Insuring boats in EU

julians

Well-known member
Joined
11 Jun 2006
Messages
2,630
Visit site
The OP wasn't asking about a British flagged boat though: "Apparently any UK insurer/broker who insures an EU flagged boat in Europe now needs an office in Europe"
He was referring to his boat in the original post - which is British flagged. The flag of the boat has nothing to do with where IVA was paid or not paid

Suspect there is a misunderstanding somewhere,unless the boat is actually registered not in the UK ,or maybe the op
is no longer a UK resident?
 

TonyR123

Active member
Joined
20 Feb 2016
Messages
499
Location
Puerto Portals
Visit site
It most definitely has the SSR and still a UK resident (and I expect I always will be). I think some misunderstanding (from me as well when I was informed) and I expect the IVA paid in Mallorca has caused the mis-understanding.
 

jfm

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
23,885
Location
Jersey/Antibes
Visit site
Crikey, what a thread. This is very complex, and this thread has done sterling work to make it even more confusing than it need be :).

On insurance (nothing to do with VAT), it is generally the case that an insurer covering EU located risks must be regulated/have an office in the EU. The location of a risk is complex topic but for a boat it is where flagged. Nothing to do with VAT etc. For a person wanting holiday insurance, it is where that person normally lives, to answer the first sentence of julians' post 19.

On VAT, a completely separate topic from insurance, Tranona is 100% correct and several others are incorrect. People (except Tranona!) are conflating 2 separate things:

  1. Boats on which UK VAT was originally paid, or which were at some point in their pre-Brexit lives physically in the UK while VAT paid in UK or anywhere else in the EU, and that were exported from UK to EU, then brought back to UK by the same owner who was the original exporter - for this so called "RGR" relief there is no longer a 3 year limit or other Brexit related deadline by which the boat must be returned to UK without paying UK VAT a second time. Tranona is 100% correct that the previous "discretionary" extension of the 3 year time limit has become "automatic". Tranona is also correct on his "duality" point, which is a point that virtually no other public commentators on the planet (yachting magazines and associations, and forum posters) have ever got correct. I think Tranona has described this duality before on here, and I certainly have, somewhat to no avail!

  2. Boats (not in #1 above) that are EU (not UK) VAT paid being brought into the UK - for this situation there is a Brexit deadline time limit and that is what all the RYA and CA kerfuffle has been about, but they tend not to make clear that the kerfuffle applies only to this "para 2" situation and not to para 1 above.

In my book the RYA and others associations have done a terrible job communicating this (and I've criticised them before on here). Don't believe everything you read on the internet (apart from Tranona's posts and this post :) ) because this is such an easily confused topic that many writers get it wrong. The two articles posted in images above in this thread are pretty poor, tbh. There are plenty of incorrect statements on RYA's website over the years - do not assume RYA is a source of truth on this. I'm posting from a position of reading and knowing how to read the actual law, not regurgitating the internet.
 
Last edited:

Hurricane

Well-known member
Joined
11 Nov 2005
Messages
9,587
Location
Sant Carles de la Ràpita
Visit site
Crikey, what a thread. This is very complex, and this thread has done sterling work to make it even more confusing than it need be :).

On insurance (nothing to do with VAT), it is generally the case that an insurer covering EU located risks must be regulated/have an office in the EU. The location of a risk is complex topic but for a boat it is where flagged. Nothing to do with VAT etc. For a person wanting holiday insurance, it is where that person normally lives, to answer the first sentence of julians' post 19.

On VAT, a completely separate topic from insurance, Tranona is 100% correct and several others are incorrect. People (except Tranona!) are conflating 2 separate things:

  1. Boats on which UK VAT was originally paid, that were exported from UK to EU, then brought back to UK by the same owner who was the original exporter - for this so called "RGR" relief there is no longer a 3 year limit or other Brexit related deadline by which the boat must be returned to UK without paying UK VAT a second time. Tranona is 100% correct that the previous "discretionary" extension of the 3 year time limit has become "automatic". Tranona is also correct on his "duality" point, which is a point that virtually no other public commentators on the planet (yachting magazines and associations, and forum posters) have ever got correct. I think Tranona has described this duality before on here, and I certainly have, somewhat to no avail!

  2. Boats that are EU (not UK) VAT paid being brought into the UK - for this situation there is a Brexit deadline time limit and that is what all the RYA and CA kerfuffle has been about, but they tend not to make clear that the kerfuffle applies only to this "para 2" situation and not to para 1 above.

