Dellquay13
Well-known member
Ok, forgiving the Rabbie Burnsian language, I guess nobody wants to get confused with MOBAWB = Average White Boat
MAB = Manky Auld Boat
Ok, forgiving the Rabbie Burnsian language, I guess nobody wants to get confused with MOBAWB = Average White Boat
MAB = Manky Auld Boat
I’ve got to say the Fulmar is just an AWB, albeit quite an old one. No different to a Jeanneau of the eraI have a MOB - modernised old boat. My Fulmar is 43 years old and can still attract a lot of attention from sailors and non-sailors alike. However compared to most other yachts of a similar age, Concerto seems to sparkle.
Is the "Holman Roll" likely to manifest itself in such circumstances?Triy sailing all over the place down the River Crouch, The Orwell, or the Black Deep when the wind is up the chuff.
Nothing to do with refusing to have a Holman design. You are miss quoting. The statement was made that older designs were more stable down wind than modern AWBs. I would suggest that is a fallacy & present examples to back up my opinion.Is the "Holman Roll" likely to manifest itself in such circumstances?
And if it did, the short time you would have to endure it, hardly seems to justify refusing to own one of Holman's designs.
Not exactly Atlantic rollers or breaking waves your talking about thenTriy sailing all over the place down the River Crouch, The Orwell, or the Black Deep when the wind is up the chuff.
Nothing wrong with Jeanneaus from that era either. The Melody was a pretty good boatI’ve got to say the Fulmar is just an AWB, albeit quite an old one. No different to a Jeanneau of the era
The suggestion was that one could solve rolling by doing a zig zag courseNot exactly Atlantic rollers or breaking waves your talking about then
I do not want an AWB as I dislike the design of the hull shape and building methods. I am saying this not due to lack of funds as I could have bought a brand new fully equipped 32ft AWB when I bought my Fulmar. I chose what I felt what I felt was right for me and have then changed and improved things to get it right for me to sail singlehanded. She is almost back to a new condition and has cost only a third of what a new AWB would have cost.What you have there is a very smart MAB!
The test is to see it though the eyes of the putative detractor. Polish it all you like, but it's never going to make it an AWB. (Thank goodness!)
Hang on to it long enough, and it becomes a classic, but still a MAB!
Last year I had a sailor on board who had recently sold a Sigma 33. He was surprised at the greater interior volume the Fulmar had compared to his old Sigma, but on a slightly shorter hull.Sigma 33 is clearly an AWB on hull volume alone, albeit a transition case as the interior layout is stodgily old fashioned.
I cant see how price relates to the motion of a boat at sea. Surely that is purely a function of design?One boat-- the cost (relatively) 3 times the price. Marvelous comparison.
And the suggestion I made was that where that was not practicable because one was in a narrow channel, any rolling that did occur would not have to be put up with for very long.The suggestion was that one could solve rolling by doing a zig zag course
I was just pointing out - by example- that was not always possible. Try & keep up
You are the first to say that, but I am not sure I agree. There is just no exact definition as to when AWB started or what features makes them one. Yacht design has been evolving since the late 1950's. The long keel narrow beam yachts with a 50% ballast ratio have changed to: separate keel and rudder, increased beam and reduced ballast radio. Also the change was partially due to the change from RORC to IOR racing rule, which also changed the position of the mast and reduced the genoa size and increased the very short foot of the mainsail. The next major change was the change of how boats were constructed in mass production factories and then the introduction of EU Recreational Craft Directive. So what defines an AWB?I’ve got to say the Fulmar is just an AWB, albeit quite an old one. No different to a Jeanneau of the era
Last year I had a sailor on board who had recently sold a Sigma 33. He was surprised at the greater interior volume the Fulmar had compared to his old Sigma, but on a slightly shorter hull.
I do not believe there is any difference in freeboard height. There is about 4 inches of extra beam and the transom is slightly wider.A few extra inches of freeboard and a roomier coachroof, plus arguably more considered layout of joinery. It doesn't take much.
I wasn’t aware that Matt Sheehan. Was a yacht designer. I thought he was a sailing journalist. What boats has he designed?That wasn't me. That was a yacht designer and participant in the 1979 race. Read the post again.
Th big Hanse that had catastrophic steering failure a couple of years ago on the ARC, their crew were picked up by an Oyster 55. They commented on how great the Oyster felt compared to the Hanse in rough weather.
I'd say that the Fulmar was an AWB in its day. No question.You are the first to say that, but I am not sure I agree. There is just no exact definition as to when AWB started or what features makes them one. Yacht design has been evolving since the late 1950's. The long keel narrow beam yachts with a 50% ballast ratio have changed to: separate keel and rudder, increased beam and reduced ballast radio. Also the change was partially due to the change from RORC to IOR racing rule, which also changed the position of the mast and reduced the genoa size and increased the very short foot of the mainsail. The next major change was the change of how boats were constructed in mass production factories and then the introduction of EU Recreational Craft Directive. So what defines an AWB?
Go on then, I'll bite.To us multihullers, MAB or AWB is simply another MOC