MAB V AWB

This AWB skipper nearly thought about taking his bimini down in 40 knots. I have noticed over the years how much difference it makes on the perception of sea state/danger/fear whether the sun is shinning or not.

Absolutely. Having spent many years coaching sailors in sunny places, strong winds don't seem half as bad.

My own school yacht was a Jenneau 36.2 and we zoomed around the Gib Straits a lot in heavy airs......sprayhood and bimini, what a difference too! Also good for 40 knots.
 
You would think so, since the IMOCAs use that set up, but look how massively different an IMOCA hull shape is and rudder length are compared to the same set up on a modern cruising boat. It's already been reported on this forum in the past about how terrible a Southerly 42RST handles down wind in a blow in Biscay. The wide arse design and shallow twin rudders did it no favours.
I had a long chat with a guy who sailed a Discovery with twin rudders across the pond last winter. He was scathing about the design and shallow rudders. He lost control of the boat numerous times under autopilot in following seas, simply because the shallow rudders left the water and the boat rounded up.
He would be sat at the nav station and spat out ending up in the galley across the boat.
Thr points made by Matt are valid even if you don't agree with them
The point about old IOR based boats downwind was demonstrated to mr outside my window on Saturday. I had the binoculars focussed on such a craft heading towards me on port tack, symmetric kite up. He chose that moment to gybe, and then do the thing that the type is renowned for. The main banged over, the kite filled on the new gybe, the boat spun, laid over, and remained there for about 40 seconds. If I hadn’t been worrying for any foredeck crew I might have been amused. That boat was once an AWB. Now it’s a dog with bad manners IMHO. You’d never give it a glance, even though it’s a ‘classic’. Not even classics are necessarily any good these days.
 
Not even classics are necessarily any good these days.
Boats now considered "classic" were never designed as such. David Sadler and Jeremy Rogers wanted a boat bigger than a Folkboat/Contessa 26 that would sail and rate well as those were characteristics their market wanted. The 32 was state of the art at the time following the S&S lead on design of the underwater bits and the rating rules with the huge genoa and tiny trim tab main. Hit the spot because there was nothing like it plus it gave entry into a strong social scene of like minded owners. Bit like the Stella and Twister had done on the east coast 10 years previously and the Sigma 33 later. Not to mention the Beneteau Firsts, Elans, Jeanneau Sunfasts and J boats in more recent times.

Such designs endure because of the numbers built and the strong support infrastructure.

Sorry, should also have included your X boat as this fits the same mould!
 
He studied yacht design at Southampton University, so it's fair to say he knows a thing ot two about yacht design.
The pedant in me feels obliged to point out that would have been at Southampton Solent University (or Southampton College of Technology as it probably still was when he went there).

Southampton University didn’t offer a degree course in Yacht Design; Ship Science or Nautical Studies were what was on the menu there back then.
 
Boats now considered "classic" were never designed as such. David Sadler and Jeremy Rogers wanted a boat bigger than a Folkboat/Contessa 26 that would sail and rate well as those were characteristics their market wanted. The 32 was state of the art at the time following the S&S lead on design of the underwater bits and the rating rules with the huge genoa and tiny trim tab main. Hit the spot because there was nothing like it plus it gave entry into a strong social scene of like minded owners. Bit like the Stella and Twister had done on the east coast 10 years previously and the Sigma 33 later. Not to mention the Beneteau Firsts, Elans, Jeanneau Sunfasts and J boats in more recent times.

Such designs endure because of the numbers built and the strong support infrastructure.

Sorry, should also have included your X boat as this fits the same mould!
A C32 still does the business though, a little cramped they may be compared to more modern designs. As do some other now classic designs. That is what makes those boats classics, you’d think. Some people seem to think anything older is a classc, a bit l8ke the classic car scene. Sometimes we need to separate historical interest from actual usability, particularly with boats, where you literally stake your life on the soundness of the design and structure in a way you don’t with cars. Is that IOR derived monster a worthwhile classic, or an old dog that should have gone to the crusher when it’s racing days were over?
 