In my book the RYA and others associations have done a terrible job communicating this (and I've criticised them before on here). Don't believe everything you read on the internet (apart from Tranona's posts and this post :) ) because this is such an easily confused topic that many writers get it wrong. The two articles posted in images above in this thread are pretty poor, tbh. There are plenty of incorrect statements on RYA's website over the years - do not assume RYA is a source of truth on this. I'm posting from a position of reading and knowing how to read the actual law, not regurgitating the internet.
Thanks for clearing that up.
I was somewhat surprised when I read those two articles that I had to share them.
They just don't make sense.
Your short answer is concise and clear.
Thanks
 

Portofino

Well-known member
Joined
10 Apr 2011
Messages
12,293
Location
Boat- Western Med
Visit site
The OP wasn't asking about a British flagged boat though: "Apparently any UK insurer/broker who insures an EU flagged boat in Europe now needs an office in Europe"
Just to grease this wheel .The U.K. brokers tend to act for ins Co with offices ( not exclusively) in the EU .
Eg Zurich anyhow .

Those businesses pre bexit with zero physical presence in the EU who did masses of trade pre brexit with / in the EU , post bexit simply established a satellite office eg in Dublin .Two staff to spin business out from the original U.K. office .
 

jfm

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
23,885
Location
Jersey/Antibes
Visit site
Those businesses pre bexit with zero physical presence in the EU who did masses of trade pre brexit with / in the EU , post bexit simply established a satellite office eg in Dublin .Two staff to spin business out from the original U.K. office .
Sheesh - every word of that is incorrect, on multiple levels.
You have no experience of running/owning financial services businesses in/out of EU both before/after Brexit; I do it every day. It's best not to post if you have no clue - I post nothing about dentistry, for example.
 

DownWest

Well-known member
Joined
25 Dec 2007
Messages
13,835
Location
S.W. France
Visit site
To avoid some local hassles, I tried GJW in the last week to insure my little home built sailing cruiser. They replied that they would only insure it if it was UK flagged. Since I am resident in France, no SSR. So, I contacted Pantaenius and they said OK, but only 3rd party and personal cover. That gets me past the French requirement for insurance. Fee was OK too.
DW

I don't post on dentistry either, even though I actually did some on my dentist :)
 

Portofino

Well-known member
Joined
10 Apr 2011
Messages
12,293
Location
Boat- Western Med
Visit site
Sheesh - every word of that is incorrect, on multiple levels.
You have no experience of running/owning financial services businesses in/out of EU both before/after Brexit; I do it every day. It's best not to post if you have no clue - I post nothing about dentistry, for example.
Son has it what they did successfully.Dublin + Amsterdam. All the decisions are taken and movers and shakers are in London .
 

jfm

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
23,885
Location
Jersey/Antibes
Visit site
  1. Boats on which UK VAT was originally paid, or which were at some point in their pre-Brexit lives physically in the UK while VAT paid in UK or anywhere else in the EU, and that were exported from UK to EU, then brought back to UK by the same owner who was the original exporter - for this so called "RGR" relief there is no longer a 3 year limit or other Brexit related deadline by which the boat must be returned to UK without paying UK VAT a second time. Tranona is 100% correct that the previous "discretionary" extension of the 3 year time limit has become "automatic". Tranona is also correct on his "duality" point, which is a point that virtually no other public commentators on the planet (yachting magazines and associations, and forum posters) have ever got correct. I think Tranona has described this duality before on here, and I certainly have, somewhat to no avail!

  2. Boats (not in #1 above) that are EU (not UK) VAT paid being brought into the UK - for this situation there is a Brexit deadline time limit and that is what all the RYA and CA kerfuffle has been about, but they tend not to make clear that the kerfuffle applies only to this "para 2" situation and not to para 1 above.
On reading my own post again, I want to add an edit - I'm not correcting anything I wrote; I'm just adding another (rare) category of boats that can be brought back to UK with RGR without any time limit.
 

jfm

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
23,885
Location
Jersey/Antibes
Visit site
Son has it what they did successfully.Dublin + Amsterdam. All the decisions are taken and movers and shakers are in London .
As you wish. If your son has tons more experience at owning/running financial services businesses than me, I'll happily concede.

His employer (or he, if he owns the business) might not appreciate your last sentence being posted on public internet though, because you're basically accusing them of breaking the law. Post away though... 🍿🍿
 

47GC

Active member
Joined
27 May 2015
Messages
192
Location
Loch Lomond, Scotland.
Visit site
I trust what @jfm says. Over the years reading here, his posts are always accurate, anyways he’s got the biggest boat so he’s boss. End of! To be honest I’m ignoring and scrolling past the Portofino posts from now on in. They just detract from this otherwise great post. Sorry Porto!
 

Portofino

Well-known member
Joined
10 Apr 2011
Messages
12,293
Location
Boat- Western Med
Visit site
As you wish. If your son has tons more experience at owning/running financial services businesses than me, I'll happily concede.

His employer (or he, if he owns the business) might not appreciate your last sentence being posted on public internet though, because you're basically accusing them of breaking the law. Post away though... 🍿🍿
Talking crossed purposes here .
Ironically this thread started off in crossed purposes .To the readers next time you buy a Zurich or Allianz’s insurance product for you boat from a U.K. broker read the small print where the parent Co is based .

Lets park this here .I am off to Starbucks to buy something , knowingly not breaking any laws ….Ops :) ;)
 
Top