Wansworth
Well-Known Member
Looking at a 27 footer with inmast furling main.Are these systems reliable and in the event of malfunction can I revert to a normal main,which would be my real choice?
I agree but the boat is interesting type and price wise.From the pics it is a proper inmast not an added...still I do agree that there is a big downside if it jams up!!
So how do in-boom systems stack up against in-mast systems? Pros and con's of both would be interesting for a novice
Slight thread drift, but how do you control your outhaul? We have a 20-odd year old Selden 'Furlin' system for the main, which is controlled at the mast, and echo your experiences re convenience etc. But even in modest conditions, and pointing into wind, the sail tends to fly out to its maximum setting at the end of the boom and flap around, until you can gradually wind in at the mast to control it.
In stronger winds the sail flaps so much that it has already shaken three of the vertical sail battens out of their pockets.
So many horror stories for in mast main sails from people that don't use it....sails getting stack and not moving....strong winds and huge waves are about to kill you because you are left with your main flagging and there is nothing you can do....PLEASE, GIVE US A BREAK.
Indeed, my Profurl in-boom retro-fit, on a 9.4m boat, has cost me a tad over 4K euros, including new mainsail - significantly less than an in-mast alternative.That subject has been well covered in the magazines over the years. There are clearly advantages from in boom including ability to keep sail area and use battens, but it has never really caught on with production boats. I think this is largely cost. An inmast as OE is little different in cost to a conventional rig and very well accepted by the market. In boom, based on the aftermarket prices would be substantially more expensive. However, probably cheaper than changing the mast on a retrofit where the market seems to be.