A C32 still does the business though, a little cramped they may be compared to more modern designs. As do some other now classic designs. That is what makes those boats classics, you’d think. Some people seem to think anything older is a classc, a bit l8ke the classic car scene. Sometimes we need to separate historical interest from actual usability, particularly with boats, where you literally stake your life on the soundness of the design and structure in a way you don’t with cars. Is that IOR derived monster a worthwhile classic, or an old dog that should have gone to the crusher when it’s racing days were over?
It still does the business for what it was designed for. It holds its place now because of the numbers and support structures. No way is it comparable to modern boats because most are designed to a different brief. I mentioned some modern boats designed to a similar cruiser/racer brief that have achieved the same high level of acceptance and will at some time in the future be considered "classic".

The term "classic" means whatever you want it to mean so means different things to different people and eligible boats/cars/bikes etc are determined by the body controlling entry. For example the British Classic Yacht Club would not consider a boat such as the CO32. The racing scene in the Med and Antigua have their own definition of what is eligible for their classic regattas. This is no different from the old car scene where the term has been so overused that it is now meaningless.

I used the Mk2 Jaguar as an example in connection with the CO32 - not quite contemporary but shared many of the same characteristics and position in the social scene of the 60s and 70s. I used to drive one in the day and they were scary beasts if you tried to use the performance although quite good on the motorway if there was no crosswind. Drive one now and you appreciate how far things have moved on - much the same with boats. Jump from a CO32 to a similar size J boat or even a First and you are in different worlds.
 
I understand that, take a similar view. I don’t own one, have sailed them. I’m old enough to remember how awful cars used to be, too. The X is a classic by anyone’s measure, an extremely active race circuit with as high a level of competition as any class. We’re plagued by pros, have a glut of Olympic medallists. Quite apart from a 1909 design, and trad construction. As you say, the word is bandied about with abandon. MAB covers a lot of the boats rather better. I don’t necessarily exclude my own 20 year old tri from it
 
Very true. Well known that in 40kts of wind an AWB's keel will fall off, it's rudder be snapped like matchsticks and everyone on board will drown.

Any sailor who's seen 40kts in a AWB's never lived to tell the tail. 🙄

Except in the real world of course, when is strong winds the only boats going out of harbour are the sailing schools and charter boats trying to keep to their schedule - which are modern AWB.
And probably more keel and floor repairs needed to elderly British bilge keelers than the thousands of fin keel AWBs.
 
The pedant in me feels obliged to point out that would have been at Southampton Solent University (or Southampton College of Technology as it probably still was when he went there).

Southampton University didn’t offer a degree course in Yacht Design; Ship Science or Nautical Studies were what was on the menu there back then.
Aaah, East Park terrrace as many of us remember, although we ( as engineers) were annexed across the road. A few decades (Cough) later I went to Solent University for a ASTO conference, a little differrent to what I remembered.
 
Except in the real world of course, when is strong winds the only boats going out of harbour are the sailing schools and charter boats trying to keep to their schedule - which are modern AWB.
And probably more keel and floor repairs needed to elderly British bilge keelers than the thousands of fin keel AWBs.
That's a little unfair since a twin keel boat often takes the ground continually and fins don't on purpose. When they do it once, they often need repair. Bit of an apple and orange comparison
 
It still does the business for what it was designed for. It holds its place now because of the numbers and support structures. No way is it comparable to modern boats because most are designed to a different brief. I mentioned some modern boats designed to a similar cruiser/racer brief that have achieved the same high level of acceptance and will at some time in the future be considered "classic".

The term "classic" means whatever you want it to mean so means different things to different people and eligible boats/cars/bikes etc are determined by the body controlling entry. For example the British Classic Yacht Club would not consider a boat such as the CO32. The racing scene in the Med and Antigua have their own definition of what is eligible for their classic regattas. This is no different from the old car scene where the term has been so overused that it is now meaningless.

I used the Mk2 Jaguar as an example in connection with the CO32 - not quite contemporary but shared many of the same characteristics and position in the social scene of the 60s and 70s. I used to drive one in the day and they were scary beasts if you tried to use the performance although quite good on the motorway if there was no crosswind. Drive one now and you appreciate how far things have moved on - much the same with boats. Jump from a CO32 to a similar size J boat or even a First and you are in different worlds.
The problem with your use of the BCYC as a controlling body defining what is a classic is that it's just a private club. Note the entries to their regatta include many boats which are not club members. Perhaps use eligibility to Cowes classic week as a better yardstick?
 
