to 27 and someone broke a leg. That, as usual, has been firmed up. Not the leg, the report.
My amusement was caused by a qualified no (quite correct as per my VTS link) and a definite yes (quite correct if the report its be believed).
As we can't even get the times of HW correct due to professional organisations giving different times it just amused me that two different answers were given to the same question. No offence intended or probably caused.
My amusement was caused by a qualified no (quite correct as per my VTS link)
The link you posted states clearly that the ship would require a pilot, unless the Master or First Mate possessed a PEC. So a "no" isn't necessarily "quite correct".
But if the master had a PEC than 'no' would have been the correct answer.
No reason why the captain of a car transporter couldn't have a PEC.
I'm pretty sure all the x-channel ferry captains have PEC's (and possibly fly a flag?)
How often does this skipper use Soton. I would suggest seldom
Key question seems to be ......
Is she listing because she grounded, or was she grounded because she was listing ?