sailorman
Well-known member
You may be teaching granny to suck eggs - Eamonn is a very skilled craftsman in GRP repairs.
he still needs a sensible & reasonable pay-out
You may be teaching granny to suck eggs - Eamonn is a very skilled craftsman in GRP repairs.
HI Eamonn, sorry to hear about Hummingbird. I'll have to pop up and check Carrie is OK
he still needs a sensible & reasonable pay-out
> after all it was his boat that done the damage.
No it wasn't your boat your boat hit his. From the picture yours is the only boat blown over, in which case there could be legal recourse for the yard's negligence in not securing your boat properly. The insurnce company may recoup it's loss by that means.
Don't think this is right.
For example, looking at my policy which is with GJW it explicitly covers negligence "Your vessel is covered for accidents; damage caused by latent defects; negligence; theft......"
But they do NOT cover "loss or damage to your vessel caused by your recklessness or wilful misconduct."
In another policy a few years ago the cover included "negligence" but excluded "gross negligence".
Uh, the boat we are talking about is not the one that blew over.
Afraid Ian that if insurers dont cough up HB will be getting scrapped.
I certainly couldent fork out 10-12k for new mast, rigging, and furling gear.
I would have hoped that the other boat owner's insurers would pay up.
What I really want to know is should I claim through my insurers, GJW?
C_W
Afraid Ian that if insurers dont cough up HB will be getting scrapped.
I certainly couldent fork out 10-12k for new mast, rigging, and furling gear.
I would have hoped that the other boat owner's insurers would pay up.
What I really want to know is should I claim through my insurers, GJW?
C_W
Would it be a good idea for Clyde Wanderer to clean his boat, except for damaged areas, to give a better sense of condition to assessor?