nickf
Well-Known Member
Charles,
The foriegn office has been telling all brits in Greece to regoster with the local consulate, .
Not aware of this advice, doesn't appear to be on the Foreign Office website.
Charles,
The foriegn office has been telling all brits in Greece to regoster with the local consulate, .
Not aware of this advice, doesn't appear to be on the Foreign Office website.
Despite of what the doom and gloomers will have you believe the majority of Greeks are actually extremely kind and honest. Kind of crazy that I actually have to point this out. I don't think the business honesty is any worse here than in any other western country, but hey each one for him/her self.
We were advised by the same doom and gloomers two years ago to immediately leave Greece because a new tax would have us pay several thousand Euros in back tax to cruise in Greece. It never happened.
If you have any wish to give Greece a helping hand it certainly doesn't help to instigate unfounded or far fledged worst case scenarios.
Cheers,
Per
I was wrong, Haig was saying this in an interview. But why?
By the way not doom or gloomers! I'm still here and staying here, just being a little more careful, also best read all of that article again if I were you. The Greeks are productive at what exactly? What do the Greeks export for their collective balance of payments? The greeks may work more hours, but at what and why?
Glyka,
No one disputes that the Greek nation suffered under the German occupation in WW2. However, no nation today seriously seeks to atribute decades of economic mismangement to a lack of German reparations.
Equally, no one disputes that the Greeks spend a disproportinate % of GDP on their defence budget. The question is why did they do this? IMHO is is to ensure that the military do not resume the antics of the Colonels and is nothing to do with the mythical threat from Turkey.
Glyka,
No one disputes that the Greek nation suffered under the German occupation in WW2. However, no nation today seriously seeks to atribute decades of economic mismangement to a lack of German reparations.
Equally, no one disputes that the Greeks spend a disproportinate % of GDP on their defence budget. The question is why did they do this? IMHO is is to ensure that the military do not resume the antics of the Colonels and is nothing to do with the mythical threat from Turkey.
Thanks for the reply.
Economic mismanagement is a possible explanation, not a fact whereas lack of reparations and more importantly lack of loan repayment are facts.
The colonels' coup was not a Latin American Junta. It had nothing to do with the military being underpayed or under-funded.
If the threat fromTurkey was mythical why didn't the EU (with two nuclear powers) guarantee its borders at no cost?
By the way, are Cyprus invasion and Imia dispute mythical? Are the Aegean "grey zones" mythical? Are Turkish oil researches in Greek waters mythical? Is the former Turkish PM's recent confession that Turkish MIT had some involvment in Greek forests' arsons mythical?
Nah sey kala (be well - in Greek of course)
Glyka, The Turkish invasion of Cyprus was to protect their citizens after that Junta lot took control, kicking Mackarios out (a Greek), and after Turkey had asked both Britain and France to no avail to step in under treaty obligations. Don't include THAT as justification.