RichardS
N/A
Those must be mighty big camshafts if it takes 300 bhp to drive them ....what output is the engine?
Take a guess.
(Clue ..... it's not the engine in post #13)
Richard
Those must be mighty big camshafts if it takes 300 bhp to drive them ....what output is the engine?
Take a guess.
(Clue ..... it's not the engine in post #13)
Richard
The normal prop-shaft tapers of ~1:10 are rather steep for good drive characteristics, more of a location taper. Industrial drive tapers such as the Morse series are nearer 1:20. Also, a taper is not entirely reliable when the axial load is reversed when going astern, the nut has to be really tight.
Think you are missing the point here.
I've not watched the video ..... but can't you lap it in for a few minutes with fine valve grinding paste. If it's anything like engine valves after a few minutes you will see from the colour whether there is a problem or not and can carry on lapping until it looks right.
I lapped these valves in at the weekend and then poured in white spirit:
![]()
Richard
Must be a new design where the clutch/gearbox is driven off both camshafts ....sounds exciting.Think you are missing the point here. If the cams need 300 hp to turn them, then the total out put of the motor must be well in excess of that. The fact is that if the engine is producing 300 hp then it does not transmit 300 hp to rotate the cams.
Not so. For a key of normal proportions, for a given torque, the shear-stress in a key is of similar order of magnitude to the maximum shear stress in the shaft, ( ie at the surface). The key should be able to carry the shaft torque without assistance from frictional grip of the taper.The key is mostly there to avoid spinning the taper and ruining it during assembly. The key is not able to transmit very much torque on its own.
Must be a new design where the clutch/gearbox is driven off both camshafts ....sounds exciting.
Well a fair proportion will be going to accelerate the crankshaft, pistons and flywheel and/or torque converter.
Although, compared to the valve springs, those are all trivial loads. The engine can be turned over with one hand on the crank pulley once the cams are removed .... but once those 32 springs are in place it's a struggle to turn it over even with a 12 inch spanner. :ambivalence:
Or one could be in neutral and blipping the throttle. Where do you think all those horses and torques are going then?
Not so. For a key of normal proportions, for a given torque, the shear-stress in a key is of similar order of magnitude to the maximum shear stress in the shaft, ( ie at the surface). The key should be able to carry the shaft torque without assistance from frictional grip of the taper.
I wouldn't be happy with a prop fitted without a key.
Whilst not exactly comparing apples with oranges, the vast majority of modern industrial rotating equipment such as pumps, compressors and turbines does not use keys and keyways. There is a long history of fatigue failures initiated at keyways. The equipment I have worked on, anything from pumps of 4-5 MW up to large gas turbines producing 90 MW, universally have tapered connections to their drives or driven equipment. The large ones are hydraulically applied, smaller ones with various bolted arrangements.
Whilst not exactly comparing apples with oranges, the vast majority of modern industrial rotating equipment such as pumps, compressors and turbines does not use keys and keyways. There is a long history of fatigue failures initiated at keyways. The equipment I have worked on, anything from pumps of 4-5 MW up to large gas turbines producing 90 MW, universally have tapered connections to their drives or driven equipment. The large ones are hydraulically applied, smaller ones with various bolted arrangements.
Fairly obviously, a parallel shaft at the engine end is convenient to use with a clamped-up split coupling. Which alloows for a little length adjustment. A similar split coupling at the prop end would be a poor solution for the hydrodynamics of the prop.....
Also why id the motor coupling end of a boat prop shaft parallel and not tapered like the prop. It is subject to the same forces as the prop and if it became disconnected would be of a greater problem than just loosing the prop.
....]
Vyv I agree with that as a mechanical design but when I was designing mechanical equipment of a more modest power usage parallel and tapers keys were the norm and not even using tapered shafts.
The springs give back much of the power applied to them. If they didn't, you'd be tripping over desmodromic engines in every race paddock.
Blipping the throttle won't give full power, or anything like it, unless applied against a sufficient load.
Richard S - please stop digging!