Pas tout dans le jardin qui présente bien

Motor_Sailor

Well-Known Member
Joined
21 Jan 2017
Messages
2,046
Location
Norfolk
Visit site
Fancy that - not everything in the garden is rosy.

The wealthy tycoons and oligarchs enjoying summer on their luxury yachts in Saint-Tropez have been warned: cries of SOS, reports of fires, accidents or persons overboard may take a while to answer.

The French Riviera town’s lifeboat is out of action awaiting repairs while its volunteer crew accuse rich yacht captains of being too mean to stump up a few euros to pay for a replacement.

Resort Lifeboat officials said their ageing vessel, the Bailli de Suffren II, in service for more than 30 years, needed a spare part from Italy, and that it would not be putting to sea in the next two weeks.

The Société Nationale de Sauvetage en Mer (SNSM) at Saint-Tropez has ordered a new €1.4m lifeboat, which is now under construction in Brittany with a delivery date for next spring. But it needed another €200,000 to pay for it to be equipped with high-tech electronic devices and for its delivery, the society said.

The SNSM wrote this year to wealthy individuals and companies owning luxury yachts moored at Saint-Tropez, asking them to put their hands in their pockets. The town is a playground of the global super-rich.

Pierre-Yves Barasc, the president of the Saint-Tropez lifeboat station, said the appeal sank almost without trace. The owner of one modest boat sent a €10,000 donation but the tycoons and oligarchs failed to come up with a centime.

Barasc told the local edition of the news outlet Var-Martin: “They said it wasn’t their problem. That’s not true. On the bigger boats last year we saved an eight-month-old baby. We also saved three youngsters caught on rocks – not a word of thanks, even from their father. Nothing! It’s almost as if it’s their right. It’s great to shower the young ladies with a bottle of €50,000 Cristal champagne, but they could be a little more restrained and help us a little more.

“We asked all the owners of important boats. No reply, except one promise never kept. A lone boat, far from being the biggest, gave €10,000. If 30 people had done the same we could have had our new lifeboat quicker.”

Frédéric Saveuse, the deputy president of the Saint-Tropez lifeboat station, said: “We sent a personal letter to the 100 biggest businesses in the Var [department]. We sent another letter to the 10 richest French people, owners of both a vessel and a property here. In total we had two replies. It’s frustrating.”

Barasc said he hoped his “angry outburst” had made people realise that the lifeboat service needed donations. “We are run by volunteers and we have to find the money ourselves to run the service from A to Z. It’s not just saving people at sea, we get called to fires, evacuations, and we do training in schools and address pollution issues.

“We have wasted two years to change the lifeboat because we didn’t have the money and the result is our old boat broke down and is out of action for seven weeks. It’s distressing.”

Last year, the port’s lifeboat went out 87 times, and 78 of the rescues (90%) happened between 15 June and 15 September, the popular holiday season for the French Riviera. The immobilised lifeboat is the only vessel in the area capable of taking to sea in all conditions to pull in bigger vessels.

The SNSM said it had a semi-rigid boat and could call on neighbouring lifeboats in a serious emergency.

A member of the organisation said they had been looking at the UK’s Royal National Lifeboat Association for inspiration on how to raise funds.

Barsac said: “In France, only 3% of boat owners donate to the lifeboat service, unlike in the UK where I believe it is 85%. People don’t realise it’s different. Now my outburst seems to have woken up people and things are moving. Hopefully, now we will come up with the money for the new boat.”
The Guardian - 31 July
 
I expect Sybarite will be along soon to tell us this is all wrong (which of course it may be given the source!)
 
Yachting in Saint Tropez is all about conspicuous consumption. So if the SNSM should have a flag only available to donors of over a set amount. Then the super rich would want to flaunt their generosity - even though it is small change to them.
 
As I understand it, a charge is made for a call out, maybe that's why people are reluctant to put​ their hand in their pocket.

They charge for towing, not for saving lives.
Friend capsized his boat and had to be fished out. The boat was towed in by the Gendarmes de Mer (Water Police) But they refused any sort of payment, even to the widow's and orphan's fund.
 
Indeed. Despite its vast resources, the RNLI regularly demands that local communities find the money for new lifeboats or buildings.

Nothing to do with "demanding". It has always been like that. Just part of the fund raising strategy. It is an effective strategy to have local people engaged in fund raising where they can see "their" station benefiting directly from their efforts.
 
Nothing to do with "demanding". It has always been like that. Just part of the fund raising strategy. It is an effective strategy to have local people engaged in fund raising where they can see "their" station benefiting directly from their efforts.

OMG. ...don’t get sucked in to this !!!
 
Nothing to do with "demanding". It has always been like that. Just part of the fund raising strategy. It is an effective strategy to have local people engaged in fund raising where they can see "their" station benefiting directly from their efforts.

Nope, demanding. It is common practice for the RNLI to refuse to upgrade facilities unless local people come up with the money. Which is fine in places with many people, many of whom sail (like, say, Poole) but much harder when small coastal communities are being told to fund a new life boat house or else.
 
Nope, demanding. It is common practice for the RNLI to refuse to upgrade facilities unless local people come up with the money. Which is fine in places with many people, many of whom sail (like, say, Poole) but much harder when small coastal communities are being told to fund a new life boat house or else.

Perhaps you need to think a bit more about why this should be the case. Would guess it is not unconnected with there being some mechanism for prioritising the provision of services and the demand being greater than the funds available. Then inevitably there is a system of rationing that prioritises locations where the perceived need is greatest. Equally inevitably that will exclude some locations where locally there may be a local desire for facilities. Not unreasonable therefore that those asking for the facilities should also be asked to contribute directly.
 
Perhaps you need to think a bit more about why this should be the case. Would guess it is not unconnected with there being some mechanism for prioritising the provision of services and the demand being greater than the funds available. Then inevitably there is a system of rationing that prioritises locations where the perceived need is greatest. Equally inevitably that will exclude some locations where locally there may be a local desire for facilities. Not unreasonable therefore that those asking for the facilities should also be asked to contribute directly.

ROFL...!!!
 
Top