Roberto
Well-known member
Having read that blog & sorted past the twaddle & attempts at comedy i can see what he is saying about the side swing during a knock down. The point is clearly relevant, although I think that I do recall Franklin writing about having to temporarily cease manufacture of his early Aeries design due to a problem during broaches caused in certain seas. His side arms were in some way designed to prevent this; but I cannot find the article or recall the incident in which it all arose.
However, That is not my point, only an aside.
When my Aeries broke recently, it did not swing to one side or the other. I am sure of that because there was no sudden movement of the vane. The shock was dead in line with the direction of the boat as it hit something hard in the water. I am convinced that, in spite of the slight angle aft of the Wind Pilots oar it would not have had the chance to deflect sideways in the same way that my one did not.
It is not unknown for ocean voyagers to hit obstacles at sea, ie logs etc. A well published event would be Guy Thomson loosing his foil in the last round the world race.
I cannot see from the pictures how the Wind Pilot allows for this. Is the shock thus carried right through to the supporting frame? If so I would consider that a serious weak point. The typical cruiser is more likely, like me, to hit a floating obstruction square on than be rolled in serious seas ( Well I hope so anyway!!!) So what is more important. A deliberate break point for impact, or a side swing for being rolled.
That being said, The wind Pilot clearly works, because I have seen ( & spoken to a few) many Dutch & German cruising yachts using them to great effect.
I have one WP, the servo pendulum type, if the blade hits something it can tilt around the bolt that keeps it attached to the swinging arm. If the bolt is not tightened enough the water pressure is enough to tilt it.
You can see it here (also the reason why we called it Nijinsky)
I am very happy with the WP, made over 20k miles with it, though I am not entirely convinced by Peter explanation about 270° sideways movement: the swinging arm can and does turn 270° in case one lifts it out of the water when not in use; but in a knockdown its freedom of movement will be severely reduced by the two ropes connecting it to the tiller or in my case the wheel adaptor. I have put two snap shackles ln the two ropes in order to be able free them to lift it out, otherwise it is not possible. Peter advises to use some "thin cord" to attach one of the blocks through which the command ropes run, to make it act as a mechanical fuse, no matter how I tried I could not find the correct breaking strength of the attachment: either it broke too soon either it resisted to very strong pulls.
As to the pendulum blade resistance, a few severe broaches with the boat at (relatively) high speed and the pendulum pushed hard on one side have been rather convincing. Broaches were my fault, the command ropes were of average quality and getting old, in a spell of bad weather they became too elastic and the WP was reacting too slow, I changed with new and all went back ok.