"Yes but look at the cost difference."
________________________________
I agree they are expensive but I believe they are the best, giving fuel economy and/or increased speed, just because the pitch is always right. Going up and over large waves in a seaway is a bit like going up and down hill in your car, you wouldn’t do that without changing gear.
They should also be a great help going astern because they reduce prop walk and increase thrust astern. There is also the increase braking effect.
If there are others out there that have found problems with the Autoprop I for one, would be very interested to read about them.
I always worry about suppliers who refer to the shapes of their propellors as "Aerofoils".
They apparently lack the wit and technical education to understand that a marine propellor has a hydrofoil section 'cos "Aero" refers to things in air and "Hydro" refers to things in water.
I quote from Encyclopedia Brittanica
"shaped surface, such as an airplane wing, tail, or propeller blade, that produces lift and drag when moved through the air. An airfoil produces a lifting force that acts at right angles to the airstream and a dragging force that acts in the same direction as the airstream. "
and from Merriam Webster On-Line we get
" a body similar to an airfoil but designed for action in or on water " for the definition of a hydrofoil
Me? I'm perfectly happy with my conventional hydrofoil section folding prop with which my engine runs at 100% of manufacturer's specified rpm when at maximum displacement speed