Remake "Riddle of the Sands"!

Interested in a "Riddle of the Sands" remake?

  • Love it as a 4 part drama serial

    Votes: 29 49.2%
  • Love to see a new full length movie

    Votes: 18 30.5%
  • Frankly, not really bothered

    Votes: 17 28.8%

  • Total voters
    59

Seagreen

New member
Joined
30 Jul 2005
Messages
2,298
Location
Tied up away from the storm. Oh yes.
Visit site
IMHO I'm happy with the original, a new one would be all computer generated, and i dont think it would command the same sort of romanticism of the original film.

Ah, but there's the point about a serial. The film, great in some parts, was rubbish in a lot of others as the plot was horribly shrunk to fit the screen time. All the germans, especally Von Bruning, were cardboard baddies and all the subtlety was lost. All the fun of the exploration of the islands was rushed over in a montage, and little of the action sequences put in, where they could have used models and under cranked the camera, et., etc. And CGI used properly is fantastic.
 

lotusman

New member
Joined
17 Mar 2009
Messages
218
Visit site
Shadow in Sands

I would like to see 8 part mini series each episode of 2 hours including the continuation crafted by Sam Llewellyn
 

Twister_Ken

Well-known member
Joined
31 May 2001
Messages
27,585
Location
'ang on a mo, I'll just take some bearings
Visit site
I would like to see 8 part mini series each episode of 2 hours including the continuation crafted by Sam Llewellyn

Could it be Sam Davies instead?

davies.jpg




sam-llewellyn.jpg
 

ianat182

Well-known member
Joined
10 Jul 2008
Messages
2,688
Location
,home Portchester
Visit site
Asgard, the original, still exists and was undergoing restoration for museum display back in 2008. It was Asgard 2 that was wrecked. A couple of bob to charter......?!

All according to 'Classic Boats' of May 2011.

ianat182
 

Seagreen

New member
Joined
30 Jul 2005
Messages
2,298
Location
Tied up away from the storm. Oh yes.
Visit site
Asgard, the original, still exists and was undergoing restoration for museum display back in 2008. It was Asgard 2 that was wrecked. A couple of bob to charter......?!

All according to 'Classic Boats' of May 2011.

ianat182

I think the original was Childers' "Vixen" seen here just before being broken up Wooton creek; and also sailing.
 

lotusman

New member
Joined
17 Mar 2009
Messages
218
Visit site
There are very good articles in Yachting Monthly March 1979 and Classic Boat Summer 1987 describing Vixen on which Childers based Dulcibella. Reference is made to a cruise he undertook in the Frisian Islands and the Baltic in 1897 in Vixen which provided background for the book. Vixen was an ex-RNLI pulling sailing lifeboat in service as Thomas Chapman 1880 to 1889 and subsequently converted to a yacht by Joseph Price of Margate who made a practice of undertaking such conversions.

Vixen broke up after the second war.

The articles also describe the research that went into creating Dulcibella for the film, based on a similar ex-RNLI vessel Susan Ashley, although larger at 35' vs the 28' of the original.

the book 'The Riddle' by Maldwin Challis is recommended by the CB article.
 

lotusman

New member
Joined
17 Mar 2009
Messages
218
Visit site
I thought the book had her at 35' or thereabouts as well?

Pete

In the folio edition 1992, Carruthers describing Dulcibella on viewing her in daylight for the first time: "She seemed very small (in point of fact she was seven tons), something over thirty feet in length and nine in beam".

The drawing in the YM article, captioned "Dulcibella", roughly scaled, gives about 40' stem to stern, something just over 30' on the waterline. Looking at the photographs in the article, addition of a counter to the lifeboat during the conversion to yacht would have added a few feet behind the stern post of the lifeboat.

The illustration in CB of Vixen gives 28' from stem to sternpost and a further 3' to the end of the counter.

In the preface to the book, Maldwin Drummond says that Dulcibella was a combination of Vixen and a later yacht owned by Childers, Sunbeam.
 

prv

Well-known member
Joined
29 Nov 2009
Messages
37,363
Location
Southampton
Visit site
In the folio edition 1992, Carruthers describing Dulcibella on viewing her in daylight for the first time: "She seemed very small (in point of fact she was seven tons), something over thirty feet in length and nine in beam".

