chewi
Active member
If i cant afford to pay cash for it i dont have it
+1, I won't borrow for toys.
If i cant afford to pay cash for it i dont have it
+1, I won't borrow for toys.
+1, I won't borrow for toys.
Has there actually been any further news on Northshore? According to the link at the start of the thread, the yard closed a week ago and the content of the link was prompted by the same tank manufacturer that was referenced in earlier threads on here. I'd have expected some announcement to have been made by now.
The thing is Guapa, some of the posts about only using cash or never spending more than a percentage of your worth on a boat come from people who are never wrong. About anything. Ever. I could spend ten years saving for the Kipper or buy her on credit and enjoy sailing her for those ten years, I may be wrong but some other people never are
Agree with that. Can't see anything inherently virtuous about not borrowing money. It is called consumer preference and some people value the use of the asset more highly than the money it costs. It also depends on where you are in your life cycle. If you have a secure income it is quite possible to enjoy something today and pay for it tomorrow. Later in life many people end up with substantial amounts of cash from savings made early in life and can make the decision to convert some cash into an asset they can enjoy. Others at that point have constrained incomes that are not likely to increase so would avoid borrowing.The thing is Guapa, some of the posts about only using cash or never spending more than a percentage of your worth on a boat come from people who are never wrong. About anything. Ever. I could spend ten years saving for the Kipper or buy her on credit and enjoy sailing her for those ten years, I may be wrong but some other people never are
most expensive toys are bought on loans - be that a campervan or boat - bicycle or motorbike - sure they're depreciating "assets" but that rather devalues the pleasure as well as the cost of the alternative.
If we all waited till we had the cash there would be a much smaller boating scene.
We are probably getting into the diminishing returns of a debate here. Suffice to say I agree that a client account run properly is good. I just don't think clients accounts as a whole are good enough - .
You're desperate. The business you built up is in trouble. All you need to do to tide you over is to "borrow" some money from the client account and you know you'll repay it next week.
Thats what happens. Often to solicitors. You are right - the client account is fine in theory and Tranona is right that its criminal to help yourself to client money. Doesnt stop it happening.
Depends how it's managed doesn't it? Some ppl max out cards and convert to loans with smaller payments the take out more cards - they are living beyond their means. Those of us with a bit more sense are quite capable of working out what we can and can't afford. At the end of the day if it comes to it, the boat could go - but it's not that likely.That rather sums up one of our major economic problems - a level of private debt that is the highest by some margin of all the big developed western economies. To quote Queen " I want it all , and I want it now!". Whatever happened to the idea of thrift, of saving for something, of living within your means?
That rather sums up one of our major economic problems - a level of private debt that is the highest by some margin of all the big developed western economies. To quote Queen " I want it all , and I want it now!". Whatever happened to the idea of thrift, of saving for something, of living within your means?
Except than when you look at the crooks that do dip into client accounts they are usually in a position where nobody checks systematically on what they are doing. Solicitors who steal usually target funds that belong to clients who do not hold them to account on a regular basis. They are also usually partners so the negative financial part of the wrongdoing falls on the partnership or their professional insurance.You're desperate. The business you built up is in trouble. All you need to do to tide you over is to "borrow" some money from the client account and you know you'll repay it next week.
Thats what happens. Often to solicitors. You are right - the client account is fine in theory and Tranona is right that its criminal to help yourself to client money. Doesnt stop it happening.
well I think some of you guys should apologise to the OP of the first thread
he was dead right
clearly the word was out on Friday to everybody but the people who might be just about to transfer money into the hands of the receivers for yachts they will never receive
it is what the web is for - it empowers ordinary people
well done solentboy
D
I'm with the Bosun. It just means adjusting expectations - no need to sacrifice the principle of boat ownership, just get a cheper or smaller one. Or build one by giving up something else if you really want one enough. I did all of that and I do not think my memories have any less merit than anybody else's.Depends how it's managed doesn't it? Some ppl max out cards and convert to loans with smaller payments the take out more cards - they are living beyond their means. Those of us with a bit more sense are quite capable of working out what we can and can't afford. At the end of the day if it comes to it, the boat could go - but it's not that likely.Bosun Higgs said:That rather sums up one of our major economic problems - a level of private debt that is the highest by some margin of all the big developed western economies. To quote Queen " I want it all , and I want it now!". Whatever happened to the idea of thrift, of saving for something, of living within your means