I’m confused by this thread. 12 years ago when I bought my c.1983 designed, 2001 built Hanse I suggested on this forum it was a design transitional from MAB to AWB and I was told by someone or other it was decidedly an AWB whether I liked it or not. Thing is, in those years, the 10yr old boat I bought has seamlessly become a 22 year old boat despite me lavishing every care and attention on her and- although I think she is still in top seaworthy condition- the knowledge that she actually is 22 years old and represents a 40 year old design keeps creeping up on me. Is she a perfectly kept MAB or a dated if well found AWB?
 
The problem with your use of the BCYC as a controlling body defining what is a classic is that it's just a private club. Note the entries to their regatta include many boats which are not club members. Perhaps use eligibility to Cowes classic week as a better yardstick?
Yes in that they are more relaxed about what they consider "classic" and also recognise "spirit of tradition" but the principle remains the same. Those bodies whether they be clubs, organisers of regattas, auctioneers who use these terms to define what they are attracting to their activities control what they accept as meeting those terms.
 
If I remember correctly, the MAB v AWB was a throw away comment by a yachting journalist. Several decades on we are now trying to define what each should be. As I have already contributed to this debate and there is such a vast number of descriptions - none of which give a definitive answer. I will no longer contribute to this thread as there is no answer. So, please continue this never ending discussion without me.
 
As the original OP, who posed the question, I find the comments interesting. More so as after 95 posts, we have managed not to get into a slanging match (yet), which must be a first.
However, having followed the thread with interest, I cannot help feeling that I am no nearer the answer.
But I do think that, externally, my AWB looks a lot better than a lot of the designs ( similar size) that one might class as MABs. For that matter, a lot of the much newer AWBs, whose designers seem to have lost the plot, in boat design, as they try to make the final product "different". This, presumably, being to help the manufacturer compete in global sales.
As for the the internals; they are equal, if not superior to, any of the similar length earlier (I will not say MABs) designs, that I have seen.
:D :unsure::rolleyes:
 
How old does an AWB have to be before it becomes a MAB?

Old enough that it no longer blends in with the all the other newish boats that look pretty much the same as it and each other in a typical marina.

& what is the defining difference?
Owner(s) have cared about it enough for it to have survived, as it's contemporaries have depreciated into a skip. There could be a variety of reasons for this, as described in this thread- an appealing compromise of seaworthiness, build quality & accommodation? A racing fleet? A cult following? A single oddball owner? Luck?
 
If I remember correctly, the MAB v AWB was a throw away comment by a yachting journalist. Several decades on we are now trying to define what each should be. As I have already contributed to this debate and there is such a vast number of descriptions - none of which give a definitive answer. I will no longer contribute to this thread as there is no answer. So, please continue this never ending discussion without me.

The well known American chat show host, classic vehicle collector and great motorcyclist Jay Leno was once asked "What is your favorite motorbike?"

He reflected a moment before replying "The one I am riding when asked that question!"

Ergo, all motorbikes are good, certainly better than not having one.

Ditto boats. First mate and I are fortunate in having a very nice vessel. The sunset we see in in a secluded bay is the same as the one seen by the impecunious teenagers in a fifty quid Fletcher speedboat with a wonky outboard.

55 years ago, that WAS us.........................................
 
. . . Thing is, in those years, the 10yr old boat I bought has seamlessly become a 22 year old boat despite me lavishing every care and attention on her and- although I think she is still in top seaworthy condition- the knowledge that she actually is 22 years old and represents a 40 year old design keeps creeping up on me. Is she a perfectly kept MAB or a dated if well found AWB?

There is no definitive distinction between a MAB and an AWB, and a search for one, or claim of one, is misguided.

Remember, the whole point of the MAB & AWB terminology is a gentle ribbing from the other camp about the perceived/putative shortcomings of your boat type, regardless of its actual merits, and the more you value your own boat (for whatever qualities) the more effective the ribbing.

It doesn't actually matter whether the person ribbing you considers your boat a MAB or an AWB - you're damned either way! :D
 
The test is, when people walk by one's yacht, do they turn and look at it (admiringly).

Even when the varnish is peeling off, the deck needs painting, the fenders are grubby. the crew look like down-and-outs (no prizes for guessing which boat might I be thinking of? :oops:) do they say, as they often do to me in Brittany, "Un très joli bateau, monsieur".
 
Last edited:
Top