That's probably what I'm remembering, yes.

The illustration in CB of Vixen gives 28' from stem to sternpost

Sure - nothing says that the boat in the book has to be an exact copy of the author's own boat.

If they used a 35-footer for the film then that would seem to follow the book pretty closely.

Pete
 

Seagreen

New member
Joined
30 Jul 2005
Messages
2,298
Location
Tied up away from the storm. Oh yes.
Visit site
Wel, that would be about right for a lifeboat. Cold-moulded and doubleskinned (teak IIRC) with an added counter. No mention of whether she was pole masted or had a fidded topmast, though she did set a topsail. for that length, probably pole masted, though the pic of Vixen has a fidded topmast.
 

tr7v8

Active member
Joined
30 Nov 2001
Messages
1,270
Location
Kent
Visit site
Leave it alone

The original film & book were fantastic, I've never seen a remake that was better than the original.
Does the film industry have no imagination or ability that they can't come up with decent original ideas?
 

Seagreen

New member
Joined
30 Jul 2005
Messages
2,298
Location
Tied up away from the storm. Oh yes.
Visit site
The original film & book were fantastic, I've never seen a remake that was better than the original.
Does the film industry have no imagination or ability that they can't come up with decent original ideas?

Have to disagree with you there, as the film was a horrible travesty of the book. The film wsa well cast, at least in the main roles, but the story was butchered on screen. Hence the poll. so far, 50% want a serial, so that's sort of reassuring.
 

johnalison

Well-known member
Joined
14 Feb 2007
Messages
39,453
Location
Essex
Visit site
I agree. The film completely lacked atmosphere and the use of well-known actors was distracting. The book seems dated when read today but still makes an exciting read and is very descriptive of the area. When we left our boat in Norderney 20 years ago we caught the ferry to Nordeich and caught the train and could almost have used the times in the book. I would love to do the watt passage in fog but sadly it's usually against half a gale.

I would like to see the team that did Bleak House and Little Dorrit make a series as they were both atmospheric and didn't shy away from ambiguities.
 

rjp

Member
Joined
29 Apr 2004
Messages
462
Location
North Wales
Visit site
'Soured?' He made a choice, that was all. To the Irish he was a hero. One man's traitor is another man's freedom fighter after all and the Irish 'troubles' are water under the bridge for most people now. Anyway he was a great writer.

Has anyone read Sam Llewellyn's sequel 'In the shadow of the sands'. I really enjoyed that one too.
 

Seagreen

New member
Joined
30 Jul 2005
Messages
2,298
Location
Tied up away from the storm. Oh yes.
Visit site
Talking Childers over with some Irish friends, some of whom knew his son, it seems he "did it for the money", though greed (or financial desperation) was leavened with a bit of Republicanism.

I've read Shadow in the sands, but it didn't gel for me, with a whole cast of new characters. As a new tale it was fine, especially the daft ending, but what I really wanted was to find out what Davies, Clara and Carruthers did next. I suppose having blown the Kaiser's gaff at the end of Riddle, having new characters was the only option.
 

doug748

Well-known member
Joined
1 Oct 2002
Messages
12,923
Location
UK. South West.
Visit site
Talking Childers over with some Irish friends, some of whom knew his son, it seems he "did it for the money", though greed (or financial desperation) was leavened with a bit of Republicanism.

I am not so sure about the - bit of Republicanism.

In the final analysis the Irish shot him because he refused to compromise.


....PS, Yes I would like to see ROTS on the telly.
 
Last edited:

Colvic Watson

Well-known member
Joined
23 Nov 2004
Messages
10,862
Location
Norfolk
Visit site
I've read Shadow in the sands, but it didn't gel for me, with a whole cast of new characters. As a new tale it was fine, especially the daft ending, but what I really wanted was to find out what Davies, Clara and Carruthers did next. I suppose having blown the Kaiser's gaff at the end of Riddle, having new characters was the only option.

I thought it was a pretty poor book, though it did make me realise just how well written ROTS was. There is an excellent unabridged audio book version - despite reading the book a few times, the audiobook version of the passage in fog had me on the edge of my seat wondering how it would turn out, it's true, the pictures are better on the radio.
 
Top