philwebb
Member
Hi Dave, check on GUMTREE I’ve just seen a boom for sale on there.
You don’t need a specialist boom or tracks top and bottom for a stack pack cover. It still got a bolt rope on the foot of the sail the standard technique is a narrow strip of thinner material which fits into the top track with the bolt rope.Good thinking. It gets around the need to have a specialist boom extrusion, with track top and bottom. I tend to forget this, as my main is loose footed.
in 99% of the cases you don’t need a sail with foot boltrope altered - the strong but thin and shiny material used for the stackpack on these situations is easily fitted in. Tens, probably hundreds, of thousands of stackpacks installed using this method.Point A, if you’re clobbered by a cruiser boom with any weight in the wind, the prescence or absence of fittings won’t make much difference. Extra holes, fair enough if it bothers you. And all the tracks I’ve come across have been a quite tight enough fit already. Fair enough if you have the sail made or altered, but no material thin enough would be strong enough otherwise.
I guess it doesn't matter much if it never has to move. Do most people never change their clew tension?in 99% of the cases you don’t need a sail with foot boltrope altered - the strong but thin and shiny material used for the stackpack on these situations is easily fitted in. Tens, probably hundreds, of thousands of stackpacks installed using this method.
You can still adjust the clew with a stackpack fitted like that. not sure why you think you can'. As said, pretty standard setupI guess it doesn't matter much if it never has to move. Do most people never change their clew tension?
Not if it’s a tight fit you can’t. The after market ones I’ve seen fitted like that do not move well enough in my view. I would, personally, find an alternative method.You can still adjust the clew with a stackpack fitted like that. not sure why you think you can'. As said, pretty standard setup
Clearly a loose footed sail is better for clew adjustment. But the stackpack insert if done properly doesn’t cause any material issue.Not if it’s a tight fit you can’t. The after market ones I’ve seen fitted like that do not move well enough in my view. I would, personally, find an alternative method.
Lots of Hanse boats use the system. My boat has had it for the past 20 years & it has made things easy when rigging, at the start/end of the season, or when maintenance needed. It also allows easy adjustment when a sail is not loose fitted. I think that your comments are unfounded.You don’t need a specialist boom or tracks top and bottom for a stack pack cover. It still got a bolt rope on the foot of the sail the standard technique is a narrow strip of thinner material which fits into the top track with the bolt rope.
Personally I would absolutely NOT fit caravan awning tracks on the side of the boom as
(a) potentially extra danger of head injuries when boom and heads interact (in spite of all best efforts, when not if)
(b) extra work and extra holes in the boom
(c) entirely unnecessary, as thin cloth round bolt rope approach works perfectly
A sailcover is going to need slots for the lazy jacks & will involve hassle at the start & end of the day.The stac pack is not decided yet. We might opt for independent lazy jacks and a simple sail cover instead.
If I could buy a new boom extrusion for £151 I wouldHi Dave,
I’m shocked at the cost of a replacement! I guess that must include a new gooseneck assembly.
As daft as it sounds, the later Wayfarer section is fairly substantial and 3.2m long.
Selden 535-418-01 Boom Extr. 86/67-3200 Silver