MAB V AWB

lustyd

Well-known member
Joined
27 Jul 2010
Messages
12,405
Visit site
I have a MOB - modernised old boat. My Fulmar is 43 years old and can still attract a lot of attention from sailors and non-sailors alike. However compared to most other yachts of a similar age, Concerto seems to sparkle.
I’ve got to say the Fulmar is just an AWB, albeit quite an old one. No different to a Jeanneau of the era
 

Poignard

Well-known member
Joined
23 Jul 2005
Messages
53,018
Location
South London
Visit site
Triy sailing all over the place down the River Crouch, The Orwell, or the Black Deep when the wind is up the chuff.:rolleyes:
Is the "Holman Roll" likely to manifest itself in such circumstances?

And if it did, the short time you would have to endure it, hardly seems to justify refusing to own one of Holman's designs.
 
Last edited:

Daydream believer

Well-known member
Joined
6 Oct 2012
Messages
20,971
Location
Southminster, essex
Visit site
Is the "Holman Roll" likely to manifest itself in such circumstances?

And if it did, the short time you would have to endure it, hardly seems to justify refusing to own one of Holman's designs.
Nothing to do with refusing to have a Holman design. You are miss quoting. The statement was made that older designs were more stable down wind than modern AWBs. I would suggest that is a fallacy & present examples to back up my opinion.

I rolled my Stella in & out of the Crouch for 10 years & I rolled the Bowman in & out a few times as well. As for the UFO 34, I crewed for 5-6 years , that was almost every EAORA race & week club racing. I hardly ever recall tacking down wind. It was too much hassle twin pole gybing the kite anyway.

The Bowman was an expensive boat. At the time the owner told me that his boat cost him £80,000. It was done as a commercial enterprise, where he financed the moulds & leased them to the builder per boat built. That made his cost less than it should be to other owners. At the time that was the equivalent as much later Oysters, HRs etc. would be, speaking in relative terms.
 
Last edited:

Concerto

Well-known member
Joined
16 Jul 2014
Messages
6,152
Location
Chatham Maritime Marina
Visit site
What you have there is a very smart MAB!

The test is to see it though the eyes of the putative detractor. Polish it all you like, but it's never going to make it an AWB. (Thank goodness!)

Hang on to it long enough, and it becomes a classic, but still a MAB!
I do not want an AWB as I dislike the design of the hull shape and building methods. I am saying this not due to lack of funds as I could have bought a brand new fully equipped 32ft AWB when I bought my Fulmar. I chose what I felt what I felt was right for me and have then changed and improved things to get it right for me to sail singlehanded. She is almost back to a new condition and has cost only a third of what a new AWB would have cost.

The Fulmar is certainly a classic yacht. A few other classics with a racing pedigree could include the Twister, Contessa 32, S&S 34 and Sigma 33. Others yachts I feel could be included are Hustler 30, UFO 34 and Hustler 35.
 

Concerto

Well-known member
Joined
16 Jul 2014
Messages
6,152
Location
Chatham Maritime Marina
Visit site
Sigma 33 is clearly an AWB on hull volume alone, albeit a transition case as the interior layout is stodgily old fashioned.
Last year I had a sailor on board who had recently sold a Sigma 33. He was surprised at the greater interior volume the Fulmar had compared to his old Sigma, but on a slightly shorter hull.
 

steve yates

Well-known member
Joined
16 Oct 2014
Messages
3,860
Location
Benfleet, Essex/Keswick, Cumbria
Visit site
One boat-- the cost (relatively) 3 times the price. Marvelous comparison. :rolleyes:
I cant see how price relates to the motion of a boat at sea. Surely that is purely a function of design?
I imagine there will be both cheap and expensive seakindly boats and both cheap and expensive boats that are are horrible in a seaway.
 

Poignard

Well-known member
Joined
23 Jul 2005
Messages
53,018
Location
South London
Visit site
The suggestion was that one could solve rolling by doing a zig zag course:rolleyes:
I was just pointing out - by example- that was not always possible. Try & keep up
And the suggestion I made was that where that was not practicable because one was in a narrow channel, any rolling that did occur would not have to be put up with for very long.
 

Concerto

Well-known member
Joined
16 Jul 2014
Messages
6,152
Location
Chatham Maritime Marina
Visit site
I’ve got to say the Fulmar is just an AWB, albeit quite an old one. No different to a Jeanneau of the era
You are the first to say that, but I am not sure I agree. There is just no exact definition as to when AWB started or what features makes them one. Yacht design has been evolving since the late 1950's. The long keel narrow beam yachts with a 50% ballast ratio have changed to: separate keel and rudder, increased beam and reduced ballast radio. Also the change was partially due to the change from RORC to IOR racing rule, which also changed the position of the mast and reduced the genoa size and increased the very short foot of the mainsail. The next major change was the change of how boats were constructed in mass production factories and then the introduction of EU Recreational Craft Directive. So what defines an AWB?
 
Last edited:

penfold

Well-known member
Joined
25 Aug 2003
Messages
7,729
Location
On the Clyde
Visit site
A few extra inches of freeboard and a roomier coachroof, plus arguably more considered layout of joinery. It doesn't take much.
Last year I had a sailor on board who had recently sold a Sigma 33. He was surprised at the greater interior volume the Fulmar had compared to his old Sigma, but on a slightly shorter hull.
 

Concerto

Well-known member
Joined
16 Jul 2014
Messages
6,152
Location
Chatham Maritime Marina
Visit site
A few extra inches of freeboard and a roomier coachroof, plus arguably more considered layout of joinery. It doesn't take much.
I do not believe there is any difference in freeboard height. There is about 4 inches of extra beam and the transom is slightly wider.
SIGMA 33 OOD - sailboatdata
FULMAR 32 (WESTERLY) - sailboatdata

This photo shows a Sigma 33 and my Fulmar and there does not look to be any difference in freeboard height.

IMG_5262 cropped.jpg
 

flaming

Well-known member
Joined
24 Mar 2004
Messages
15,874
Visit site
That wasn't me. That was a yacht designer and participant in the 1979 race. Read the post again.
Th big Hanse that had catastrophic steering failure a couple of years ago on the ARC, their crew were picked up by an Oyster 55. They commented on how great the Oyster felt compared to the Hanse in rough weather.
I wasn’t aware that Matt Sheehan. Was a yacht designer. I thought he was a sailing journalist. What boats has he designed?

The weird thing about this AWB/ MAB debate is that if you just read this forum you’d assume that you could make a fortune from designing and building “traditional looking” cruising boats. As clearly there must be a massive market just fed up of the AWBs. But in fact just about everyone who tries it goes bust.
 

Bobc

Well-known member
Joined
20 Jan 2011
Messages
10,172
Visit site
You are the first to say that, but I am not sure I agree. There is just no exact definition as to when AWB started or what features makes them one. Yacht design has been evolving since the late 1950's. The long keel narrow beam yachts with a 50% ballast ratio have changed to: separate keel and rudder, increased beam and reduced ballast radio. Also the change was partially due to the change from RORC to IOR racing rule, which also changed the position of the mast and reduced the genoa size and increased the very short foot of the mainsail. The next major change was the change of how boats were constructed in mass production factories and then the introduction of EU Recreational Craft Directive. So what defines an AWB?
I'd say that the Fulmar was an AWB in its day. No question.

It was a production boat from a high volume manufacturer.
 
Top