Seastoke
Well-known member
You can check out , but you cannot leave. The Eagles.Wasting time here, so going to keep this brief
CRA ss 11, 50, 62 are not ever capable of being breached by anyone, as matter of simple English. So that deals with those three - no cigar.
CPUTR2008 is a different bit of law - it's 2nd ary legislation made under powers contained in ECA1972, not powers in CRA2015 or its predecessor - whereas the cigar challenge explicitly in its terms relates to CRA2015. But no worries, I'll turn a blind eye to you moving the goalposts.
To remind you of the challenge, because you seem to have forgotten, it is whether CRA2015 (or, following the goalpost move, CPUTR2008) impose an obligation "marketing materials must accurately reflect what the warranty covers" (your words).
Unlike the CRA stuff, the paras you quote from CPUTR2008 impose obligations on traders so they are capable of being breached, punishable by a fine and in extremis 2 yrs prison. Whoopy-doo that means you're in with a chance! Alas, no cigar, because the obligations imposed do not include the obligation "marketing materials must accurately reflect what the warranty covers." If I've missed where they do, feel free to quote the precise words that I'm not seeing.
I'm kinda bored of all this, as is everyone I expect. So unless there's a significant new post, I'm checking out.